the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Uptake of Organic Vapors and Nitric Acid on Atmospheric Freshly Nucleated Particles
Abstract. Sulfuric acid, ammonia, and amines are believed to be key contributors to the initial steps in new particle formation in the atmosphere. However, other compounds such as organic compounds or nitric acid are believed to be important for further growth at larger sizes. In this study, we investigate the potential uptake of first-generation oxidation products from α-pinene (pinic and pinonic acid), and isoprene (trans-β-IEPOX, β4-ISPOOH, and β1-ISOPOH), a potential highly oxidized molecule (HOM), formic acid, and nitric acid. The uptake is probed onto (SA)10(base)10 freshly nucleated particles (FNPs), where SA denotes sulfuric acid and the bases are either ammonia (AM), methylamine (MA), dimethylamine (DMA), or trimethylamine (TMA). The addition free energies were calculated at the ωB97X-D3BJ/6-311++G(3df,3pd)//B97-3c level of theory. We find favorable addition free energies of −8 to −10 kcal/mol for the HOM, pinic acid, and pinonic acid on the less sterically hindered (SA)10(AM)10 and (SA)10(MA)10 FNPs. This suggests that isoprene oxidation products do not contribute to the early growth of FNPs, but the α-pinene products do, in accordance with their expected volatilities.
Calculating the second addition of a pinic acid molecule or pinonic acid molecule on the (SA)10(AM)10 FNPs, we find that pinic acid maintains its large addition free energy decrease due to its two carboxylic acid groups interacting with the other monomer as well as the FNP. The pinonic acid addition free energy drops to −3.9 kcal/mol due to the weak interactions between the FNP and its carbonyl group and the lack of monomer–monomer interactions. The high potential for pinic addition is confirmed by calculating the addition free energy at realistic atmospheric conditions. This means that pinic acid has the potential for organic growth on ∼2 nm FNPs, implying that other dicarboxylic acids could potentially also aid in the early growth.
- Preprint
(5777 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on ar-2024-37', Anonymous Referee #1, 30 Dec 2024
Referee comments for AR-20324-37
Knattrup and Elm investigated the potential uptake of first-generation oxidation products from atmospherically relevant VOCs on (SA)(base) freshly nucleated clusters using DFT and highlight that dicarboxylic acids could potentially contribute to the growth of ~2nm freshly nucleated particles. This study is important for understanding the cluster-to-particle transition process in sulfuric-based clusters. The manuscript is very well written, and results are of substantial relevance to Aerosol science. Therefore, I recommend publication to Aerosol Research after the following minor comments have been addressed.
- Line 97: Do the authors mean 298.15 K?
- The punctuation needs to be checked at some places in the manuscript
- Most calculations have shown that the binding strength of ammonia and amines to sulfuric acid-based clusters is generally in this order: DMA>MA>NH3. How do you explain that this is not the case when most first-generation oxidation products are involved (see Figure 2)?
- Beside the free energy of addition, what do the authors think about the atmospheric concentrations of first-generation oxidation products used in this study? Are their concentrations high enough to cause effective changes in the cluster-to-particle transition process in the actual atmospheric environments?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-2024-37-RC1 -
RC2: 'Comment on ar-2024-37', Anonymous Referee #2, 02 Jan 2025
Knattrup and Elm conducted simulations to investigate the potential uptake of sulfuric acid, ammonia, and amines on first-generation oxidation products from common SOA gas precursors. This study is significant for understanding the reaction mechanism of the second addition of sulfuric acid, ammonia, and ammonia on SOA. The work was well-designed, and the paper was well-organized. The results strongly support the authors' conclusions. Overall, I recommend this paper to be published. However, I have a few minor comments I want the authors to consider.
- Could you comment on how RH and higher temperature (e.g., PBL condition) will affect your results?
- Could you explain why you chose (SA)10(AM)10? I am not very familiar with this.
- It will be good to include the chemical reaction mechanism in the main manuscript to help readers understand the reaction.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-2024-37-RC2 - AC1: 'Comment on ar-2024-37', Jonas Elm, 28 Jan 2025
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on ar-2024-37', Anonymous Referee #1, 30 Dec 2024
Referee comments for AR-20324-37
Knattrup and Elm investigated the potential uptake of first-generation oxidation products from atmospherically relevant VOCs on (SA)(base) freshly nucleated clusters using DFT and highlight that dicarboxylic acids could potentially contribute to the growth of ~2nm freshly nucleated particles. This study is important for understanding the cluster-to-particle transition process in sulfuric-based clusters. The manuscript is very well written, and results are of substantial relevance to Aerosol science. Therefore, I recommend publication to Aerosol Research after the following minor comments have been addressed.
- Line 97: Do the authors mean 298.15 K?
- The punctuation needs to be checked at some places in the manuscript
- Most calculations have shown that the binding strength of ammonia and amines to sulfuric acid-based clusters is generally in this order: DMA>MA>NH3. How do you explain that this is not the case when most first-generation oxidation products are involved (see Figure 2)?
- Beside the free energy of addition, what do the authors think about the atmospheric concentrations of first-generation oxidation products used in this study? Are their concentrations high enough to cause effective changes in the cluster-to-particle transition process in the actual atmospheric environments?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-2024-37-RC1 -
RC2: 'Comment on ar-2024-37', Anonymous Referee #2, 02 Jan 2025
Knattrup and Elm conducted simulations to investigate the potential uptake of sulfuric acid, ammonia, and amines on first-generation oxidation products from common SOA gas precursors. This study is significant for understanding the reaction mechanism of the second addition of sulfuric acid, ammonia, and ammonia on SOA. The work was well-designed, and the paper was well-organized. The results strongly support the authors' conclusions. Overall, I recommend this paper to be published. However, I have a few minor comments I want the authors to consider.
- Could you comment on how RH and higher temperature (e.g., PBL condition) will affect your results?
- Could you explain why you chose (SA)10(AM)10? I am not very familiar with this.
- It will be good to include the chemical reaction mechanism in the main manuscript to help readers understand the reaction.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-2024-37-RC2 - AC1: 'Comment on ar-2024-37', Jonas Elm, 28 Jan 2025
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
132 | 57 | 8 | 197 | 2 | 3 |
- HTML: 132
- PDF: 57
- XML: 8
- Total: 197
- BibTeX: 2
- EndNote: 3
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1