Articles | Volume 4, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-4-211-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-4-211-2026
Research article
 | 
11 Jun 2026
Research article |  | 11 Jun 2026

Numerical study of the collection of aerosol particles by falling deformable drops

Thibaut Ménard, Emmanuel Reyes, Wojciech Aniszewski, Pascal Lemaitre, and Emmanuel Belut

Related authors

Microphysical modelling of aerosol scavenging by different types of clouds: description and validation of the approach
Pascal Lemaitre, Arnaud Quérel, Alexis Dépée, Alice Guerra Devigne, Marie Monier, Thibault Hiron, Chloé Soto Minguez, Daniel Hardy, and Andrea Flossmann
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 9713–9732, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9713-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9713-2024, 2024
Short summary
Performance evaluation of a semivolatile aerosol dichotomous sampler (SADS) for exposure assessment: impact of design issues
Noredine Rekeb, Benjamin Sutter, Emmanuel Belut, Evelyne Géhin, and Raymond Olsen
Aerosol Research, 2, 183–198, https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-2-183-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-2-183-2024, 2024
Short summary
Below-cloud scavenging of aerosol by rain: a review of numerical modelling approaches and sensitivity simulations with mineral dust in the Met Office's Unified Model
Anthony C. Jones, Adrian Hill, John Hemmings, Pascal Lemaitre, Arnaud Quérel, Claire L. Ryder, and Stephanie Woodward
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 11381–11407, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11381-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11381-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

AIAA: Guide for the Verification and Validation of Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations (AIAA G-077-1998 (2002)), American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-0421(02)00005-2, 1998. a
Aniszewski, W.: Improvements, Testing and Development of the ADM-τ Sub-grid Surface Tension Model for two-phase LES, J. Comput. Phys., 327, 389–415, 2016. a
Aniszewski, W., Ménard, T., and Marek, M.: Volume of Fluid (VOF) type advection methods in two-phase flow: A comparative study, Comput. Fluids, 97, 52–73, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2014.03.027, 2014. a
Balla, M., Kumar Tripathi, M., and Sahu, K. C.: Shape oscillations of a nonspherical water droplet, Phys. Rev. E, 99, 023107, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.99.023107, 2019. a
Beard, K.: Terminal Velocity and Shape of Cloud and Precipitation Drops Aloft, J. Atmos. Sci., 33, 851–864, 1976. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k
Download
Short summary
This study uses advanced computer simulations to explore how falling water drops remove airborne particles. It shows that, when drops deform and oscillate, their motion strongly affects how efficiently aerosols are captured. The model accurately predicts drop speed and shape, but capture rates can differ from experiments by up to an order of magnitude. These gaps likely stem from missing physical effects (evaporation), uncertainties in aerosol measurements, and numerical inaccuracies.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint