Aerosol Research
Aerosol Research
Aerosol Research
Articles | Volume 2, issue 2
Articles | Volume 2, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-2-271-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-2-271-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 2, issue 2
Research article
 | 
26 Sep 2024
Research article |  | 26 Sep 2024

Comparison of size distribution and electrical particle sensor measurement methods for particle lung deposited surface area (LDSAal) in ambient measurements with varying conditions

Teemu Lepistö, Henna Lintusaari, Laura Salo, Ville Silvonen, Luis M. F. Barreira, Jussi Hoivala, Lassi Markkula, Jarkko V. Niemi, Jakub Ondracek, Kimmo Teinilä, Hanna E. Manninen, Sanna Saarikoski, Hilkka Timonen, Miikka Dal Maso, and Topi Rönkkö

Viewed

Total article views: 326 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
243 59 24 326 36 11 12
  • HTML: 243
  • PDF: 59
  • XML: 24
  • Total: 326
  • Supplement: 36
  • BibTeX: 11
  • EndNote: 12
Views and downloads (calculated since 17 May 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 17 May 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 326 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 315 with geography defined and 11 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 26 Sep 2024
Download
Short summary
The performances of different particle lung-deposited surface area (LDSAal) measurement methods (Partector, ELPI+, SMPS/DMPS) were compared in ambient conditions. As LDSAal is a health-relevant metric and rather easy to utilise in air quality monitoring, it is crucial to know how the different methods agree, as there are clear differences in their operation. In all, a comparison of different methods can be complicated; still, the methods agree rather well in terms of local pollution (< 400 nm).
Read more
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint