the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Determination of aerosol composition by ED-XRF on Teflon and quartz substrates: potentialities and limits
Abstract. Energy Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence (ED-XRF) is a versatile non-destructive technique to evaluate elemental composition of atmospheric particulate matter (PM) without the needs of sample preparation and with high potentiality in source apportionment studies. It is usually applied on Teflon or polycarbonate substrates; however, it would be preferable to use quartz substrates for the possibility to use the same substrate also for carbon detection. In this work an inter-comparison among five laboratories on PM10 samples collected on Teflon and quartz filters was done with the specific purpose of understanding the performance of the ED-XRF technique applied to samples collected on quartz substrates. LODs on quartz substrates were significantly larger than those on Teflon for the majority of the elements with the exclusion of Cl, Mn, Cu, and Rb, which had comparable LODs for the two substrates. Repeatability on PM10 samples collected on quartz and Teflon substrates was comparable and, on average, better than 10 % for the majority of the elements analysed and better than 5 % for several elements. Comparison of analysis on Teflon filters for twenty elements obtained by the different laboratories were in the range of ±15 % of the 1:1 line for most of the elements and laboratories. Comparison of measurements on samples collected on quartz and Teflon substrates showed that 17 elements were well correlated (R>0.7) with average Cquartz/CTeflon ratios in the range 0.6±0.1 (for light elements, due to self-absorption effects) to 1.1±0.1 for the majority of the cases. This suggested that reasonable results could be obtained on quartz substrates for 17 elements, including Na, Mg, and Al, using calibration on Teflon and the ratios Cquartz/CTeflon as correction factors. However, these correction factors were dependent on the instrument and method used for the analysis.
Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Aerosol Research.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.- Preprint
(744 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 15 Apr 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on ar-2025-10', Anonymous Referee #1, 28 Mar 2025
reply
Determination of aerosol composition by ED-XRF on Teflon and quartz substrates: potentialities and limits
General comment:This paper uses EDXRF to study the chemical composition of particulate matter collected on quartz fiber and PTFE filters. While the results presented are not scientifically flawed, the content is too technical and contains almost no new scientific findings.
Specific comments:
L38 It is not appropriate to state in the introduction that X-ray fluorescence analysis is useful for Si measurements, despite the fact that the main purpose of this study is to use quartz fiber filters.
L41 The authors described that the EDXRF is completely non-destructive, but I believe that some of volatile compounds could be evapolated during EDXRF analysis.
L54 What do you mean by "HPIC"?
L95 I understand that this is depending on the researcher, but I feel that 2.3 m3/L is not a "low-volume", but a "middle volume" sampler.
Fig. 3, I'm wondering whether the repeatability depends on the mass loading on filter.
Fig. 4 In this scatter plot, the x-axis should indicate the reference or true value. I do not understand why only the Lecce sample is given special treatment. It has no scientific justification.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-2025-10-RC1
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
63 | 20 | 4 | 87 | 4 | 5 |
- HTML: 63
- PDF: 20
- XML: 4
- Total: 87
- BibTeX: 4
- EndNote: 5
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1