<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">AR</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Aerosol Research</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">AR</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Aerosol Research</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2940-3391</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/ar-3-219-2025</article-id><title-group><article-title>Particle deliquescence in a turbulent humidity field</article-title><alt-title>Particle deliquescence in a turbulent humidity field</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Niedermeier</surname><given-names>Dennis</given-names></name>
          <email>dennis.niedermeier@tropos.de</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8265-6235</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Hoffmann</surname><given-names>Rasmus</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Schmalfuss</surname><given-names>Silvio</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2347-0956</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Frey</surname><given-names>Wiebke</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4282-1264</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Senf</surname><given-names>Fabian</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1685-2657</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Hellmuth</surname><given-names>Olaf</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Pöhlker</surname><given-names>Mira</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Stratmann</surname><given-names>Frank</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research, Leipzig, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Meteorology and Air Quality Section, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands</institution>
        </aff><author-comment content-type="econtrib"><p>These authors contributed equally to this work.</p></author-comment>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Dennis Niedermeier (dennis.niedermeier@tropos.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>29</day><month>April</month><year>2025</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>3</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>219</fpage><lpage>230</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>18</day><month>December</month><year>2024</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>9</day><month>January</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>26</day><month>March</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>31</day><month>March</month><year>2025</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2025 Dennis Niedermeier et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://ar.copernicus.org/articles/3/219/2025/ar-3-219-2025.html">This article is available from https://ar.copernicus.org/articles/3/219/2025/ar-3-219-2025.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://ar.copernicus.org/articles/3/219/2025/ar-3-219-2025.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://ar.copernicus.org/articles/3/219/2025/ar-3-219-2025.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e153">The atmosphere contains aerosol particles, some of which are hygroscopic in nature. These particles have direct and indirect effects on weather and climate. Furthermore, turbulence causes fluctuations in temperature, water vapor content, and relative humidity (RH). Turbulent humidity fluctuations may influence, among others, the phase state of specific hygroscopic particles. One process of particular interest in that context is particle deliquescence, which is the phase transition of solid particles to solution droplets. It occurs at a certain RH, the so-called deliquescence relative humidity (DRH), which in turn depends on, e.g., the particle substance. This study investigates the deliquescence behavior of sodium chloride particles in a turbulent humidity field, in particular addressing the questions of whether and how turbulent relative humidity fluctuations affect the number and number fraction of deliquesced particles. The turbulent moist-air wind tunnel LACIS-T (Turbulent Leipzig Aerosol Cloud Interaction Simulator) is used for this study. The results show that the number of deliquesced particles is influenced by turbulent RH fluctuations. On the one hand, particle deliquescence can be observed although the mean RH is smaller than the DRH. On the other hand, there are cases for which non-deliquesced particles are present even though the mean RH is larger than the DRH. In general, the number fraction of deliquesced particles depends on a combination of mean relative humidity, strength of humidity fluctuations, and residence time of the particles in the turbulent humidity field. The study concludes that relying solely on the mean relative humidity is inadequate for determining the phase state of deliquescent particle species in the atmosphere. It is necessary to additionally consider both the humidity fluctuations and the particle history.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung</funding-source>
<award-id>01LK2001A-K</award-id>
<award-id>01LK2002A-G</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e165">A large portion of atmospheric aerosol consists of hygroscopic particles, which feature different sizes and phase states and may have immense impacts on Earth's weather and climate. The particle size affects, for example, particle radiative properties as well as the particles' potential to function as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN). The phase state also influences particle radiative properties, as hygroscopically grown particles have different angular scattering properties and refractive indices compared to their dry counterparts <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="paren.1"/>. The liquid particle fraction scatters more light than the respective solid fraction <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41 bib1.bibx36" id="paren.2"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. Furthermore, the phase state influences gas–particle partitioning and heterogeneous and multi-phase chemistry processes as, for example, the presence of water allows for reactions with atmospheric pollutants <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx21" id="paren.3"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p id="d2e181">The phase state depends on the particle properties, i.e., chemical composition and size, as well as the atmospheric conditions, such as temperature and relative humidity (RH). One process of particular interest in that context is particle deliquescence, for which a solid, water-soluble particle turns into an aqueous solution droplet, thereby increasing its size significantly <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.4"><named-content content-type="post">Chap. 11, pp. 547–575</named-content></xref>. This phase transition occurs at a certain RH, called the deliquescence RH (DRH), and is specific for each deliquescent particle substance. The DRH also depends on temperature (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="altparen.5"/>, Chap. 10.2.2, pp. 453–454; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="altparen.6"/>, Chap. 11.4.3, pp. 562–563) and particle size <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.7"/>. Beyond the DRH, a further increase in the RH leads to the growth of the formed solution droplet. However, if the RH decreases below the DRH, the material dissolved in the solution droplet will not re-crystallize. The solution will become supersaturated and will remain in a metastable state until it reaches another specific RH, called the efflorescence RH (ERH, with ERH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> DRH) at which re-crystallization, i.e., efflorescence, occurs. This behavior leads to a hysteresis curve which implies that the phase state of a soluble, deliquescent particle, which is at a RH between the ERH and DRH, depends on its history (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="altparen.8"/>, Chap. 10.2, pp. 449–461; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="altparen.9"/>, Chap. 11, pp. 547–575; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="altparen.10"/>).</p>
      <p id="d2e215">A wide range of theoretical and experimental studies have been performed in the past, and the results obtained significantly increased both the fundamental and quantitative understanding of aerosol particle deliquescence (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="altparen.11"/>, Chap. 10.2, pp. 449–461; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32 bib1.bibx33" id="altparen.12"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="altparen.13"/>, Chap. 12, pp. 317–347; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="altparen.14"/>, Chap. 11, pp. 547–575; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx29" id="altparen.15"/>). This holds even for particles with complex chemical composition. Most of the experimental investigations have focused on the process itself using various techniques <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.16"/>. The majority of experiments were carried out under no-flow conditions. Continuous-flow-type experiments (such as in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="altparen.17"/>) were carried out under laminar flow conditions. However, the atmosphere is turbulent, and turbulent mixing leads to strong fluctuations in temperature, water vapor concentrations, and consequently RH <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx3" id="paren.18"/>, which could affect the phase state of deliquescent particles. To our knowledge, the behavior of deliquescent particles in turbulent humidity fields has not yet been investigated in detail. The questions are whether and how turbulent RH fluctuations affect the number of deliquesced particles and whether or not the number of deliquesced particles is time-dependent due to the hysteresis effect.</p>
      <p id="d2e243">With the turbulent moist-air wind tunnel LACIS-T (Turbulent Leipzig Aerosol Cloud Interaction Simulator, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="altparen.19"/>), we wanted to address these fundamental questions. We performed various experiments for different mean RHs, RH fluctuation intensities, and residence times and determined the number fraction of deliquesced particles. We used size-selected, monodisperse NaCl particles in this study. NaCl was chosen as it is an atmospherically relevant substance that is, e.g., the main component of sea salt particles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.20"/>. Furthermore, the deliquescence properties of NaCl are well characterized: the DRH at 15 °C, the temperature used in our experiments, is about 75.5 % <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.21"><named-content content-type="post">Chap. 10.2.2, pp. 453–454</named-content></xref>; the temperature dependence of the DRH is weak for NaCl (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="altparen.22"/>, Chap. 10.2.2, pp. 453–454; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="altparen.23"/>, Chap. 11.4.3, pp. 562–563); and for a given temperature, the DRH is constant for particle diameters larger than 100 nm <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.24"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e268">The experimental investigations at LACIS-T were accompanied by fluid dynamics simulations performed with OpenFOAM. These large-eddy simulations (LESs) assist in setting up the experiments and aid in interpreting the observations. For example, the simulations provide the strength of RH fluctuations that cannot be obtained experimentally.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Experimental setup</title>
      <p id="d2e279">This section describes the generation, size selection, and pre-conditioning of the NaCl particles and introduces the basic functionality of LACIS-T, the investigated parameter space, and the applied instrumentation.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Particle generation, size selection, and pre-conditioning</title>
      <p id="d2e289">The NaCl particles were generated by means of an atomizer (TSI 3075, TSI Inc., St. Paul, Minnesota, USA) atomizing an aqueous solution of 1 g NaCl L<sup>−1</sup> of double de-ionized water. The resulting aerosol was dried in a diffusion dryer to a RH lower than 20 %, i.e., a RH well below the ERH of NaCl particles, which is between 43 % and 45 % for the investigated particle size range <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx9" id="paren.25"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e307">Downstream of the dryer, the particles are charged by means of a neutralizer. A differential mobility analyzer (DMA; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="altparen.26"/>, type “Vienna medium”) is used to select a narrow particle size fraction. Inside the DMA, a further drying occurred as the RH of the DMA sheath air was always <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 %. For the experiments, we selected a mobility diameter of Dp<sub>mob</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 400 nm in order to be able to detect dry, solid particles optically by means of a Promo 2000 with a welas 2300 aerosol spectrometer (Palas GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany) inside LACIS-T as well as to minimize the number of larger, doubly charged particles being present. As it turns out, their proportion in relation to the total number of selected particles is less than 1 %; i.e., doubly charged particles do not affect our results. Note that a particle shape factor has to be considered when converting the mobility diameter to a mass equivalent diameter because of the non-spherical shape of solid NaCl particles. This factor is 1.08 for NaCl particles according to, e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="text.27"/>. Earlier measurements with the laminar flow tube LACIS <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42 bib1.bibx25" id="paren.28"/> confirm that this shape factor is valid for NaCl particles in the selected size range. In consequence, Dp<sub>mob</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 400 nm corresponds to a mass equivalent diameter of Dp<sub>me</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 370 nm.</p>
      <p id="d2e375">The number concentration of the selected particles was determined utilizing a condensational particle counter (CPC; TSI 3010, TSI Inc., St. Paul, Minnesota, USA) and was kept at about 1000 cm<sup>−3</sup> by means of a dilution system upstream of the DMA. The dilution system consists of a bypass, a filter, and two valves for adjustment of the flows. All flows, i.e., aerosol flow, DMA sheath, and excess airflow, as well as the CPC sample flow, were controlled by mass flow controllers (Brooks Instrument GmbH, Dresden, Germany) and checked with a bubble flow meter (Gilian<sup>®</sup> Gilibrator™, Sensidyne Inc., Clearwater, Florida, USA) on a daily basis.</p>
      <p id="d2e393">For the experiments, three different types of pre-conditioning were applied concerning the NaCl particles  which were fed into LACIS-T: <list list-type="custom"><list-item><label> </label>
      <p id="d2e398"><italic>Case i.</italic> The particles were left dry (i.e., RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 %); therefore solid NaCl particles entered the measurement section of LACIS-T. This setup was only used to determine the optical size distribution of solid NaCl particles (see Sect. 4.2), as dry particle injection into LACIS-T reduces the mean RH in the mixing zone of the measurement section significantly (see Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S1"/>).</p></list-item><list-item><label> </label>
      <p id="d2e413"><italic>Case ii.</italic> The particles were pre-humidified to a dew-point temperature of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9.6 °C (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> °C) by mixing the dry aerosol with pre-humidified particle-free air by means of a saturator (Perma Pure MH-110-12S-4, Perma Pure LLC, Toms River, New Jersey, USA). This led to a RH of 70.2 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) at 15 °C; i.e., the NaCl particles were still non-deliquesced before entering LACIS-T. With the RH at the LACIS-T inlet being closer to the DRH, the mean RH inside the measurement section of LACIS-T is not reduced significantly (see LES results in Sect. 4.1). This setup was used for the LACIS-T experiments for different sets of the mean RH as well as strength of RH fluctuations.</p></list-item><list-item><label> </label>
      <p id="d2e457"><italic>Case iii.</italic> The particles were pre-humidified at RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12.5 °C; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> °C) by means of a saturator (Perma Pure MH-110-12S-4, Perma Pure LLC, Toms River, New Jersey, USA); therefore the NaCl particles deliquesce before entering LACIS-T (RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 85.0 % at 15 °C). This setup was used to determine the optical size distribution of fully deliquesced NaCl particles inside LACIS-T for the different sets of conditions.</p></list-item></list></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>LACIS-T</title>
      <p id="d2e512">LACIS-T is a unique turbulent moist-air wind tunnel which has been established to study cloud physical processes, in general, and cloud microphysics–turbulence interactions, in particular. LACIS-T can be operated  under a wide range of well-characterized and reproducible initial and boundary conditions resembling atmospheric warm, mixed-phase and cold clouds. The design, functionality, and capabilities of the setup are described in detail in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.29"/>, and only a brief description will be given here.</p>
      <p id="d2e518">LACIS-T is a closed-loop wind tunnel of Göttingen type (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>). The unique characteristic of LACIS-T is that it features two parallel flow branches, in which two particle-free airflows, “A” and “B”, can be separately conditioned and controlled with respect to volume flow rate (through the radial blowers and valves, up to 6000 L min<sup>−1</sup> each), water vapor content in terms of a dew-point temperature (through the humidification system, dew-point temperature range <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>40 °C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 °C, with an accuracy of 0.1 K), and temperature (through the heat exchangers, temperature range <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>40 °C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 °C, with an accuracy of 0.05 K). These two airflows pass passive square-mesh grids through which defined turbulence is induced. They then enter the measurement section, at the entrance of which  the particle-free airflows are combined and turbulently mixed. The measurement section is of cuboid shape with the dimensions of 200 cm <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 80 cm <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 cm. The aerosol particles are introduced into the mixing zone of the two turbulent particle-free airflows. This mixing zone provides an ideal environment for studying the influence of the turbulent fluctuations on aerosol and cloud microphysical processes. Downstream of the measurement section, the flow is directed towards an adsorption dehumidifying system where it is dried and heated. Afterwards, the flow is split up into the two branches, cleaned by particle filters, and the whole cycle starts again.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e613">Schematic of LACIS-T including main components and possible conditions. Schematic copyrights: Ingenieurbüro Mathias Lippold, VDI; TROPOS. The figure is adapted from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.30"/> and modified.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://ar.copernicus.org/articles/3/219/2025/ar-3-219-2025-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e626">In this study, the flow rate was set to 4300 L min<sup>−1</sup> for each particle-free airflow, leading to a mean flow velocity of 1.35 m s<sup>−1</sup> in the measurement section. Turbulence conditions inside the measurement section are determined by means of hot-wire anemometry (Dantec Dynamics Inc., Skovlunde, Denmark) and LESs and are very similar to those described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.31"/>. For example, the eddy turnover time <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is a measure for the turbulent mixing timescale, is between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1–0.7 s. It increases due to the decaying turbulence inside the measurement section and is given as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx19" id="paren.32"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. The quantity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the energy dissipation rate, while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the Taylor microscale. In the context of atmospheric conditions, the Taylor microscale is frequently considered to be the appropriate mixing length scale <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.33"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e762">We use isothermal conditions in this study; i.e., the temperature in both particle-free airflows was identical, set to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 °C and monitored via PT100 temperature sensors (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> class B, DIN EN 60751, accuracy of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0300</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0005</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The dew-point temperature was set individually in each particle-free airflow and monitored by means of two dew-point mirrors (DPMs; model 973 by MBW Calibration AG, accuracy of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K; reproducibility of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K), sampling air in each flow branch between the heat exchanger and turbulence grid. Due to the individual settings of the dew-point temperatures, and thus the individual RH values in each flow branch, various RH mixing conditions could be established. That means different mean RH values, and different strengths of RH fluctuations, could be set in the mixing region (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>a as an example for a specific set of RH conditions in branch A and B). In general, the larger the difference between RH<sub>A</sub> and RH<sub>B</sub>, the larger the strength of the RH fluctuations. However, no direct measurement of dew-point temperature fluctuations and consequently RH fluctuations is available so far. The strengths of the fluctuations are determined by means of LESs, which are described in Sect. 4.1.</p>
      <p id="d2e897">Finally, particle size distributions are determined optically via a Promo 2000 with a welas 2300 aerosol spectrometer (Palas GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany). The welas 2300 sensor is placed inside the measurement section with a 15 cm long stainless-steel tube (5 mm inner diameter) on top of its own inlet tube. This additional long tube ensures particle extraction and detection from the flow field, which is only very weakly influenced by the body of the welas 2300, which disturbs the flow field in its closer vicinity. Please note that the distance of the tip of this stainless-steel tube relative to the aerosol inlet of LACIS-T, called “<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>”, is used as a reference in the later data description.</p>
      <p id="d2e907">In the first set of experiments, the welas 2300 is placed at a fixed position inside the measurement section, leading to a fixed residence time of the particles until the detection occurs. The inlet tube is placed at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 cm below the aerosol inlet of LACIS-T. In the second set of experiments, the position of the tube together with the welas 2300 is varied, leading to different mean residence times of the particles.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Numerical setup</title>
      <p id="d2e933">Large-eddy simulations directly compute the large-scale motions of the flow fields from the Navier–Stokes equations and parameterize the unresolved small-scale/sub-grid-scale (SGS) motions. We use the dynamic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-equation LES model in OpenFOAM based on <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.34"/>, who developed a new transport equation for the subgrid-scale kinetic energy, which has proven to be a good model for decaying turbulence and the transport of thermodynamic quantities. A hexaeder-dominated mesh is applied, refined near turbulence grid and walls, with 7.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>6</sup> cells in total. We use an Euler–Lagrange approach for the simulations; i.e., temperature and water vapor mixing ratio are calculated at the grid points, while each individual particle is tracked along its trajectory through the thermodynamic field. Details about the general numerical setup, especially about how to set the initial and boundary conditions, are given in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.35"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e965">Overall, the main goals of these simulations were (a) the determination of the RHs the particles experience along their way through the measurement section for the different experimental conditions and (b) the determination of the deliquesced particle fraction for comparison with the gained experimental data. The RHs, and RH fluctuations the particles experience, which cannot be detected experimentally, were quantified in terms of mean standard deviation of simulation-derived RH probability density functions (pdf's). For this, the RH pdf's are calculated for specific locations along the mixing region inside LACIS-T's measurement section. Furthermore, the numbers of deliquesced and non-deliquesced particles were derived from the simulations and compared with the experimentally obtained ones. Concerning the latter, a dynamical growth law is implemented for the Lagrangian particle simulations accounting for diffusive vapor transport and deposition to the particle surface and latent heat release <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="paren.36"/>, as well as deliquescence and efflorescence. However, the feedback effects on heat transport and mass transfer in the gas phase are ignored as the droplet concentrations (mass and volume ratio) considered in this study are too low to influence the continuous phase. As we are modeling the particle hygroscopic growth dynamically, the model requires information concerning the deliquescence timescale for the considered NaCl particles. We assumed deliquescence to occur on the timescale <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">del</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 10<sup>−4</sup> s (the numerical time step is also 10<sup>−4</sup> s) once DRH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 75.5 % is reached (note that this timescale is 3 orders of magnitude smaller than the mixing timescale <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is between 0.2 and 0.7 s). This assumption is based on molecular dynamics simulations performed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.37"/>, who give the timescale <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">del</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> required for complete deliquescence of an infinitely extended “planar” NaCl slab to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">del</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9.96 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−5</sup> s. The extent to which this assumption is reasonable will be the subject of discussion in Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1079">For particle efflorescence, we also assume that the re-crystallization occurs on the timescale of 10<sup>−4</sup> s once ERH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 45.0 % is reached. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.38"/> show that the re-crystallization of a single micrometer-sized NaCl particle can occur very quickly; however, a clear timescale cannot be determined from Fig. 3 in their paper. Other studies like <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="text.39"/> show that the timescale for particle efflorescence, which is a nucleation process, depends on the ambient RH and is inversely proportional to the nucleation rate. Various studies show that the ERH of NaCl particles is between 43 % and 45 % for the investigated particle size range <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx9" id="paren.40"/>. As it turned out, the minimum RH reached in our experiments is well above 45 %. From this point of view, our assumption about the timescale of particle efflorescence will supposedly not affect the simulation results as efflorescence is unlikely to occur in our investigations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Results</title>
      <p id="d2e1118">This section presents the results of the numerical and experimental investigations. First of all, the LESs provide the RH experienced by the particles. This is then applied to determine the strength of the RH fluctuations, which are later used for the interpretation of the experimental results. The experiments themselves are performed for different mean RHs and strengths of RH fluctuations and for fixed and variable particle residence times. Number fractions of deliquesced particles are determined and discussed.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Turbulent RH field obtained via LESs</title>
      <p id="d2e1128">At first, the simulations are employed to determine the RH experienced by the particles, as well as to ascertain the impact of the particles themselves on the RH field within the mixing region inside the measurement section. This is presented exemplarily for the setting of RH<sub>A</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60 % and RH<sub>B</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 85 %, leading to a mean RH of 72.5 % along the center line. About 78 000 monodisperse NaCl particles with a mass equivalent diameter of Dp<sub>me</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 370 nm are tracked inside the measurement section. The NaCl particles are pre-conditioned according to Case (ii); i.e., the aerosol is injected with RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 70.2 % (as introduced in Sect. 2.1). In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>a, a snapshot of the instantaneous RH field in the symmetry plane is shown, including the respective particles deliquescing and growing along the inverse vertical axis. The dashed line represents the center line, where the strongest mixing occurs, as well as where the particles are detected further downstream. As the particles shown move through the channel, statistics are calculated at distinct horizontal planes over time; i.e., data from particles that pass a given horizontal plane are stored and analyzed later on.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e1191"><bold>(a)</bold> A snapshot of the particle simulation with the fluctuating RH field in the background (flow direction from top to bottom). It depicts the scenario of RH<sub>A</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60 % (right side) and RH<sub>B</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 85 % (left side), resulting in a mean RH of 72.5 % along the center line (dashed white line). Note that only 10 % of the particles are depicted. The particles are colored and sized (not to scale) according to their diameter. <bold>(b)</bold> The obtained temporal median RH, mean RH, and RH fluctuations in terms of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> plotted along the center line as a function of the distance <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to the aerosol inlet of the measurement section. Note that the pre-humidified aerosol is injected (Case ii: RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 70.2 % at 15 °C). <bold>(c)</bold> The normalized frequency of the RH experienced by the particles. The distribution has a Gaussian shape, as evidenced by the normal distribution with RH<sub>mean</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 72.5 % and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.9 %.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://ar.copernicus.org/articles/3/219/2025/ar-3-219-2025-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e1303">As mentioned, the RH of the introduced aerosol is slightly lower than the mean RH along the center line of the measurement section. This influences the RH field along the center line, which is illustrated in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>b in terms of the median RH (RH<sub>med</sub>), the mean RH (RH<sub>mean</sub>) and the standard deviation of the RH (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). First of all, it can be seen that generally RH<sub>med</sub> and RH<sub>mean</sub> fall together. Secondly, RH<sub>mean</sub> is observed to be slightly lower close to the location of aerosol injection. However, it increases on the very first centimeters and then reaches a constant value of 72.5 % at a height of approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 cm. Additionally, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> demonstrates an increase within the initial 15 cm, subsequently reaching a constant value of 4.9 %. Consequently, the data obtained for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 cm will be employed for the subsequent data interpretation. As an example, the RH experienced by particles near the center line when passing the horizontal plane at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 cm is shown as normalized frequencies in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>c, and the obtained RH distribution has a Gaussian shape.</p>
      <p id="d2e1422">Note that there is an influence of the SGS motions on the simulated fluctuations and consequently <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Based on currently ongoing work and in accordance with a study performed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="text.41"/>, we estimate the contributions from these SGS fluctuations to the total fluctuations to be max <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which represents the uncertainty of the determined <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Obtained particle size distributions and determined deliquesced particle fraction</title>
      <p id="d2e1487">In order to be able to determine the fraction of deliquesced particles, first the size distributions of both dry and deliquesced particles, as well as those of a mixture of both, need to be considered. Therefore, in a first set of experiments, different RH conditions are adjusted in order to obtain and interpret the corresponding size distributions. The corresponding RH<sub>mean</sub> values at the center line are calculated from the RH values of the individual particle-free airflows. In general, it turns out from repeated measurements of temperature and dew-point temperature inside the tunnel that there is an absolute uncertainty in RH<sub>mean</sub> of up to 0.6 %. The width of the RH distribution which is given in terms of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is obtained from the LES. For this first set of experiments, the welas 2300 position was fixed, with its inlet being placed at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 cm leading to a mean residence time of the particles before detection of approx. 0.22 s as the mean velocity is 1.35 m s<sup>−1</sup>. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> shows the results of four different experiments for the conditions given in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F3"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e1552">Normalized particle number size distributions determined for the four different experiments summarized in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>. Experiments (1), (2), and (3) are given by the solid red, dotted red, and solid blue lines, respectively. Note that experiment (4) leads to a bimodal distribution at RH<sub>mean</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 72.5 % and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.9 %, featuring both solid and deliquesced NaCl particles (solid brown curve). The dashed brown curve represents a bimodal fit to the curve of experiment (4) in order to determine the solid and deliquesced particle fractions.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://ar.copernicus.org/articles/3/219/2025/ar-3-219-2025-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

<table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e1600">NaCl particle and LACIS-T conditions for four different experiments. Column 1 gives the experiment number. Column 2 shows the condition of the NaCl particles before they are inserted into LACIS-T. Columns 3 and 4 show the corresponding RH conditions inside LACIS-T in terms of RH<sub>mean</sub> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Experiment no.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NaCl particle conditions<sup>*</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col3" nameend="col4">LACIS-T conditions </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RH<sub>mean</sub> [%]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> [%]</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(1)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Case (i) – solid, dry</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">20.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(2)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Case (ii) – solid, pre-humidified</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">72.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Case (iii) – fully deliquesced</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">72.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(4)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Case (ii) – solid, pre-humidified</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">72.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d2e1623"><sup>*</sup> See Sect. 2.1 for details.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e1767">No distinct difference in the obtained particle size distributions is observed for experiments (1) and (2). During experiment (2), the particles most likely start to take up water molecules, leading to a thin liquid shell surrounding the particles; however, particles are still non-deliquesced under these humid conditions. This is in agreement with observations obtained by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="text.42"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="text.43"/> for single NaCl particles.</p>
      <p id="d2e1776">Experiment (3) shows a clear increase in particle size compared to experiments (1) and (2). In this case, the NaCl particles are fully deliquesced. The mean particle diameter determined optically agrees with the diameter calculated with the Köhler equation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.44"/> for this RH<sub>mean</sub>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1791">Finally, experiment (4) results in two modes. The first mode fits with the one for solid NaCl particles, while the second mode fits with the one obtained for the deliquesced particles. That means we observe both solid and deliquesced particles at the same time. In other words, the humidity fluctuations lead to particle deliquescence although RH<sub>mean</sub> is smaller than the DRH, which is about 75.5 % at 15°C <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.45"><named-content content-type="post">Chap. 10.2.2, pp. 453–454</named-content></xref>. By fitting both modes with two lognormal distributions (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>), the solid and deliquesced particle fractions can be determined, which in the example are 0.57 and 0.43, respectively.</p>
      <p id="d2e1810">To systematically quantify this effect, such experiments have been performed for various thermodynamic and flow conditions, as well as particle residence time (i.e., welas 2300 sensor positions).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Dependence of deliquesced particle fraction on RH field and residence time</title>
      <p id="d2e1822">First of all, the influence of RH fluctuations on the deliquesced particle fraction was determined for a fixed welas 2300 position, i.e. a fixed mean residence time. For this, the welas 2300 inlet was placed again at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 cm. RH<sub>mean</sub> was varied between 71.6 % and 78.1 %, i.e., from below to above the DRH of the investigated NaCl particles, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was set between 0 % and 9.5 %. A few studies exist <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx35" id="paren.46"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g., </named-content></xref> that show <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values in the range of 1 % to 4.6 %, depending on the environmental conditions. It means that our measurements cover this range of observed strengths of RH fluctuations.</p>
      <p id="d2e1876">The obtained deliquesced particle fractions <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">del</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are depicted in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for four different RH<sub>mean</sub> values.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F4"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e1914">Deliquesced particle fraction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">del</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of the standard deviation of the RH distribution <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The error bars shown originate from repeated measurements (three to five times) giving the minimal and maximal obtained <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">del</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://ar.copernicus.org/articles/3/219/2025/ar-3-219-2025-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e1957">Generally, it becomes obvious  that the humidity fluctuations have a strong influence on the fraction of deliquesced particles. Particle deliquescence can be observed although RH<sub>mean</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> DRH. Furthermore, we detect an increase in the deliquesced particle fraction with increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as long as RH<sub>mean</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> DRH. In this case, an increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases the probability that solid NaCl particles are in a RH field with RH values higher than the DRH. The slope of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">del</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flattens for RH<sub>mean</sub>, which is close to the DRH, and becomes negative for RH<sub>mean</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> DRH as now the increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases the probability that solid NaCl particles experience a RH field with RH values lower than the DRH and therefore do not deliquesce. In other words, in this case, not all particles deliquesce although RH<sub>mean</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> DRH.</p>
      <p id="d2e2079">Secondly, the influence of RH fluctuations on the deliquesced particle fraction was determined as a function of mean particle residence time <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in a fluctuating RH field. This was achieved by changing the position of the welas 2300. The purpose of this type of experiment is as follows. Particles once deliquesced will not recrystallize/effloresce at the DRH. They would do so at the ERH, which is between 43 % and 45 % for NaCl particles of the investigated size range <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx9" id="paren.47"/>. However, in our experiments, even for the broadest RH distributions, we do not reach this ERH. That means if solid NaCl particles are inserted into fluctuating RH fields, the residence time in this field might influence the number and fraction of deliquesced particles.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F5"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e2098">Normalized particle number size distributions determined experimentally for RH<sub>mean</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 75.9 % and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.9 % but for different residence times <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inside the measurement section. The colors of the different number distributions correspond to the color map on the right-hand side of the plot denoting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://ar.copernicus.org/articles/3/219/2025/ar-3-219-2025-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e2164">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> shows a series of normalized particle size distributions for RH<sub>mean</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 75.9 % and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.9 %, with different <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inside the measurement section. It can be seen that the deliquesced particle mode of the distributions (right mode) increases with increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while the solid particle mode (left mode) decreases. In other words, more particles deliquesce with increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due to the hysteresis effect.</p>
      <p id="d2e2237">Measurements as presented in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> have been carried out for other sets of RH<sub>mean</sub> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values. The respective results are summarized in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>. Here, the fraction of deliquesced particles <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">del</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is depicted as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (logarithmic scale) inside the fluctuating RH environment. In the left plot, RH<sub>mean</sub> is fixed, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is varied. In the right plot, it is vice versa. The key findings are that the fraction of deliquesced particles increases with increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for all investigated cases. For fixed RH<sub>mean</sub>, the slope of the three curves looks very similar, pointing towards an approximately exponential relationship between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">del</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with the curves shifting upwards to higher values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">del</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases. When looking at the curves for fixed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> it can be observed that the slopes become flatter with increasing RH<sub>mean</sub>, as a greater proportion of the particles is already deliquesced at the lowest measured residence times. Consequently, fewer solid particles are available for deliquescence.</p>
      <p id="d2e2393">In summary, it can be said that the combination of turbulent RH fluctuations and hysteresis in aerosol particle deliquescence and efflorescence has a significant impact on the fraction of deliquesced particles over time. The time required for all NaCl particles to deliquesce depends on both the mean RH and the strength of the fluctuations, or in other words, the proportion of deliquesced particles is dependent on RH<sub>mean</sub>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and residence time.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e2418">Deliquesced particle fraction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">del</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of particle residence time <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <bold>(a)</bold> RH<sub>mean</sub> was set to 72.5 %, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was varied. <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was set to 4.9 %, and RH<sub>mean</sub> was varied.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://ar.copernicus.org/articles/3/219/2025/ar-3-219-2025-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e2496">Finally, we simulated the deliquescence of the NaCl particles in the turbulent RH field by running LESs in OpenFOAM. In general, the time dependence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">del</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can also be identified in the model results. However, the simulations appear to overestimate the observed deliquesced particle fractions, which might be caused by our assumption of a constant timescale for the deliquescence process itself. A detailed discussion about this discrepancy and its possible reasoning is given in Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2"/>. Nevertheless it is important to point out that this discrepancy between measurement and simulation does not invalidate the experimental observations and central statements. Furthermore, it motivates us to investigate the suitability of different theories in the future (more details given in Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2"/>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Summary and conclusion</title>
      <p id="d2e2524">We investigated the deliquescence behavior of size-selected, monodisperse NaCl particles in a turbulent humidity field with LACIS-T. The mean RH, the strength of RH fluctuations, and the residence time of the particles in the turbulent humidity field were varied. In general, we found that turbulence affects the number of deliquesced particles in a particle population, and this number depends on the combination of all three of the aforementioned variables. Fluctuations in the RH can lead to particle deliquescence, despite the mean RH being below the deliquescence RH. Conversely, particle deliquescence can be hindered even though the mean RH is above the deliquescence RH. However, a population of solid, non-deliquesced NaCl particles introduced into a fluctuating RH field, where the RH is always greater than the efflorescence RH and the RH fluctuations exceed the DRH, will deliquesce completely due to the combination of the turbulent RH fluctuations and the hysteresis effect. The time required to reach this fully deliquesced state is contingent upon the mean RH and the strength of the fluctuations.</p>
      <p id="d2e2527">We are able to simulate the general behavior of the NaCl particle deliquescence in the turbulent RH field by running LESs in OpenFOAM. However, the simulations tend to overestimate the observed deliquesced particle fractions, which might be caused by our assumption of a constant timescale for the deliquescence process itself. In order to achieve a more accurate representation of the experimental observations, different theories for the derivation of the deliquescence timescale <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">del</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> will be tested in the future. Following, for example, the argumentation of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="text.48"><named-content content-type="post">Chap. 11.3, pp. 553–558</named-content></xref>, nucleation rates and, with that, characteristic deliquescence timescales – which depend on the RH among other things – will be determined and implemented in the LES model.</p>
      <p id="d2e2546">Ultimately, the observation of the onset of particle deliquescence below and the presence of non-deliquesced particles above the DRH in a turbulent humid field is in line with the argumentation of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="text.49"/>, according to which a consistent macroscopic description is no longer given in the vicinity of non-equilibrium phase transitions (such as the deliquescence transition). Near the phase transition (here the DRH), the turbulent fluctuations become as important as the mean values. Macroscopic values represent the most likely ones, which are identical with the mean values only if fluctuations can be neglected. In the real atmosphere, however, turbulent fluctuations are always present. A few studies exist <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx35" id="paren.50"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g., </named-content></xref> that show <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values in the range of 1 % to 4.6 %, depending on the environmental conditions. Our investigations cover this range of observed RH fluctuations, and we observe a distinct influence of the turbulent RH fluctuation on the fraction of deliquesced particles at these <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values. This indicates that our results are relevant for the atmosphere.</p>
      <p id="d2e2579">Altogether, this implies that the description of hygroscopic growth and shrinking during humidification and dehumidification of the ambient atmosphere, respectively, requires the consideration of both (i) the hysteresis effects during particle evolution and in addition (ii) the turbulent character of the thermodynamic conditions of the ambient atmosphere, which affect the macroscopic boundary conditions of phase transition. This is of particular importance, among others, for the purposes of atmospheric modeling as the optical properties of solid and deliquesced particles differ, which needs to be carefully considered, for example, in radiative transfer schemes in global atmospheric models <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="paren.51"/>. In that sense, we also suggest collecting additional data on atmospheric RH fluctuations, to be carried out in terrestrial and marine environments, at ground level and above.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <label>Appendix A</label><title>Comparison of two different NaCl pre-conditioning settings and their effect on the RH field inside LACIS-T</title>
      <p id="d2e2596">Here, we compare the influence of two different types of NaCl particle pre-conditioning, i.e., Case (i) and Case (ii), as introduced in Sect. 2.1, on the RH field along the center line within the measurement section where the particles are injected, transported, and later detected. The comparison is based on the LESs performed in OpenFOAM. In both cases, the settings are RH<sub>A</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60 % and RH<sub>B</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 85 %, leading to a mean RH of 72.5 % along the center line, and about 78 000 monodisperse NaCl particles with a mass equivalent diameter of Dp<sub>me</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 370 nm tracked inside the measurement section. The RH that the particles experience is shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.F7"/> in terms of the median RH (RH<sub>med</sub>), the mean RH (RH<sub>mean</sub>), and the standard deviation of the RH (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). For both cases, RH<sub>med</sub> and RH<sub>mean</sub> fall together. The RH fluctuation distributions (not shown here) have a Gaussian shape. For Case (i), the aerosol is injected with RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 %, and it can be observed that RH<sub>mean</sub> in the mixing zone is lowered significantly close to the aerosol inlet due to the low aerosol RH. The obtained RH<sub>mean</sub> is about 46 % which is 26.5 % lower as it would occur in case of no particle injection. With increasing distance to the aerosol inlet, RH<sub>mean</sub> rises until about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 cm distance where it starts to become constant. Due to this increase in RH<sub>mean</sub>, the whole RH distribution gets shifted towards larger RH values which additionally influences <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This steep increase in RH<sub>mean</sub> combined with the increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> would complicate the data  interpretation. Therefore, this setup was not used for our investigations.</p>

      <fig id="App1.Ch1.S1.F7"><label>Figure A1</label><caption><p id="d2e2789">LES results for the scenario of RH<sub>A</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60 % and RH<sub>B</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 85 %, which results in a mean RH of 72.5 % along the center region (i.e., the main mixing zone). The obtained median RH, mean RH, and RH fluctuations in terms of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are plotted for the center region as a function of the distance <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to the aerosol inlet of the measurement section for two different types of particle injection. <bold>(a)</bold> Injection of dry aerosol (Case i: RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 % at 15 °C). <bold>(b)</bold> Injection of pre-humidified aerosol (Case ii: RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 70.2 % at 15 °C).</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://ar.copernicus.org/articles/3/219/2025/ar-3-219-2025-f07.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e2871">For Case (ii), the aerosol is injected with RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 70.2 %, which results in an only slightly lowered RH<sub>mean</sub> in the mixing zone. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases within the first 15 cm, becoming constant to a value of 4.9 %. Therefore, this setup was applied for our experiments, and data obtained for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 cm were used for the later data interpretation.</p>
</app>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S2">
  <label>Appendix B</label><title>Comparison between measurements and simulations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">del</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d2e2945">The model study was performed to test whether or not we are sensitive enough to observe the effects of turbulent RH fluctuations on the fraction of deliquesced particles. In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.F8"/>, the measured and simulated deliquesced particle fractions <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">del</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are plotted as a function of particle residence time <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exemplarily for RH<sub>mean</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 72.5 % and three different <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values. In general, the time dependence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">del</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can also be identified in the model results. However, the simulations tend to overestimate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">del</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the cases of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.9 % and 9.5 % and for residence times below 0.3 s. For the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.8 % case, there is closer agreement between the measurement and the simulation. However, the simulated slope differs from the experimentally determined one. This latter observation also holds for the other two cases.</p>

      <fig id="App1.Ch1.S2.F8"><label>Figure B1</label><caption><p id="d2e3061">Measured (symbols) and simulated (lines) deliquesced particle fraction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">del</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of particle residence time <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for RH<sub>mean</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 72.5 %.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://ar.copernicus.org/articles/3/219/2025/ar-3-219-2025-f08.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e3108">The question arises about the reason for this discrepancy. In general, the LES model has proven to be an effective tool for simulating the thermodynamic and fluidic conditions inside the measurement section as well as the hygroscopic and dynamic growth of droplets which formed on NaCl particles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.52"/>. In view of the lack of full information of the microscopic state of the investigated system, the modeling setup required some closure assumptions, in which uncertainties are inherent. Perhaps our assumption about the timescale of deliquescence (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">del</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is too simplified. We assumed – as mentioned before – that NaCl deliquescence occurs on the timescale of 10<sup>−4</sup> s once DRH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 75.5 % is reached based on molecular dynamics simulations performed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.53"/>. An increase in the deliquescence timescale <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">del</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 10<sup>−3</sup> s does not lead to a significant change in the simulated deliquesced particle fractions (not shown) because the mixing timescale <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (in the order of 10<sup>−1</sup> s) is still 2 orders of magnitude larger than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">del</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; therefore the microphysical system is able to react to thermodynamic changes.</p>
      <p id="d2e3206">Several other theories of deliquescence have been developed during the last decades (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="altparen.54"/>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="altparen.55"/>, Chap. 7.1, pp. 290–295; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="altparen.56"/>, Chap. 12.2, pp. 319–334; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="altparen.57"/>;  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="altparen.58"/>, Chap. 11.3, pp. 553–558) that are based on different approaches. For example, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="text.59"><named-content content-type="post">Chap. 11.3, pp. 553–558</named-content></xref> describe deliquescence as a nucleation process (in line with experiments performed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="altparen.60"/>), beginning with the formation of a liquid solution germ on a crystal surface. Consequently, they derive a nucleation rate in analogy to surface melting. From this nucleation rate, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">del</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the deliquescence process of NaCl particles could be determined, which depends, among others, on the actual RH. However, it should be noted that we were not able to observe/resolve the nucleation process itself in our laboratory experiments.</p>
      <p id="d2e3244">One could also think about an experimental approach in order to determine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">del</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, for these measurements, energy dissipation rates ranging from 10<sup>−2</sup> up to 10<sup>6</sup> m<sup>2</sup> s<sup>−3</sup> would be needed so that the mixing timescale <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> could be varied, ranging from values larger than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">del</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to values smaller than it. In the two extremes, the microphysical system will either be able to react to thermodynamic changes (fast microphysics, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mo>≫</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">del</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) or not (slow microphysics, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mo>≪</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">del</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The transition region (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">del</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) could give an estimate for the deliquescence timescale.</p>
      <p id="d2e3411">However, testing different theories and performing additional experiments for the derivation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">del</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are beyond the scope of this study. It has to be the objective of future studies to investigate the suitability of different theories and experimental approaches in this context.</p>
</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e3429">Data sets are available via ACTRIS/EUROCHAMP Data Centre at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.25326/H5TE-AS54" ext-link-type="DOI">10.25326/H5TE-AS54</ext-link> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.61"/> and <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.25326/CD1K-QF91" ext-link-type="DOI">10.25326/CD1K-QF91</ext-link> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.62"/>. For further information, please contact Dennis Niedermeier (dennis.niedermeier@tropos.de).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e3447">DN and RH wrote the manuscript with contributions from all co-authors. LACIS-T measurements and data evaluation were performed by DN and RH, with contributions from SiS, WF, MP, and FrS. Numerical simulations were performed by SiS, with contributions from DN, RH, FaS, OH, and FrS. All authors discussed the experimental and numerical results.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e3453">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e3459">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e3465">Wiebke Frey has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 RI program as an Individual Fellowship under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Action, grant agreement no. 835305.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e3470">This research has been supported by the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (grant nos. 01LK2001A-K and 01LK2002A-G) in the context of ACTRIS-D, which is the German contribution to the Aerosols, Clouds and Trace Gases Research Infrastructure (ACTRIS).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e3476">This paper was edited by Jose Castillo and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Bahadur and Russell(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Bahadur, R. and Russell, L. M.: Water uptake coefficients and deliquescence of NaCl nanoparticles at atmospheric relative humidities from molecular dynamics simulations, J. Chem. Phys., 129, 094508, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2971040" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/1.2971040</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Baker et al.(1984)</label><mixed-citation>Baker, M. B., Breidenthal, R. E., Choularton, T. W., and Latham, J.: The  effects of turbulent mixing in clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 41, 299–304,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1984)041&lt;0299:TEOTMI&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(1984)041&lt;0299:TEOTMI&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Bodenschatz et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Bodenschatz, E., Malinowski, S. P., Shaw, R. A., and Stratmann, F.: Can we  understand clouds without turbulence?, Science, 327, 970–971,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1185138" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1185138</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Cantrell et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>Cantrell, W., McCrory, C., and Ewing, G. E.: Nucleated deliquescence of salt, J. Chem. Phys., 116, 2116–2120, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1429924" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/1.1429924</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Chai and Mahesh(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Chai, X. and Mahesh, K.: Dynamic-equation model for large-eddy simulation of  compressible flows, J. Fluid Mech., 699, 385–413,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2012.115" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/jfm.2012.115</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Chandrakar et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Chandrakar, K. K., Morrison, H., Grabowski, W. W., Bryan, G. H., and Shaw, R. A., Supersaturation variability from scalar mixing: Evaluation of a new subgrid-scale model using direct numerical simulations of turbulent Rayleigh–Bénard convection, J. Atmos. Sci., 79, 1191–1210, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-21-0250.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS-D-21-0250.1</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Cziczo et al.(1997)</label><mixed-citation>Cziczo, D. J., Nowak, J. B., Hu, J. H., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Infrared  spectroscopy of model tropospheric aerosols as a function of relative  humidity: Observation of deliquescence and crystallization, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 102, 18843–18850, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD01361" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/97JD01361</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Finlayson-Pitts and Hemminger(2000)</label><mixed-citation>Finlayson-Pitts, B. J. and Hemminger, J. C.: Physical Chemistry of airborne sea salt particles and their components, J. Phys. Chem. A, 104, 11463–11477,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp002968n" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp002968n</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Gao et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Gao, Y., Chen, S. B., and Liya, E. Y.: Efflorescence relative humidity of  airborne sodium chloride particles: A theoretical investigation, Atmos.  Environ., 41, 2019–2023, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.12.014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.12.014</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Haarig et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Haarig, M., Ansmann, A., Gasteiger, J., Kandler, K., Althausen, D., Baars, H., Radenz, M., and Farrell, D. A.: Dry versus wet marine particle optical properties: RH dependence of depolarization ratio, backscatter, and extinction from multiwavelength lidar measurements during SALTRACE, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 14199–14217, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14199-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-14199-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Hellmuth et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation> Hellmuth, O., Khvorostyanov, V. I., Curry, J. A., Shchekin, A. K., Schmelzer, J. W. P., Feistel, R., Djikaev, Y. S., and Baidakov, V. G.: Nucleation Theory and Applications: Special issues, Review series on selected topics of atmospheric sol formation, Vol. 1, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (JINR), Dubna, ISBN: 978-5-9530-0349-0, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Hellmuth and Shchekin(2015)Hellmuth, and Shchekin</label><mixed-citation>Hellmuth, O. and Shchekin, A. K.: Determination of interfacial parameters of a soluble particle in a nonideal solution from measured deliquescence and efflorescence humidities, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 3851–3871, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3851-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-3851-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Kelly and McMurry(1992)</label><mixed-citation>Kelly, W. P. and McMurry, P. H.: Measurement of particle density by inertial  classification of differential mobility analyzer-generated monodisperse  aerosols, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 17, 199–212, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829208959571" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786829208959571</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Khvorostyanov and Curry(2014)</label><mixed-citation> Khvorostyanov, V. I. and Curry, J. A.: Thermodynamics, kinetics, and  microphysics of clouds, Cambridge University Press, ISBN: 978-1-107-01603-3, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Knutson and Whitby(1975)</label><mixed-citation>Knutson, E. O. and Whitby, K. T.: Aerosol classification by electric mobility: apparatus, theory, and applications, J. Aerosol Sci., 6, 443–451,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(75)90060-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0021-8502(75)90060-9</ext-link>, 1975.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Krueger et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>Krueger, B. J., Grassian, V. H., Iedema, M. J., Cowin, J. P., and Laskin, A.:  Probing heterogeneous chemistry of individual atmospheric particles using  scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray analysis, Anal.  Chem., 75, 5170–5179, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac034455t" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ac034455t</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Kulmala et al.(1997)</label><mixed-citation>Kulmala, M., Rannik, Ü., Zapadinsky, E. L., and Clement, C. F.: The effect of saturation fluctuations on droplet growth, J. Aerosol Sci., 28, 1395–1409, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(97)00015-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0021-8502(97)00015-3</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Lamb and Verlinde(2011)</label><mixed-citation> Lamb, D. and Verlinde, J.: Physics and chemistry of clouds, Cambridge  University Press, ISBN: 978-0-521-89910-9, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Lehmann et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Lehmann, K., Siebert, H., and Shaw, R. A.: Homogeneous and inhomogeneous mixing in cumulus clouds: Dependence on local turbulence structure, J. Atmos. Sci., 66, 3641–3659, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAS3012.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2009JAS3012.1</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Lenchow et al.(1994)</label><mixed-citation>Lenchow, D. H., Mann, J., and Kristensen, L.: How long is long enough when measuring fluxes and other turbulence statistics?, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 11, 661–673, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1994)011&lt;0661:HLILEW&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0426(1994)011&lt;0661:HLILEW&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Liu et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Liu, Y., Wu, Z., Huang, X., Shen, H., Bai, Y., Qiao, K., Meng, X., Hu, W.,  Tang, M., and He, L.: Aerosol phase state and its link to chemical  composition and liquid water content in a subtropical coastal megacity,  Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 5027–5033, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b01196" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.9b01196</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Ma et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Ma, S.-S., Yang, W., Zheng, C.-M., Pang, S.-F., and Zhang, Y.-H.: Subsecond  measurements on aerosols: From hygroscopic growth factors to efflorescence  kinetics, Atmos. Environ., 210, 177–185,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.04.049" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.04.049</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>MacPherson et al.(1992)</label><mixed-citation>MacPherson, J. I., Grossman, R. L., and Kelly, R. D.: Intercomparison results for FIFE flux aircraft, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 97, 18499–18514, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/92JD00272" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/92JD00272</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>McGraw and Lewis(2009)</label><mixed-citation>McGraw, R. and Lewis, E. R.: Deliquescence and efflorescence of small  particles, J. Chem. Phys., 131, 194705, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3251056" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/1.3251056</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Niedermeier et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Niedermeier, D., Wex, H., Voigtländer, J., Stratmann, F., Brüggemann, E., Kiselev, A., Henk, H., and Heintzenberg, J.: LACIS-measurements and parameterization of sea-salt particle hygroscopic growth and activation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 579–590, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-579-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-579-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Niedermeier et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Niedermeier, D., Voigtländer, J., Schmalfuß, S., Busch, D., Schumacher, J., Shaw, R. A., and Stratmann, F.: Characterization and first results from LACIS-T: a moist-air wind tunnel to study aerosol–cloud–turbulence interactions, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 2015–2033, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2015-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-13-2015-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Niedermeier(2025a)Niedermeier</label><mixed-citation>Niedermeier, D.: Atmospheric simulation chamber study: sodium chloride + water + None - Aerosol study - hygroscopicity - 2021-07-13, Version 1.0, AERIS [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.25326/H5TE-AS54" ext-link-type="DOI">10.25326/H5TE-AS54</ext-link>, 2025a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Niedermeier(2025b)</label><mixed-citation>Niedermeier, D.: Atmospheric simulation chamber study: sodium chloride + water + None - Aerosol study - hygroscopicity - 2022-03-15, Version 1.0, AERIS [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.25326/CD1K-QF91" ext-link-type="DOI">10.25326/CD1K-QF91</ext-link>, 2025b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Peng et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Peng, C., Chen, L., and Tang, M.: A database for deliquescence and  efflorescence relative humidities of compounds with atmospheric relevance,  Fundamental Research, 2, 578–587, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fmre.2021.11.021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.fmre.2021.11.021</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Prigogine(1979)</label><mixed-citation> Prigogine, I.: Vom Sein zum Werden: Zeit und Komplexität in den Naturwissenschaften. Nobelpreis 1977, R. Piper &amp; Co. Verlag. München/Zürich, 261 pp., ISBN: 978-3-492-02488-4, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Seinfeld and Pandis(2006)</label><mixed-citation> Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric chemistry and physics: from air pollution to climate change, John Wiley &amp; Sons, ISBN: 978-0-471-72018-8, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Shchekin et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Shchekin, A. K., Shabaev, I. V., and Rusanov, A. I.: Thermodynamics of droplet formation around a soluble condensation nucleus in the atmosphere of a solvent vapor, J. Chem. Phys., 129, 214111, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3021078" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/1.3021078</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Shchekin et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Shchekin, A. K., Shabaev, I. V., and Hellmuth, O.: Thermodynamic and kinetic theory of nucleation, deliquescence and efflorescence transitions in the ensemble of droplets on soluble particles, J. Chem. Phys., 138, 054704, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4789309" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/1.4789309</ext-link>, 2013. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Siebert et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Siebert, H., Franke, H., Lehmann, K., Maser, R., Saw, E. W., Schell, D., Shaw, R. A., and Wendisch, M.: Probing finescale dynamics and microphysics of  clouds with helicopter-borne measurements, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 87, 1727–1738, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-87-12-1727" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-87-12-1727</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Siebert and Shaw(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Siebert, H. and Shaw, R. A.: Supersaturation fluctuations during the early  stage of cumulus formation, J. Atmos. Sci., 74, 975–988, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0115.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS-D-16-0115.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Sloane(1984)</label><mixed-citation>Sloane, C.: Optical properties of aerosols of mixed composition, Atmos. Environ., 18, 871–878, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(84)90273-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0004-6981(84)90273-7</ext-link>, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Tang and Munkelwitz(1984)</label><mixed-citation>Tang, I. N. and Munkelwitz, H. R.: An investigation of solute nucleation in  levitated solution droplets, J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 98, 430–438, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(84)90167-X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0021-9797(84)90167-X</ext-link>, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Tang et al.(1977)</label><mixed-citation>Tang, I. N., Munkelwitz, H. R., and Davis, J. G.: Aerosol growth studies – II. Preparation and growth measurements of monodisperse salt aerosols, J. Aerosol Sci., 8, 149–159, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(77)90002-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0021-8502(77)90002-7</ext-link>, 1977.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Tang et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Tang, M., Chan, C. K., Li, Y. J., Su, H., Ma, Q., Wu, Z., Zhang, G., Wang, Z., Ge, M., Hu, M., He, H., and Wang, X.: A review of experimental techniques for aerosol hygroscopicity studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 12631–12686, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-12631-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-12631-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Titos et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Titos, G., Cazorla, A., Zieger, P., Andrews, E., Lyamani, H.,  Granados-Muñoz, M. J., Olmo, F. J., and Alados-Arboledas, L.: Effect of  hygroscopic growth on the aerosol light-scattering coefficient: A review of  measurements, techniques and error sources, Atmos. Environ., 141, 494–507, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.07.021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.07.021</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Toon et al.(1976)</label><mixed-citation>Toon, O. B., Pollack, J. B., and Khare, B. N.: The optical constants of several atmospheric aerosol species: Ammonium sulfate, aluminum oxide, and sodium chloride, J. Geophys. Res.-Oc. Atm., 81, 5733–5748, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JC081i033p05733" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JC081i033p05733</ext-link>, 1976.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Wex et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Wex, H., Kiselev, A., Stratmann, F., Zoboki, J., and Brechtel, F.: Measured and modeled equilibrium sizes of NaCl and (NH<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> particles at relative humidities up to 99.1 %, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, D21212,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005507" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD005507</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Wex et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Wex, H., Ziese, M., Kiselev, A., Henning, S., and Stratmann, F.: Deliquescence and hygroscopic growth of succinic acid particles measured with LACIS, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L17810, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030185" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL030185</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Wilck(1999)</label><mixed-citation> Wilck, M.: Modal Modelling of Multicomponent Aerosols: Modale Modellierung Von Mehrkomponentenaerosolen, Verlag für Wissenschaft und Forschung (VWF), ISBN: 3-89700-080-6, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Wise et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Wise, M. E., Martin, S. T., Russell, L. M., and Buseck, P. R.: Water uptake by NaCl particles prior to deliquescence and the phase rule, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 42, 281–294, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820802047115" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820802047115</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Particle deliquescence in a turbulent humidity field</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Bahadur and Russell(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bahadur, R. and Russell, L. M.: Water uptake coefficients and deliquescence of NaCl nanoparticles at atmospheric relative humidities from molecular dynamics simulations, J. Chem. Phys., 129, 094508, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2971040" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2971040</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Baker et al.(1984)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Baker, M. B., Breidenthal, R. E., Choularton, T. W., and Latham, J.: The  effects of turbulent mixing in clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 41, 299–304,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1984)041&lt;0299:TEOTMI&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1984)041&lt;0299:TEOTMI&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1984.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Bodenschatz et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bodenschatz, E., Malinowski, S. P., Shaw, R. A., and Stratmann, F.: Can we  understand clouds without turbulence?, Science, 327, 970–971,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1185138" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1185138</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Cantrell et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cantrell, W., McCrory, C., and Ewing, G. E.: Nucleated deliquescence of salt,
J. Chem. Phys., 116, 2116–2120, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1429924" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1429924</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Chai and Mahesh(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chai, X. and Mahesh, K.: Dynamic-equation model for large-eddy simulation of  compressible flows, J. Fluid Mech., 699, 385–413,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2012.115" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2012.115</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Chandrakar et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chandrakar, K. K., Morrison, H., Grabowski, W. W., Bryan, G. H., and Shaw, R. A., Supersaturation variability from scalar mixing: Evaluation of a new subgrid-scale model using direct numerical simulations of turbulent Rayleigh–Bénard convection, J. Atmos. Sci., 79, 1191–1210, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-21-0250.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-21-0250.1</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Cziczo et al.(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cziczo, D. J., Nowak, J. B., Hu, J. H., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Infrared  spectroscopy of model tropospheric aerosols as a function of relative  humidity: Observation of deliquescence and crystallization, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 102, 18843–18850, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD01361" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD01361</a>, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Finlayson-Pitts and Hemminger(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Finlayson-Pitts, B. J. and Hemminger, J. C.: Physical Chemistry of airborne sea salt particles and their components, J. Phys. Chem. A, 104, 11463–11477,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp002968n" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp002968n</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Gao et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gao, Y., Chen, S. B., and Liya, E. Y.: Efflorescence relative humidity of  airborne sodium chloride particles: A theoretical investigation, Atmos.  Environ., 41, 2019–2023, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.12.014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.12.014</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Haarig et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Haarig, M., Ansmann, A., Gasteiger, J., Kandler, K., Althausen, D., Baars, H., Radenz, M., and Farrell, D. A.: Dry versus wet marine particle optical properties: RH dependence of depolarization ratio, backscatter, and extinction from multiwavelength lidar measurements during SALTRACE, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 14199–14217, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14199-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14199-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Hellmuth et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hellmuth, O., Khvorostyanov, V. I., Curry, J. A., Shchekin, A. K., Schmelzer, J. W. P., Feistel, R., Djikaev, Y. S., and Baidakov, V. G.: Nucleation Theory and Applications: Special issues, Review series on selected topics of atmospheric sol formation, Vol. 1, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (JINR), Dubna, ISBN:&thinsp;978-5-9530-0349-0, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Hellmuth and Shchekin(2015)Hellmuth, and Shchekin</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hellmuth, O. and Shchekin, A. K.: Determination of interfacial parameters of a soluble particle in a nonideal solution from measured deliquescence and efflorescence humidities, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 3851–3871, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3851-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3851-2015</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Kelly and McMurry(1992)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kelly, W. P. and McMurry, P. H.: Measurement of particle density by inertial  classification of differential mobility analyzer-generated monodisperse  aerosols, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 17, 199–212, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829208959571" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829208959571</a>, 1992.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Khvorostyanov and Curry(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Khvorostyanov, V. I. and Curry, J. A.: Thermodynamics, kinetics, and  microphysics of clouds, Cambridge University Press, ISBN:&thinsp;978-1-107-01603-3, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Knutson and Whitby(1975)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Knutson, E. O. and Whitby, K. T.: Aerosol classification by electric mobility: apparatus, theory, and applications, J. Aerosol Sci., 6, 443–451,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(75)90060-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(75)90060-9</a>, 1975.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Krueger et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Krueger, B. J., Grassian, V. H., Iedema, M. J., Cowin, J. P., and Laskin, A.:  Probing heterogeneous chemistry of individual atmospheric particles using  scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray analysis, Anal.  Chem., 75, 5170–5179, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac034455t" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/ac034455t</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Kulmala et al.(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kulmala, M., Rannik, Ü., Zapadinsky, E. L., and Clement, C. F.: The effect of saturation fluctuations on droplet growth, J. Aerosol Sci., 28, 1395–1409, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(97)00015-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(97)00015-3</a>, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Lamb and Verlinde(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lamb, D. and Verlinde, J.: Physics and chemistry of clouds, Cambridge  University Press, ISBN:&thinsp;978-0-521-89910-9, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Lehmann et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lehmann, K., Siebert, H., and Shaw, R. A.: Homogeneous and inhomogeneous mixing in cumulus clouds: Dependence on local turbulence structure, J. Atmos. Sci., 66, 3641–3659, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAS3012.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAS3012.1</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Lenchow et al.(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lenchow, D. H., Mann, J., and Kristensen, L.: How long is long enough when measuring fluxes and other turbulence statistics?, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 11, 661–673, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1994)011&lt;0661:HLILEW&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1994)011&lt;0661:HLILEW&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1994.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Liu et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, Y., Wu, Z., Huang, X., Shen, H., Bai, Y., Qiao, K., Meng, X., Hu, W.,  Tang, M., and He, L.: Aerosol phase state and its link to chemical  composition and liquid water content in a subtropical coastal megacity,  Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 5027–5033, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b01196" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b01196</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Ma et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ma, S.-S., Yang, W., Zheng, C.-M., Pang, S.-F., and Zhang, Y.-H.: Subsecond  measurements on aerosols: From hygroscopic growth factors to efflorescence  kinetics, Atmos. Environ., 210, 177–185,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.04.049" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.04.049</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>MacPherson et al.(1992)</label><mixed-citation>
      
MacPherson, J. I., Grossman, R. L., and Kelly, R. D.: Intercomparison results for FIFE flux aircraft, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 97, 18499–18514, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/92JD00272" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/92JD00272</a>, 1992.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>McGraw and Lewis(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
      
McGraw, R. and Lewis, E. R.: Deliquescence and efflorescence of small  particles, J. Chem. Phys., 131, 194705, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3251056" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3251056</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Niedermeier et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Niedermeier, D., Wex, H., Voigtländer, J., Stratmann, F., Brüggemann, E., Kiselev, A., Henk, H., and Heintzenberg, J.: LACIS-measurements and parameterization of sea-salt particle hygroscopic growth and activation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 579–590, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-579-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-579-2008</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Niedermeier et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Niedermeier, D., Voigtländer, J., Schmalfuß, S., Busch, D., Schumacher, J., Shaw, R. A., and Stratmann, F.: Characterization and first results from LACIS-T: a moist-air wind tunnel to study aerosol–cloud–turbulence interactions, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 2015–2033, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2015-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2015-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Niedermeier(2025a)Niedermeier</label><mixed-citation>
      
Niedermeier, D.: Atmospheric simulation chamber study: sodium chloride + water + None - Aerosol study - hygroscopicity - 2021-07-13, Version 1.0, AERIS [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.25326/H5TE-AS54" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.25326/H5TE-AS54</a>, 2025a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Niedermeier(2025b)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Niedermeier, D.: Atmospheric simulation chamber study: sodium chloride + water + None - Aerosol study - hygroscopicity - 2022-03-15, Version 1.0, AERIS [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.25326/CD1K-QF91" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.25326/CD1K-QF91</a>, 2025b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Peng et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Peng, C., Chen, L., and Tang, M.: A database for deliquescence and  efflorescence relative humidities of compounds with atmospheric relevance,  Fundamental Research, 2, 578–587, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fmre.2021.11.021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fmre.2021.11.021</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Prigogine(1979)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Prigogine, I.: Vom Sein zum Werden: Zeit und Komplexität in den Naturwissenschaften. Nobelpreis 1977, R. Piper &amp; Co. Verlag. München/Zürich, 261 pp., ISBN:&thinsp;978-3-492-02488-4, 1979.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Seinfeld and Pandis(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric chemistry and physics: from air pollution to climate change, John Wiley &amp; Sons, ISBN:&thinsp;978-0-471-72018-8, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Shchekin et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shchekin, A. K., Shabaev, I. V., and Rusanov, A. I.: Thermodynamics of droplet formation around a soluble condensation nucleus in the atmosphere of a solvent vapor, J. Chem. Phys., 129, 214111, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3021078" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3021078</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Shchekin et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shchekin, A. K., Shabaev, I. V., and Hellmuth, O.: Thermodynamic and kinetic theory of nucleation, deliquescence and efflorescence transitions in the ensemble of droplets on soluble particles, J. Chem. Phys., 138, 054704, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4789309" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4789309</a>, 2013.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Siebert et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Siebert, H., Franke, H., Lehmann, K., Maser, R., Saw, E. W., Schell, D., Shaw, R. A., and Wendisch, M.: Probing finescale dynamics and microphysics of  clouds with helicopter-borne measurements, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 87, 1727–1738, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-87-12-1727" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-87-12-1727</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Siebert and Shaw(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Siebert, H. and Shaw, R. A.: Supersaturation fluctuations during the early  stage of cumulus formation, J. Atmos. Sci., 74, 975–988, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0115.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0115.1</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Sloane(1984)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sloane, C.: Optical properties of aerosols of mixed composition, Atmos. Environ., 18, 871–878, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(84)90273-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(84)90273-7</a>, 1984.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Tang and Munkelwitz(1984)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tang, I. N. and Munkelwitz, H. R.: An investigation of solute nucleation in  levitated solution droplets, J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 98, 430–438, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(84)90167-X" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(84)90167-X</a>, 1984.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Tang et al.(1977)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tang, I. N., Munkelwitz, H. R., and Davis, J. G.: Aerosol growth studies – II. Preparation and growth measurements of monodisperse salt aerosols, J. Aerosol Sci., 8, 149–159, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(77)90002-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(77)90002-7</a>, 1977.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Tang et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tang, M., Chan, C. K., Li, Y. J., Su, H., Ma, Q., Wu, Z., Zhang, G., Wang, Z., Ge, M., Hu, M., He, H., and Wang, X.: A review of experimental techniques for aerosol hygroscopicity studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 12631–12686, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-12631-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-12631-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Titos et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Titos, G., Cazorla, A., Zieger, P., Andrews, E., Lyamani, H.,  Granados-Muñoz, M. J., Olmo, F. J., and Alados-Arboledas, L.: Effect of  hygroscopic growth on the aerosol light-scattering coefficient: A review of  measurements, techniques and error sources, Atmos. Environ., 141, 494–507, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.07.021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.07.021</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Toon et al.(1976)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Toon, O. B., Pollack, J. B., and Khare, B. N.: The optical constants of several atmospheric aerosol species: Ammonium sulfate, aluminum oxide, and sodium chloride, J. Geophys. Res.-Oc. Atm., 81, 5733–5748, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JC081i033p05733" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JC081i033p05733</a>, 1976.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Wex et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wex, H., Kiselev, A., Stratmann, F., Zoboki, J., and Brechtel, F.: Measured and modeled equilibrium sizes of NaCl and (NH<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> particles at relative humidities up to 99.1&thinsp;%, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, D21212,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005507" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005507</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Wex et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wex, H., Ziese, M., Kiselev, A., Henning, S., and Stratmann, F.: Deliquescence and hygroscopic growth of succinic acid particles measured with LACIS, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L17810, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030185" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030185</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Wilck(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wilck, M.: Modal Modelling of Multicomponent Aerosols: Modale Modellierung Von Mehrkomponentenaerosolen, Verlag für Wissenschaft und Forschung (VWF), ISBN:&thinsp;3-89700-080-6, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Wise et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wise, M. E., Martin, S. T., Russell, L. M., and Buseck, P. R.: Water uptake by NaCl particles prior to deliquescence and the phase rule, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 42, 281–294, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820802047115" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820802047115</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
