the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Reactive oxygen species build-up in photochemically aged iron-and copper-doped secondary organic aerosol proxy
Abstract. The toxicity of particulate matter (PM) is highly related to the concentration of particle-bound reactive oxygen species (ROS). Chemical properties, including metal dissolution and the sources of PM, influence ROS production and its oxidative potential. Here, the photochemical aging of a secondary organic aerosol proxy (citric acid, CA) with metal complexes (iron-citrate, FeIIICit) is assessed toward the production of particle-bound ROS with an online instrument (OPROSI). We studied the photochemically induced redox chemistry in iron/copper-citrate particles experimentally mimicked with an aerosol flow tube (AFT) in which UV-aging was probed. Different atmospheric conditions were tested, influencing the physicochemical properties of the particles. We found that UV-aged CA aerosol containing 10 mole% FeIIICit generated ROS concentrations on the order of 0.1 nmol H2O2 eq μg−1, indicating the photochemically driven formation of peroxides. An increase in relative humidity (RH) leads to only a slight but overall lower concentration of ROS, possibly due to a loss of volatile HO2 and H2O2 in the gas phase in the less viscous particles. The RH effect is enhanced in nitrogen sheath flow, but in air and compared to the FeIIICit/CA particles, the iron/copper-citrate samples show a uniformly decreased ROS level. Interestingly, in the high humid nitrogen experiment with copper, we found a much more pronounced decline of the ROS concentration down to 2×10−2 nmol H2O2 eq μg−1 compared to all other irradiation experiments. We suggest that copper may suppress radical redox reactions and therefore consume ROS in an anoxic regime.
- Preprint
(1478 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (extended)
-
RC1: 'Comment on ar-2024-36', Anonymous Referee #1, 28 Jan 2025
reply
The manuscript, “Reactive Oxygen Species Build-up in Photochemically Aged
Iron-and Copper-doped Secondary Organic Aerosol Proxy” by Kilchhofer et al., conducted a study to measure photochemically induced reactive oxygen species (ROS) production on SOA proxy with metal complexes.
The manuscript overall is well-written and easy to follow. However, the manuscript could be improved by providing a more thorough explanation of the methods and results, as well as addressing a few limitations before it is ready for final publication.
Thanks for the opportunity to review this interesting manuscript.
Major comments:
- The authors provide a clear explanation for their choice of Cu and Fe particles to evaluate ROS production in the atmosphere. However, there is no justification for selecting citric acid (CA) as a surrogate for SOA. Can CA effectively represent SOA? The authors should address this point in the introduction.
- As mentioned by the authors in the introduction, the rationale behind using the DCFH assay to measure ROS in SOA particles is explained. Since the DCFH assay measures only specific ROS in SOA particles, the authors should provide more details on the potential limitations of OPROSI in measuring ROS from aerosols that contain multiple types of ROS.
Minor comments:
- The authors define the ROS concentration (ROSDCFH) unit as nM H2O2 L-1 air and the mass-normalized ROS concentration (Cnorm) unit as nM H2O2 eq. μg-1. However, in the results and discussion sections, as well as in some figures, these two abbreviations are used interchangeably. For instance, in Figure 5, the y-axis unit is labeled as ROSDCFH (nmol H2O2 eq. μg-1). According to the authors' definition, the unit for ROSDCFH should be volume-normalized (nM H2O2 eq. L-1 air). Additionally, nmol and nM are distinct units. Please review and clarify this inconsistency.
- Line 231 to 233: Figure 7 indicate about ROSDCFH level of FeCit/CA and FeCit/CuHCit/CA under air and N2 conditions, with 25% and 75% RH. The authors explain “ROSDCFH in FeCit/CuHCit/CA were about 0.05 nmol H2O2eq ug-1 lower compared to FeCit/CA.”. However, the observed difference in ROSDCFH level between FeCit/CA and FeCit/CuHCit/CA under air conditions appears to be smaller than the stated 0.05 nmol H2O2eq ug-1. Please review this discrepancy and clarify.
- Line 242: “The findings back previous efforts to model FeIII reoxidation in photochemically aged~.” can be reworded into “These findings support previous efforts to ~.”
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-2024-36-RC1
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
122 | 36 | 6 | 164 | 5 | 5 |
- HTML: 122
- PDF: 36
- XML: 6
- Total: 164
- BibTeX: 5
- EndNote: 5
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1