Articles | Volume 2, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-2-271-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-2-271-2024
Research article
 | 
26 Sep 2024
Research article |  | 26 Sep 2024

Comparison of size distribution and electrical particle sensor measurement methods for particle lung deposited surface area (LDSAal) in ambient measurements with varying conditions

Teemu Lepistö, Henna Lintusaari, Laura Salo, Ville Silvonen, Luis M. F. Barreira, Jussi Hoivala, Lassi Markkula, Jarkko V. Niemi, Jakub Ondracek, Kimmo Teinilä, Hanna E. Manninen, Sanna Saarikoski, Hilkka Timonen, Miikka Dal Maso, and Topi Rönkkö

Viewed

Total article views: 1,668 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,068 379 221 1,668 144 62 114
  • HTML: 1,068
  • PDF: 379
  • XML: 221
  • Total: 1,668
  • Supplement: 144
  • BibTeX: 62
  • EndNote: 114
Views and downloads (calculated since 17 May 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 17 May 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,668 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,654 with geography defined and 14 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 08 Jan 2026
Download
Short summary
The performances of different particle lung-deposited surface area (LDSAal) measurement methods (Partector, ELPI+, SMPS/DMPS) were compared in ambient conditions. As LDSAal is a health-relevant metric and rather easy to utilise in air quality monitoring, it is crucial to know how the different methods agree, as there are clear differences in their operation. In all, a comparison of different methods can be complicated; still, the methods agree rather well in terms of local pollution (< 400 nm).
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint