Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-2026-42
https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-2026-42
09 Nov 2026
 | 09 Nov 2026
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal AR.

Sensitivity Analysis for a Statistical Prediction Model Utilized for Particle Number Concentrations with a Focus on Submicron Size Fractions

Adeeb Ktaish, Nahid Atashi, Ola Surakhi, Yu Zhao, Tianyi Zhao, Martha Arbayani Zaidan, Tuukka Petäjä, Tuija Jokinen, Wei Du, Markku Kulmala, and Tareq Hussein

Abstract. Long-term particle number size distribution (PNSD) observations are sparse and costly to maintain, limiting their use for prediction and process attribution. We develop a Bayesian regression with autoregressive (AR) errors and sequential prediction, estimating posteriors via Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC). The study uses multi-year data set from 1996 till 2024, hourly observations from three Finnish SMEAR stations—SMEAR I (Värriö), SMEAR II (Hyytiälä), and SMEAR III (Helsinki)—with predictors drawn from routinely measured meteorology and trace gases. The developed model was applied on 5 different scenarios with different aims.Scenario I showed that expanding the historical training period improve or stabilize prediction performance. Scenario II demonstrated that predictive performance depends strongly on the training year. Scenario III showed that adding increasingly old observations provide no additional benefit once recent observations were already included. Scenario IV demonstrated that progressively updating the model with more recent data generally improved predictive performance. Scenario V showed that increasing the length of consecutive training windows generally reduced prediction errors. Addtionally, the model captures both diurnal and seasonal variability and achieves high coefficients of determination (R2) at 1 h resolution indicating that most observed variability is explained. These results suggest a successful prediction for particle number concentrations. The potential of this approach is to make future forecasting for particle number concentrations for the up coming years.

Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Aerosol Research.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Adeeb Ktaish, Nahid Atashi, Ola Surakhi, Yu Zhao, Tianyi Zhao, Martha Arbayani Zaidan, Tuukka Petäjä, Tuija Jokinen, Wei Du, Markku Kulmala, and Tareq Hussein

Status: open (until 21 Dec 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Adeeb Ktaish, Nahid Atashi, Ola Surakhi, Yu Zhao, Tianyi Zhao, Martha Arbayani Zaidan, Tuukka Petäjä, Tuija Jokinen, Wei Du, Markku Kulmala, and Tareq Hussein
Adeeb Ktaish, Nahid Atashi, Ola Surakhi, Yu Zhao, Tianyi Zhao, Martha Arbayani Zaidan, Tuukka Petäjä, Tuija Jokinen, Wei Du, Markku Kulmala, and Tareq Hussein

Viewed

Total article views: 5 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
4 1 0 5 0 0
  • HTML: 4
  • PDF: 1
  • XML: 0
  • Total: 5
  • BibTeX: 0
  • EndNote: 0
Views and downloads (calculated since 09 Nov 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 09 Nov 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 5 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 5 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 10 Nov 2026
Download
Short summary
We developed a regression model to predict particle number concentrations across size ranges using meteorological variables and trace gases at SMEAR stations in Helsinki, Hyytiälä, and Värriö. The model performed well and captured diurnal and seasonal variability. Five scenarios showed that training data selection, recency, and duration influence performance, with limited benefits from older data. These findings guide training data selection and support future forecasting.
Share
Altmetrics