Articles | Volume 1, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-1-65-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-1-65-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
22 Dec 2023
Research article |
| 22 Dec 2023
| 22 Dec 2023
A novel measurement system for unattended, in situ characterization of carbonaceous aerosols
Alejandro Keller
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Institute for Sensors and Electronics, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, Klosterzelgstrasse 2, 5210 Windisch, Switzerland
Patrick Specht
Institute for Sensors and Electronics, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, Klosterzelgstrasse 2, 5210 Windisch, Switzerland
Peter Steigmeier
Institute for Sensors and Electronics, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, Klosterzelgstrasse 2, 5210 Windisch, Switzerland
Ernest Weingartner
Institute for Sensors and Electronics, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, Klosterzelgstrasse 2, 5210 Windisch, Switzerland
Related authors
Luka Drinovec, Jesus Yus-Diez, Tobias Bühlmann, Maitane Iturrate-Garcia, Tobias Hammer, Konstantina Vasilatou, Arun Babu Suja, Thomas Müller, Krzysztof Ciupek, Alejandro Keller, Ernest Weingartner, Jorge Saturno, Maria Gini, Kostas Eleftheriadis, John Backman, Eija Asmi, and Griša Močnik
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1501, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1501, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).
Short summary
Short summary
We evaluated a traceable calibration method for aerosol absorption instruments based on monodisperse nigrosin particles. The absorption coefficient calculated using Mie theory was compared with measurements using the Photo-Thermal Aerosol Absorption Monitor, traceably calibrated with NO2. Particle classification using setups with the differential mobility analyzer, the centrifugal particle mass analyzer and a tandem of both in series were tested.
Luka Drinovec, Jesus Yus-Diez, Tobias Bühlmann, Maitane Iturrate-Garcia, Tobias Hammer, Konstantina Vasilatou, Arun Babu Suja, Thomas Müller, Krzysztof Ciupek, Alejandro Keller, Ernest Weingartner, Jorge Saturno, Maria Gini, Kostas Eleftheriadis, John Backman, Eija Asmi, and Griša Močnik
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1501, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1501, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).
Short summary
Short summary
We evaluated a traceable calibration method for aerosol absorption instruments based on monodisperse nigrosin particles. The absorption coefficient calculated using Mie theory was compared with measurements using the Photo-Thermal Aerosol Absorption Monitor, traceably calibrated with NO2. Particle classification using setups with the differential mobility analyzer, the centrifugal particle mass analyzer and a tandem of both in series were tested.
Luka Drinovec, Uroš Jagodič, Luka Pirker, Miha Škarabot, Mario Kurtjak, Kristijan Vidović, Luca Ferrero, Bradley Visser, Jannis Röhrbein, Ernest Weingartner, Daniel M. Kalbermatter, Konstantina Vasilatou, Tobias Bühlmann, Celine Pascale, Thomas Müller, Alfred Wiedensohler, and Griša Močnik
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 3805–3825, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3805-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3805-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A new photothermal interferometer (PTAAM-2λ) for artefact-free determination of the aerosol absorption coefficient at two wavelengths is presented. The instrument is calibrated with NO2 and polydisperse nigrosin, resulting in very low uncertainties of the absorption coefficients: 4 % at 532 nm and 6 % at 1064 nm. The instrument’s performance makes the PTAAM-2λ a strong candidate for reference measurements of the aerosol absorption coefficient.
Daniel M. Kalbermatter, Griša Močnik, Luka Drinovec, Bradley Visser, Jannis Röhrbein, Matthias Oscity, Ernest Weingartner, Antti-Pekka Hyvärinen, and Konstantina Vasilatou
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 561–572, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-561-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-561-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Soot particles with varying amounts of secondary organic matter coating were generated and used to compare a series of aerosol-absorption-measuring instruments: filter-based and photoacoustic instruments as well as photo-thermal interferometers. Significant deviations in the response of the instruments were observed depending on the amount of secondary organic coating. The system can be used for the inter-comparison and characterisation of instruments.
Gloria Titos, María A. Burgos, Paul Zieger, Lucas Alados-Arboledas, Urs Baltensperger, Anne Jefferson, James Sherman, Ernest Weingartner, Bas Henzing, Krista Luoma, Colin O'Dowd, Alfred Wiedensohler, and Elisabeth Andrews
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 13031–13050, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-13031-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-13031-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This paper investigates the impact of water uptake on aerosol optical properties, in particular the aerosol light-scattering coefficient. Although in situ measurements are performed at low relative humidity (typically at
RH < 40 %), to address the climatic impact of aerosol particles it is necessary to take into account the effect that water uptake may have on the aerosol optical properties.
Cited articles
Cain, K. P., Liangou, A., Davidson, M. L., and Pandis, S. N.: α-Pinene, Limonene, and Cyclohexene Secondary Organic Aerosol Hygroscopicity and Oxidation Level as a Function of Volatility, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 21, 200511, https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2020.08.0511, 2021. a
Cavalli, F., Viana, M., Yttri, K. E., Genberg, J., and Putaud, J.-P.: Toward a standardised thermal-optical protocol for measuring atmospheric organic and elemental carbon: the EUSAAR protocol, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 79–89, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-79-2010, 2010. a
Cheng, Y.-H. and Tsai, C.-J.: Evaporation loss of ammonium nitrate particles during filter sampling, J. Aerosol Sci., 28, 1553–1567, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(97)00033-5, 1997. a
Chow, J. C.: Measurement Methods to Determine Compliance with Ambient Air Quality Standards for Suspended Particles, J. Air Waste Manage., 45, 320–382, https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.1995.10467369, 1995. a
Clague, A., Donnet, J., Wang, T., and Peng, J.: A comparison of diesel engine soot with carbon black, Carbon, 37, 1553–1565, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(99)00035-4, 1999. a
Collaud Coen, M., Weingartner, E., Apituley, A., Ceburnis, D., Fierz-Schmidhauser, R., Flentje, H., Henzing, J. S., Jennings, S. G., Moerman, M., Petzold, A., Schmid, O., and Baltensperger, U.: Minimizing light absorption measurement artifacts of the Aethalometer: evaluation of five correction algorithms, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 457–474, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-457-2010, 2010. a
Corbin, J. C., Moallemi, A., Liu, F., Gagné, S., Olfert, J. S., Smallwood, G. J., and Lobo, P.: Closure between Particulate Matter Concentrations Measured Ex Situ by Thermal–Optical Analysis and in Situ by the CPMA–Electrometer Reference Mass System, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 54, 1293–1309, https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2020.1788710, 2020. a, b
Diab, J., Streibel, T., Cavalli, F., Lee, S. C., Saathoff, H., Mamakos, A., Chow, J. C., Chen, L.-W. A., Watson, J. G., Sippula, O., and Zimmermann, R.: Hyphenation of a
Fuller, R., Landrigan, P. J., Balakrishnan, K., Bathan, G., Bose-O'Reilly, S., Brauer, M., Caravanos, J., Chiles, T., Cohen, A., Corra, L., Cropper, M., Ferraro, G., Hanna, J., Hanrahan, D., Hu, H., Hunter, D., Janata, G., Kupka, R., Lanphear, B., Lichtveld, M., Martin, K., Mustapha, A., Sanchez-Triana, E., Sandilya, K., Schaefli, L., Shaw, J., Seddon, J., Suk, W., Téllez-Rojo, M. M., and Yan, C.: Pollution and health: a progress update, The Lancet Planetary Health, 6, e535–e547, https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00090-0, 2022. a
Haller, T., Rentenberger, C., Meyer, J. C., Felgitsch, L., Grothe, H., and Hitzenberger, R.: Structural changes of CAST soot during a thermal–optical measurement protocol, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 3503–3519, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-3503-2019, 2019. a
Hueglin, C., Scherrer, L., and Burtscher, H.: An Accurate, Continuously Adjustable Dilution System (1:10 to 1:104) for Submicron Aerosols, J. Aerosol Sci., 28, 1049–1055, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(96)00485-5, 1997. a
Kalbermatter, D. M., Močnik, G., Drinovec, L., Visser, B., Röhrbein, J., Oscity, M., Weingartner, E., Hyvärinen, A.-P., and Vasilatou, K.: Comparing black-carbon- and aerosol-absorption-measuring instruments – a new system using lab-generated soot coated with controlled amounts of secondary organic matter, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 561–572, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-561-2022, 2022. a, b, c
Kelesidis, G. A. and Pratsinis, S. E.: Estimating the Internal and Surface Oxidation of Soot Agglomerates, Combustion and Flame, 209, 493–499, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2019.08.001, 2019a. a
Kelesidis, G. A. and Pratsinis, S. E.: Soot Light Absorption and Refractive Index during Agglomeration and Surface Growth, P. Combust. Inst., 37, 1177–1184, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2018.08.025, 2019b. a
Kelesidis, G. A., Goudeli, E., and Pratsinis, S. E.: Morphology and Mobility Diameter of Carbonaceous Aerosols during Agglomeration and Surface Growth, Carbon, 121, 527–535, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2017.06.004, 2017. a
Kelesidis, G. A., Bruun, C. A., and Pratsinis, S. E.: The Impact of Organic Carbon on Soot Light Absorption, Carbon, 172, 742–749, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2020.10.032, 2021. a
Keller, A.: FATCAT-Scripts, GitHub [code], https://github.com/alejandrokeller/FATCAT-Scripts/tree/master (last access: 22 July 2022), 2022. a
Keller, A. and Burtscher, H.: A Continuous Photo-Oxidation Flow Reactor for a Defined Measurement of the SOA Formation Potential of Wood Burning Emissions, J. Aerosol Sci., 49, 9–20, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2012.02.007, 2012. a
Keller, A. and Burtscher, H.: Characterizing Particulate Emissions from Wood Burning Appliances Including Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation Potential, J. Aerosol Sci., 114, 21–30, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2017.08.014, 2017. a
Keller, A., Kalbermatter, D. M., Wolfer, K., Specht, P., Steigmeier, P., Resch, J., Kalberer, M., Hammer, T., and Vasilatou, K.: The Organic Coating Unit, an All-in-One System for Reproducible Generation of Secondary Organic Matter Aerosol, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 56, 947–958, https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2022.2110448, 2022. a, b
Laj, P., Bigi, A., Rose, C., Andrews, E., Lund Myhre, C., Collaud Coen, M., Lin, Y., Wiedensohler, A., Schulz, M., Ogren, J. A., Fiebig, M., Gliß, J., Mortier, A., Pandolfi, M., Petäja, T., Kim, S.-W., Aas, W., Putaud, J.-P., Mayol-Bracero, O., Keywood, M., Labrador, L., Aalto, P., Ahlberg, E., Alados Arboledas, L., Alastuey, A., Andrade, M., Artíñano, B., Ausmeel, S., Arsov, T., Asmi, E., Backman, J., Baltensperger, U., Bastian, S., Bath, O., Beukes, J. P., Brem, B. T., Bukowiecki, N., Conil, S., Couret, C., Day, D., Dayantolis, W., Degorska, A., Eleftheriadis, K., Fetfatzis, P., Favez, O., Flentje, H., Gini, M. I., Gregorič, A., Gysel-Beer, M., Hallar, A. G., Hand, J., Hoffer, A., Hueglin, C., Hooda, R. K., Hyvärinen, A., Kalapov, I., Kalivitis, N., Kasper-Giebl, A., Kim, J. E., Kouvarakis, G., Kranjc, I., Krejci, R., Kulmala, M., Labuschagne, C., Lee, H.-J., Lihavainen, H., Lin, N.-H., Löschau, G., Luoma, K., Marinoni, A., Martins Dos Santos, S., Meinhardt, F., Merkel, M., Metzger, J.-M., Mihalopoulos, N., Nguyen, N. A., Ondracek, J., Pérez, N., Perrone, M. R., Petit, J.-E., Picard, D., Pichon, J.-M., Pont, V., Prats, N., Prenni, A., Reisen, F., Romano, S., Sellegri, K., Sharma, S., Schauer, G., Sheridan, P., Sherman, J. P., Schütze, M., Schwerin, A., Sohmer, R., Sorribas, M., Steinbacher, M., Sun, J., Titos, G., Toczko, B., Tuch, T., Tulet, P., Tunved, P., Vakkari, V., Velarde, F., Velasquez, P., Villani, P., Vratolis, S., Wang, S.-H., Weinhold, K., Weller, R., Yela, M., Yus-Diez, J., Zdimal, V., Zieger, P., and Zikova, N.: A global analysis of climate-relevant aerosol properties retrieved from the network of Global Atmosphere Watch (GAW) near-surface observatories, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 4353–4392, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-4353-2020, 2020. a
Lamberg, H., Nuutinen, K., Tissari, J., Ruusunen, J., Yli-Pirilä, P., Sippula, O., Tapanainen, M., Jalava, P., Makkonen, U., Teinilä, K., Saarnio, K., Hillamo, R., Hirvonen, M.-R., and Jokiniemi, J.: Physicochemical Characterization of Fine Particles from Small-Scale Wood Combustion, Atmos. Environ., 45, 7635–7643, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.02.072, 2011. a
Leni, Z., Ess, M. N., Keller, A., Allan, J. D., Hellén, H., Saarnio, K., Williams, K. R., Brown, A. S., Salathe, M., Baumlin, N., Vasilatou, K., and Geiser, M.: Role of Secondary Organic Matter on Soot Particle Toxicity in Reconstituted Human Bronchial Epithelia Exposed at the Air–Liquid Interface, Environ. Sci. Technol., 56, 17007–17017, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c03692, 2022. a
Maricq, M. M.: Examining the Relationship Between Black Carbon and Soot in Flames and Engine Exhaust, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 48, 620–629, https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2014.904961, 2014. a
Müller, K., Spindler, G., Maenhaut, W., Hitzenberger, R., Wieprecht, W., Baltensperger, U., and ten Brink, H.: INTERCOMP2000, a campaign to assess the comparability of methods in use in Europe for measuring aerosol composition, Atmos. Environ., 38, 6459–6466, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.08.031, 2004. a
Panteliadis, P., Hafkenscheid, T., Cary, B., Diapouli, E., Fischer, A., Favez, O., Quincey, P., Viana, M., Hitzenberger, R., Vecchi, R., Saraga, D., Sciare, J., Jaffrezo, J. L., John, A., Schwarz, J., Giannoni, M., Novak, J., Karanasiou, A., Fermo, P., and Maenhaut, W.: ECOC comparison exercise with identical thermal protocols after temperature offset correction – instrument diagnostics by in-depth evaluation of operational parameters, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 779–792, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-779-2015, 2015. a, b
Petzold, A., Ogren, J. A., Fiebig, M., Laj, P., Li, S.-M., Baltensperger, U., Holzer-Popp, T., Kinne, S., Pappalardo, G., Sugimoto, N., Wehrli, C., Wiedensohler, A., and Zhang, X.-Y.: Recommendations for reporting ”black carbon” measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 8365–8379, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8365-2013, 2013. a
Pöschl, U.: Atmospheric Aerosols: Composition, Transformation, Climate and Health Effects, Angew. Chem. Int. Edit., 44, 7520–7540, https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200501122, 2005. a
Resch, J., Wolfer, K., Barth, A., and Kalberer, M.: Technical note: Effects of storage conditions on molecular-level composition of organic aerosol particles, EGUsphere [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-840, 2023. a
Rigler, M., Drinovec, L., Lavrič, G., Vlachou, A., Prévôt, A. S. H., Jaffrezo, J. L., Stavroulas, I., Sciare, J., Burger, J., Kranjc, I., Turšič, J., Hansen, A. D. A., and Močnik, G.: The new instrument using a TC–BC (total carbon–black carbon) method for the online measurement of carbonaceous aerosols, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 4333–4351, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-4333-2020, 2020. a
Schmid, H., Laskus, L., Jürgen Abraham, H., Baltensperger, U., Lavanchy, V., Bizjak, M., Burba, P., Cachier, H., Crow, D., Chow, J., Gnauk, T., Even, A., ten Brink, H. M., Giesen, K.-P., Hitzenberger, R., Hueglin, C., Maenhaut, W., Pio, C., Carvalho, A., Putaud, J.-P., Toom-Sauntry, D., and Puxbaum, H.: Results of the “Carbon Conference” International Aerosol Carbon Round Robin Test Stage I, Atmos. Environ., 35, 2111–2121, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00493-3, 2001. a
Stephens, M., Turner, N., and Sandberg, J.: Particle identification by laser-induced incandescence in a solid-state laser cavity, Appl. Optics, 42, 3726–3736, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.42.003726, 2003. a
Subramanian, R., Khlystov, A. Y., Cabada, J. C., and Robinson, A. L.: Positive and Negative Artifacts in Particulate Organic Carbon Measurements with Denuded and Undenuded Sampler Configurations Special Issue of Aerosol Science and Technology on Findings from the Fine Particulate Matter Supersites Program, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 38, 27–48, https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820390229354, 2004. a
Szopa, S., Naik, V., Adhikary, B., Artaxo, P., Berntsen, T., Collins, W., Fuzzi, S., Gallardo, L., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Klimont, Z., Liao, H., Unger, N., and Zanis, P.: Short-Lived Climate Forcers, in: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S., Péan, C., Berger, S., Caud, N., Chen, Y., Goldfarb, L., Gomis, M., Huang, M., Leitzell, K., Lonnoy, E., Matthews, J., Maycock, T., Waterfield, T., Yelekçi, O., Yu, R., and Zhou, B., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 817–922, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.008, 2021. a, b
Weingartner, E., Saathoff, H., Schnaiter, M., Streit, N., Bitnar, B., and Baltensperger, U.: Absorption of light by soot particles: determination of the absorption coefficient by means of aethalometers, J. Aerosol Sci., 34, 1445–1463, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(03)00359-8, 2003. a
Zhang, X. and McMurry, P. H.: Evaporative losses of fine particulate nitrates during sampling, Atmos. Environ. A-Gen., 26, 3305–3312, https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-1686(92)90347-N, 1992. a
Short summary
Ultra-fine airborne carbon particles affect climate and health, but measuring them poses many challenges. This paper presents an innovative device called FATCAT that enables unattended and continuous measurement of these particles over extended periods of time. We detail FATCAT's performance, demonstrate its compatibility with established methods and introduce the unique feature of fast thermograms, a novel approach to further understand real-world samples containing carbonaceous particles.
Ultra-fine airborne carbon particles affect climate and health, but measuring them poses many...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint