Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-2025-27
https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-2025-27
29 Sep 2025
 | 29 Sep 2025
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal AR.

Results and insights from the first ACTRIS intercomparison workshop on sub-10 nm aerosol sizing instrumentation

Herbert G. Hartl, Janne Lampilahti, Rima Baalbaki, Lauri Ahonen, Tommy Chan, Tinghang Zhang, Joonas Vanhanen, Joonas Purén, Gerhard Steiner, Sebastian Schmitt, Amine Koched, Manuel Granzin, Petr Roztocil, Silja Häme, Tuukka Petäjä, and Katrianne Lehtipalo

Abstract. Sub-10 nm aerosol particles play a critical role in the atmosphere due to their involvement in new particle formation - a key process influencing cloud condensation nuclei availability. In recognition of their significance, international observation frameworks such as the Aerosol, Clouds and Trace Gases Research Infrastructure (ACTRIS) are in the process of integrating their observation into standardised protocols. ACTRIS aims to enhance the understanding of atmospheric processes including those related to particle dynamics and their interactions with clouds and climate through harmonized long-term observations. To evaluate the performance of current instrumentation for sub-10 nm particle measurements, as well as the procedures for doing so, the ACTRIS Cluster Calibration Center in Helsinki, Finland, held its first workshop on the intercomparison of instrumentation for sub-10 nm aerosol particle number size distribution measurements in November 2023.

In this workshop, three mobility-based systems (GRIMM PSMPS, TSI 1 nm SMPS and TSI 3938N56) and five activation-based systems (three Airmodus A11 and two Airmodus A12) were evaluated. The focus lay on assessing their number concentration response and size dependent detection efficiency – including determination of the diameter with 50 % detection efficiency d50 – and sizing accuracy. In addition to these parameters, the instruments were compared with each other while measuring aerosol particle number size distributions side-by-side from an aerosol chamber. Beyond instrument performance evaluation, the workshop aimed to test and assess the calibration and comparison methods to identify where further refinement is needed to support ACTRIS compliance.

While this work highlights key strengths of the different measurement techniques and instruments, several challenges remain. Mobility-based systems showed high sizing accuracy especially for particles larger than 2 nm, while encountering challenges in measuring particles in the lower atmospheric concentration range. Activation-based systems proved more sensitive at lower particle number concentrations and particle sizes with the drawback of slight unit-to-unit variability. Additionally, a systematic size shift was identified in aerosols generated by 4-way-cross glowing wire generator setups, indicating a need for further investigation of this effect and development of the calibration equipment in the sub-10 nm size range.

Competing interests: Herbert Hartl, Joonas Vanhanden and Joonas Purén are employed by Airmodus Oy. Gerhard Steiner is employed by Grimm Aerosol Technik GmbH. Amine Koched and Sebastian Schmitt are employed by TSI GmbH. The latter is also on the editorial board of the Aerosol Research journal.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Herbert G. Hartl, Janne Lampilahti, Rima Baalbaki, Lauri Ahonen, Tommy Chan, Tinghang Zhang, Joonas Vanhanen, Joonas Purén, Gerhard Steiner, Sebastian Schmitt, Amine Koched, Manuel Granzin, Petr Roztocil, Silja Häme, Tuukka Petäjä, and Katrianne Lehtipalo

Status: open (until 10 Nov 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Herbert G. Hartl, Janne Lampilahti, Rima Baalbaki, Lauri Ahonen, Tommy Chan, Tinghang Zhang, Joonas Vanhanen, Joonas Purén, Gerhard Steiner, Sebastian Schmitt, Amine Koched, Manuel Granzin, Petr Roztocil, Silja Häme, Tuukka Petäjä, and Katrianne Lehtipalo
Herbert G. Hartl, Janne Lampilahti, Rima Baalbaki, Lauri Ahonen, Tommy Chan, Tinghang Zhang, Joonas Vanhanen, Joonas Purén, Gerhard Steiner, Sebastian Schmitt, Amine Koched, Manuel Granzin, Petr Roztocil, Silja Häme, Tuukka Petäjä, and Katrianne Lehtipalo

Viewed

Total article views: 127 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
83 43 1 127 0 0
  • HTML: 83
  • PDF: 43
  • XML: 1
  • Total: 127
  • BibTeX: 0
  • EndNote: 0
Views and downloads (calculated since 29 Sep 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 29 Sep 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 128 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 128 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 02 Oct 2025
Download
Short summary
Small airborne particles, influence how clouds form and how they affect climate. Our study compared eight different instruments that measure size distributions of these particles to understand the instruments' strengths and weaknesses. We found that some systems are more accurate, while others are more sensitive at tiny sizes. These results will help improve future monitoring of air quality and climate processes.
Share
Altmetrics