Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-2026-17
https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-2026-17
05 May 2026
 | 05 May 2026
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal AR.

Challenges in measuring sticky biogenic ice-nucleating macromolecules

Joseph Robinson, Martin I. Daily, Polly B. Foster, Jack P. Macklin, James B. McQuaid, Mark D. Tarn, and Benjamin J. Murray

Abstract. Ice-nucleating particles (INPs) are aerosol particles that influence mixed-phase clouds and in doing so impact weather and climate worldwide. To improve our understanding of ice production in mixed-phase clouds, we need techniques capable of accurately measuring atmospheric INP concentration spectra. However, there are sometimes discrepancies between the techniques commonly used to measure ambient INP concentrations, particularly when used in environments with abundant biogenic ice-nucleating material. Proteins and macromolecules adsorb to surfaces, such as filters, but the impact of this interaction on INP measurements is unknown. Here, we compare a widely used technique that involves washing collected aerosol particles off polycarbonate filters into aqueous suspension for subsequent INP droplet freezing assay (wash-off), with a technique where droplets are placed directly atop PTFE filters on a cold stage (drop-on) and also an online technique using an expansion chamber. Our results show that the wash-off technique underestimates the INP activity when free ice-nucleating proteins are present due to the poor recovery of the proteins from the filter into the wash-off suspension. However, there is much better agreement between techniques for INPs associated with coarse-mode mineral dust particles or cell fragments and for polysaccharide INPs from pollen. These findings indicate that some field-based INP measurements that use a wash-off technique may produce atmospheric INP concentrations that are biased low, particularly in regions with abundant proteinaceous INPs.

Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Aerosol Research.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Joseph Robinson, Martin I. Daily, Polly B. Foster, Jack P. Macklin, James B. McQuaid, Mark D. Tarn, and Benjamin J. Murray

Status: open (until 16 Jun 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Joseph Robinson, Martin I. Daily, Polly B. Foster, Jack P. Macklin, James B. McQuaid, Mark D. Tarn, and Benjamin J. Murray
Joseph Robinson, Martin I. Daily, Polly B. Foster, Jack P. Macklin, James B. McQuaid, Mark D. Tarn, and Benjamin J. Murray
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 05 May 2026
Download
Short summary
Ice formation in many clouds is initiated by airborne particles, which are often measured by collecting them on a filter and washing them into water for analysis. Using controlled laboratory experiments, we show that some of these particles adhere strongly to the filter and are not recovered. As a result, this common method can underestimate how many ice-forming particles are present in the atmosphere.
Share
Altmetrics