the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Assessing the sources of submicron airborne elements at two sites in the Fos-Marseille basin through rolling positive matrix factorization
Mathilde Brezins
Benjamin Chazeau
Nicolas Marchand
Amandine Durand
Grégory Gille
Romain Bourjot
Andre S. H. Prévôt
Jean-Luc Jaffrezo
Gaëlle Uzu
The contributions and evolution of fine elemental particulate matter (PM) sources were investigated in the Marseille–Fos basin (south of France) based on a 1-year-long (January–December 2023) study using online X-ray fluorescence (Xact) PM1 measurements. The region's intense anthropogenic activity and complex meteorological conditions make it an ideal case study for fine aerosol characterization. Given the limited information available on fine elemental sources in the area, a dual-site approach was implemented, combining an urban background site (MRS-LCP) and an industrial site (FOS) to distinguish between regional and local emission influences. Source apportionment was conducted using a rolling positive matrix factorization (PMF) method, implemented via the Source Finder Professional (SoFi) toolkit. Several tests were carried out to determine optimal rolling PMF parameters. Eventually, a 21 d rolling-window configuration was selected, resolving nine factors at FOS and eight at MRS-LCP, with seven similar factors detected at both sites. Among them, three were attributed to secondary aerosols, including sulfur photooxidation leading to sulfate-rich aerosols (S-rich factor) and the formation of halogenated reactive particulate species (Cl-rich and Br-rich factors). Additionally, biomass-burning-, shipping-, and dust-related factors were identified at both locations. In contrast, three industrial factors (steel industry, Zn-industrial, Pb-industrial) were detected at FOS, while only the steel industry factor appeared at MRS-LCP, suggesting downwind transport of industrial plumes from Fos-sur-Mer to Marseille under mistral- and thermal-breeze regimes. Furthermore, the comparison of the dynamic rolling PMF approach to static PMF analysis demonstrated higher dissimilarities across factors profiles, reflecting an enhanced ability of rolling PMF to capture seasonal variability in aerosol sources. Overall, this study highlights the dominant anthropogenic imprint on submicron PM elements and the effectiveness of dynamic source apportionment in complex coastal–industrial environments.
- Article
(2936 KB) - Full-text XML
-
Supplement
(5077 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Air pollution has long been recognized as a major threat to human health (Dockery et al., 1993), representing the leading environmental risk factor for premature mortality globally and the second leading overall risk factor for death (WHO, 2021). Fuller et al. (2022) estimated that it was responsible for 9 million premature deaths per year worldwide. Intensified anthropogenic activities, particularly urbanization, industrialization, and widespread fossil fuel use, further degrade air quality, presenting a double jeopardy as they impact both human health and the climate system (Schmale et al., 2014). In a context of rapid climate change, understanding the complex interplay of aerosols is crucial as climate change may further increase aerosol production (e.g., more frequent Saharan dust outbreaks, increased wildfire episodes, and volatile organic compound emissions from stressed vegetation) (Gomez et al., 2023; Bourtsoukidis et al., 2024; Pons et al., 2025). Climate change hotspots such as the Mediterranean basin are particularly at risk, with projections indicating more frequent and intense meteorological extremes that could trigger additional pollution episodes (Zittis et al., 2022; Jézéquel et al., 2025).
The city of Marseille (France) embodies these vulnerabilities. With its dense population and exposure to numerous pollution sources, it represents a highly complex and dynamic atmospheric environment. Anthropogenic activities in the region include one of the largest ports in the Mediterranean Sea, as well as major industrial facilities. In particular, industrial sites located in the northwestern suburbs of the Marseille–Fos basin are recognized contributors to Marseille's air pollution (El Haddad et al., 2013; Salameh et al., 2018; Chazeau et al., 2021). The diversity of pollution sources, combined with local meteorological conditions, such as frequent land–sea breeze circulations, favor the aging and formation of secondary aerosols (Puygrenier et al., 2005; Drobinski et al., 2007), effectively transforming the Marseille basin into a chemical reactor for atmospheric particles. This complexity has drawn significant scientific attention to the region (Bozzetti et al., 2017; Chevet et al., 2024; Dufresne et al., 2025). In particular, fine particulate matter smaller than 1 µm (PM1) is a major health concern due to its ability to penetrate deeply into the respiratory system (Kreyling et al., 2006), but it remains unregulated in France. Consequently, submicron aerosol composition and dynamics in the Marseille area have attracted growing scientific interest in recent years (El Haddad et al., 2013; Chazeau et al., 2021; Camman et al., 2024; Le Berre et al., 2025).
While several studies have characterized the organic fraction of submicron aerosols in Marseille (El Haddad et al., 2013; Bozzetti et al., 2017; Chazeau et al., 2022), source apportionment of airborne elements, including non-metals, metals, and metalloids, remains scarce (Camman et al., 2024). This is critical as many metallic elements such as Pb, Hg, As, Cr, Ni, and Cd are found to be toxic, bioaccumulative, and associated with carcinogenic, neurotoxic, or cardiovascular effects (Rose, 1983). Recent advances in automated, high-time-resolution energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence (ED-XRF) instrumentation (e.g., Xact 625i, Cooper Environmental Services) allow continuous, highly time-resolved measurements of a wide range of airborne elements (Furger et al., 2017; Tremper et al., 2018), offering new opportunities to assess airborne element source dynamics and temporal variability.
In this study, we aim to identify and characterize the sources of submicron airborne elements in the Marseille–Fos basin using the whole 2023 year of high-time-resolution online X-ray fluorescence (Xact) measurement data. To capture temporal variability in source profiles and contributions, we apply rolling positive matrix factorization (rolling PMF), a dynamic source apportionment approach recently introduced by Canonaco et al. (2021). This method improves upon conventional static PMF by capturing short-term seasonal variations in factor profiles. Although rolling PMF has been widely used for aerosol mass spectrometry (AMS) and aerosol chemical speciation monitoring (ACSM) datasets (Heikkinen et al., 2021; Tobler et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2021, 2022a, b; Lin et al., 2022; Via et al., 2022; Chazeau et al., 2022; Chebaicheb et al., 2023; Lei et al., 2025), its application to Xact data remains limited (Manousakas et al., 2025), and no application of the rolling PMF methodology to 1-year-long Xact data has been reported yet. This is particularly important because several non-metal elements measured by the Xact (e.g., S, Se, Cl, Br) can undergo rapid atmospheric transformations, which static PMF approaches may fail to capture.
2.1 Dual-site description
The Marseille–Fos basin is a semi-enclosed coastal basin in the northwestern Mediterranean, covering nearly 2500 km2 and including the Gulf of Fos-sur-Mer and the Bay of Marseille, the second most populated city in France. The region experiences intensive anthropogenic pressure due to major industrial, urban, and maritime activities (Fig. 1). The Berre Pond industrial area is one of the largest in France, encompassing steel manufacturing plants, oil refineries, petrochemical facilities, cement factories, and stone quarries, as well as the Fos-sur-Mer incinerator. Additionally, a major thermal power plant, the Gardanne facility, is located 20 km northeast of Marseille's city center (Fig. 1). In parallel, the Grand Port Maritime de Marseille (GPMM), the second-largest port in France, extends from Fos-sur-Mer to the northern part of Marseille. In 2023, the GPMM processed over 72 million t of goods and welcomed more than 4 million cruise passengers (https://www.marseille-port.fr, last access: 6 June 2025). It comprises the Fos industrial harbor (between Port-Saint-Louis and Fos-sur-Mer) and the Port-de-Bouc terminal at the entrance of the Berre Channel. Together, these facilities delimit the Gulf of Fos, forming the largest industrial-port complex in France. On the other side of the basin, previous studies have demonstrated that maritime traffic in the Bay of Marseille, including emissions from vessels at berth, contributes significantly to urban air pollution levels (Chazeau et al., 2021; Le Berre et al., 2025). Additionally, Marseille is characterized by intense vehicular activity as the city hosts the second largest car fleet in France (Bilan Annuel des Transports 2023, https://www.statistiques.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/, last access: 8 September 2025).
Figure 1Map of the Marseille–Fos basin. Locations of industrial plants were obtained from the SEVESO and IREP databases (https://data.ampmetropole.fr/, last access: 18 September 2025). Main ship transit routes were derived from MarineTraffic (https://www.marinetraffic.com/, last access: 28 February 2024). Major highways were sourced from Google Traffic (map data © 2015 Google). Background map layers were provided by Carto Positron (© OpenStreetMap contributors © CARTO) and Bing Satellite (Bing Satellite © Microsoft). The map was produced using QGIS 3.34.
The combination of such diverse anthropogenic activities generates a complex mixture of primary pollutants, which undergo chemical transformation and are transported across the Marseille–Fos basin. The region is characterized by high solar radiation during summer, promoting photochemical activity, including ozone formation and secondary organic aerosol (SOA) production (El Haddad et al., 2013; Chazeau et al., 2021). Prevailing wind regimes in the Marseille–Fos basin are dominated by the mistral and thermal breezes, both playing a major role in pollutant transport. The mistral, a synoptic northwesterly wind (270–360°) channeled through the Rhône Valley, would be expected to affect both sites similarly; however, it was reported 54 % of the time at Fos-sur-Mer and 35 % at Marseille in 2023, likely reflecting local shielding effects from surrounding hills and vegetation. Thermal breezes were observed approximately 40 % of the time in the Marseille–Fos basin. These are characterized by nocturnal land breezes (5–90°) and daytime sea breezes (210–270° in Marseille; 120—240° in Fos-sur-Mer). In addition, the region is occasionally impacted by strong southeasterly Sirocco winds, which transport Saharan dust across the Mediterranean (Flaounas et al., 2009). In 2023, six dust episodes, lasting from 1 to 4 d, were recorded. The basin's complex topography further modulates atmospheric transport. Marseille is also bordered by mountainous terrain, with the Massif de l'Étoile to the north (778 m a.s.l.) and the Calanques massifs to the south (646 m a.s.l.). The combination of complex terrain and variable meteorological conditions results in substantial variability in the boundary layer height (BLH), ranging from over 1000 m during summer mistral events to below 500 m under wintertime thermal-breeze conditions (Riandet et al., 2023), thus affecting aerosol dispersion and dilution.
To investigate the atmospheric composition in this complex environment, data from two air quality monitoring supersites were used, both operated by the Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry (LCE) and AtmoSud (https://www.atmosud.org, last access: 6 June 2025). The first one, the Marseille-Longchamp Observatory supersite (MRS-LCP), is located in the center of Marseille, in Longchamp Park near the Marseille Observatory (43°18′18.84′′ N, 5°23′40.89′′ E; 71 m a.s.l.). Continuously operating for nearly 2 decades, this station is classified as an urban background site according to European Environment Agency criteria (Larssen et al., 1999). Positioned approximately 3 km inland from the Mediterranean coastline and within the city center, it is representative of typical coastal urban air quality conditions. MRS-LCP has been featured in multiple studies (El Haddad et al., 2011; Salameh et al., 2018; Chazeau et al., 2021; Camman et al., 2024) and has recently been selected as a French urban super site for the new EU regulation. The second site, the Fos-Carabins Monitoring Station (FOS, 43°27′32.092′′ N, 4°56′4.412′′ E; 5 m a.s.l.), is located in the residential area of Fos Les Carabins but is classified as a peri-urban site under industrial influence due to its proximity to the port–industrial complex of Fos-sur-Mer and its exposure to emissions from surrounding industrial facilities, including the ones of Fos-sur-Mer (< 1 km southwest), and Port-de-Bouc (approximately 10 km southeast, Fig. 1). Like MRS-LCP, the FOS station is located approximately 3 km from the coastline. Despite being 40 km apart, meteorological conditions enable the transport of aerosol between both sites from several emission sources. Specifically, sea breeze events frequently carry industrial plumes inland toward Marseille (Puygrenier et al., 2005; El Haddad et al., 2013), while low mistral flows may facilitate downwind transport of pollutants from the Fos-sur-Mer industrial area toward the urban center. Therefore, both monitoring sites are strategically positioned to assess intra-basin transport and the interplay between urban and industrial sources.
2.2 Sampling and instrumentation
Submicronic aerosols were continuously sampled from 1 January to 31 December 2023 as part of the SHIPAIR (“SHIPping emission's contribution to AIRpollution in urban harbor area”) campaign (https://anr.fr/Project-ANR-21-CE22-0015, last access: 6 June 2025) at both sites. Each sampling station was equipped with a range of analytical instruments for aerosol and gas monitoring, as detailed in Table 1.
Table 1Overview of the instruments deployed during the field campaign at MRS-LCP and FOS monitoring stations. “X” indicate that the instrument was equipped at this site.
At both sites, aerosols for elemental analysis were continuously and automatically sampled using a PM10 inlet (Tisch environmental, Cleves, OH, USA) coupled with a PM1 impactor, operating at a flow rate of 16.7 L min−1. Airborne elements were quantified by energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence (ED-XRF) using the Xact 625i analyzer (Cooper Environmental Services, Edgartown, MA, USA). Briefly, particulate matter (PM) was collected onto a Teflon filter tape (PTFE membrane, 2 µm thickness, Cooper Environmental Services). Then, incident X-rays from the tube excite the inner-shell electrons of the sampled particles, generating element-specific secondary X-rays detected by a solid-state fluorescence detector. This enables both identification and quantification of elements (Currie, 1977; Furger et al., 2017).
The instrument is designed to simultaneously quantify up to 45 elements, from Al to Bi (Xact 625i Manual, Cooper Environmental Services, Table S1 in the Supplement). For MRS-LCP and FOS, 33 elements (Fig. S1 in the Supplement) and 27 elements (Fig. S2), respectively, were individually calibrated using pure element standards provided by the manufacturer.
The Xact 625i enables online sampling and analysis of airborne elements over extended monitoring periods (several months) at high temporal resolution. The sampling and analysis cycle ranges from 5 to 240 min. However, to allow for reasonable minimum detection limits (MDLs), a 60 min sampling and analysis cycle was selected for this campaign.
Nevertheless, there are some limitations to the use of the instrument. First, MDLs reported for the Xact 625i are generally higher than those obtained with offline elemental aerosol analysis methodologies (XRF or inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, ICP-MS) (Tremper et al., 2018; Cadeo et al., 2025). Moreover, due to the self-absorption effect for low-energy X-rays emitted by lighter elements (Z < 15) (Formenti et al., 2010), the Xact 625i cannot detect elements such as Na or Mg, while other elements such as Al or Si show higher MDLs (Table S1). Comparatively, SR (synchrotron radiation)-induced XRF and ICP-MS techniques allow the detection of a larger range of elements (SR-XRF: Z > 11; ICP-MS: Na, Mg) (Visser et al., 2015a; Furger et al., 2017). The lack of quantitative assessment of Na and Mg causes strong limitations for coastal sites like ours, where these elements provide key information on marine aerosols (e.g., fresh and aged sea salt; Pey et al., 2013).
Other ancillary continuous monitoring of regulated pollutants was conducted exclusively at the MRS-LCP. Mass concentrations of PM1, PM2.5, and PM10 were measured using a FIDAS 200 optical particle counter (PALAS, Germany). Data were recorded at a 15 min resolution throughout the entire measurement period. In parallel, NOx (M200E, Teledyne API, California, USA) and SO2 (M100E, Teledyne API, California, USA) were also measured continuously with the same 15 min time resolution, with additional SO2 monitoring using the same technique at FOS. Non-refractory (NR) PM1 was sampled using a time-of-flight aerosol chemical speciation monitor (ToF-ACSM, Aerodyne Research Inc., USA; Fröhlich et al., 2013) for the determination of organic aerosol (OA), NH, NO, SO, and Cl− concentrations. During the whole year, data were acquired and compiled at a 10 min time resolution through Igor-DAQ software, Tofware (Tofwerk, Thun, Switzerland). Particle number size distributions (PNSDs) in the submicron range were measured at MRS-LCP only, using scanning mobility particle sizers (SMPSs) with an ultrafine particle counter (model 3938, CE6 TSI Inc., Minnesota, USA, CPC 3752, classifier 3082) providing particle counts from 15 to 723 nm every 5 min in 55 size bins.
Black carbon (BC) analysis was carried out at both sites with aethalometer AE33 (Magee Scientific, CA, USA), operated with a PM2.5 inlet. The dual-spot sampling method (Drinovec et al., 2015) was used to correct for filter-loading artifacts (Lack et al., 2014). BC was further apportioned into BC liquid-fuel (BCLF) and BC solid-fuel (BCSF) components using the Aethalometer model (Sandradewi et al., 2008; Chazeau et al., 2021).
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) including cyclohexane, 1,2-dichloroethane, trichloroethene, tetrachloroethene, and BTEX (benzene; toluene; ethylbenzene; and o-, m-, and p-xylenes) were measured hourly at the FOS site using a VOC72M gas chromatograph equipped with a photo-ionization detector (Envea, France).
Meteorological data, including temperature, wind direction, and wind speed, were recorded at both sites with an Ultrasonic 3D anemometer USA-1 (METEK, Germany). Shortwave radiation and boundary layer height (BLH) for the Marseille–Fos area during 2023 were retrieved from the Open-Meteo meteorological database (https://open-meteo.com/, last access: 9 December 2025). Both stations were connected to automated data platforms (e.g., the eSAM system, Envea), enabling daily automated quality control and continuous data recording. Instrument and annual dataset visualization for both stations is accessible through the HERMES platform (HERald of the MEasurement Stations, https://hermes-aq.com/, last access: 6 June 2025).
2.3 Source apportionment methodology
Detailed information on the source apportionment methodology is provided in Sect. S1: PMF methodology. Briefly, positive matrix factorization (PMF) is a bilinear receptor model that decomposes a chemical matrix into factor time series and profiles, which can then be interpreted as emission sources (Paatero and Tapper, 1994). Unlike principal component analysis (PCA) or chemical mass balance (CMB), PMF imposes non-negativity and requires little a priori information, making it particularly suited for environmental applications. The model iteratively minimizes the weighted residuals (Q), with “robust” mode applied to downweight outliers (Paatero, 1999). Rotational ambiguity is addressed using the ME-2 solver, where the a-value approach constrains selected factors within predefined variability ranges (Paatero and Hopke, 2009). Finally, the bootstrap resampling method (Efron, 1979; Ulbrich et al., 2009) provides statistical uncertainty estimates by testing the stability of factors across perturbed datasets.
Yet, a stable statistical solution does not guarantee environmental meaning. For long-term datasets, covering several months to a full year, PMF factor profiles may exhibit seasonal variability that is not captured by the static PMF method. To address this, Parworth et al. (2015) introduced the rolling PMF approach, which applies PMF in a rolling window to capture temporal variability in factors. This method allows for the identification of short-term source behavior that would otherwise be averaged out in static analyses and has been shown to provide more environmentally interpretable results than conventional static PMF, especially in capturing short-term and seasonal atmospheric events (Lin et al., 2022; Guo et al., 2025). In this study, both static and rolling PMF analyses were applied to hourly trace element data at both the urban MRS-LCP and industrial FOS sites. Analyses were conducted using the SoFi Pro (Source Finder) toolkit (Datalystica Ltd., Villigen, Switzerland, Canonaco et al., 2013, 2021), an Igor-Pro-based program (WaveMetrics, Inc., Portland, OR, USA).
PMF results from both static and rolling approaches were compared in terms of their ability to capture the temporal variability of sources by analyzing the dissimilarity of the factor profiles using Pearson distance and standardized identity distance (PD-SID) analysis (S2: PD-SID; Belis et al., 2015; Pernigotti and Belis, 2018). While PD-SID has been widely used to assess factor homogeneity across multiple sites (Weber et al., 2019; Borlaza et al., 2021; Manousakas et al., 2022; Liu et al., 2025), few studies have reported its use for evaluating factor homogeneity at a single site (Ngoc Thuy Dinh et al., 2026). Additionally, cosine similarity, commonly employed to calculate correlations between mass spectra (Stein and Scott, 1994; Ulbrich et al., 2009), was adapted to elemental factor compositions (cosine distance, CD, S3: cosine distance) to assess the variability of PMF factor profiles between static and rolling approaches.
3.1 Data validation and Xact PMF matrix preparation
Over the year, airborne elements measured by the Xact contributed approximately 8 % to the reconstructed PM1 mass at MRS-LCP (S4: PM1 mass reconstruction at MRS-LCP, Figs. S3 and S4). A total of 18 elements were selected for PMF analysis at both sites (Figs. S1 and S2): S, Cl, K, Ca, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn, As, Se, Br, Cd, and Pb, along with Pd (specific to MRS-LCP) and Rb (specific to FOS). Element selection was based on the proportion of data below MDLs (BDL) using a threshold of 88 %, which is close to the 90 % BDL level applied in a previous Xact-PMF study at MRS-LCP (Camman et al., 2024). This threshold is higher than the 70 % BDL criterion adopted in another Xact-PMF study (Manousakas et al., 2022) in order to retain short but intense industrial events driven by anthropogenic markers such as Pb (82 % BDL at MRS-LCP). Some exceptions were made to maintain a consistent set of elements across both sites. Specifically, Mn (90.8 % BDL), Cd (92.7 % BDL), and Cr (94.6 % BDL) at MRS-LCP were kept to match the elements used at FOS for homogeneous PMF analysis. Another exception was made for Rb at FOS (96.3 % BDL), which proved to be a relevant tracer for biomass burning emissions during winter (Massimi et al., 2020). However, for the majority of elements, the BDL fraction was below 60 % (Tables S2 and S3).
The input matrix for the PMF analysis was constructed following the methodology proposed by Polissar et al. (1998): values below the MDL were replaced with MDL/2, and their associated uncertainties were set to 5/6 of the MDL. For values above the MDL, the error was computed as the square root of the quadratic sum of the MDL and the estimated measurement uncertainty from the Xact instrument (Reff et al., 2007; Camman et al., 2024). In addition, a cell-wise downweighting approach was applied to data with a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) below 2, as proposed by Visser et al. (2015b). For these low-SNR values, the associated uncertainty was replaced with a penalized error defined by the function 2/SNRij. The use of a cell-wise downweighting of the error matrix, rather than classical variable-wise downweighting, allows for a more balanced integration of the variables in the model while primarily considering data points above the detection limit.
Short-lived events (1 h to 2–3 d), such as Sirocco episodes, construction activities, or fireworks, were excluded from the dataset. These episodes disrupted factor analysis (e.g., dust, steel industry) but could not be attributed to a specific factor due to their chemical similarity as compared to other sources (e.g., Saharan dust and local dust, fireworks, and biomass burning). The methodology for their identification and exclusion is described in Sect. S5: Data correction (Fig. S5).
The ToF-ACSM data at MRS-LCP were also analyzed for the same period using rolling PMF following the ACSM Standard Operating Procedure established within the COLOSSAL project (https://www.cost.eu/actions/CA16109/, last access: 2 June 2026), as detailed in Chen et al. (2022a) and Chazeau et al. (2022). A total of five organic aerosol factors were resolved for the year 2023 (Fig. S6). Among them, the biomass burning organic aerosol (BBOA) displayed marked seasonal variability, with no contribution observed between May and September. The hydrocarbon-like organic aerosol (HOA) factor was predominantly associated with traffic emissions, while the cooking organic aerosol (COA) factor originated from food preparation activities. Two additional factors were attributed to long-range-transported secondary organic aerosols: more oxidized oxygenated organic aerosol (MOOOA) and less oxidized oxygenated organic aerosol (LOOOA). These results are consistent with previous studies at the MRS-LCP site (Chazeau et al., 2022) and will be used to support interpretations of elemental concentration variations.
3.2 Static PMF analysis for airborne elements
As limited information was available on Xact PMF factors in the region (Camman et al., 2024), static PMF analyses were first performed to define reasonable PMF solutions. Each site was treated independently to ensure site-specific interpretation. PMF solutions for the full 2023 dataset (YEAR), ranging from 5 to 12 factors, were evaluated to identify the most meaningful configuration for each site. Statistical diagnostics ( and unexplained variation, UEV) suggested optimal solutions of nine factors for MRS-LCP and eight for FOS (Fig. S7). However, examination of factor time series, daily trends, chemical composition, and geographical origins indicated that the most environmentally interpretable solutions were obtained with eight factors at MRS-LCP and nine at FOS (Table S4).
To investigate seasonal variability in source contributions, each PMF dataset was divided into four seasons: JF_D – January, February, December; MAM – March, April, May; JJA – June, July, August; and SON – September, October, November. Unconstrained preliminary runs revealed that some factors, such as the Cl-rich (Sect. 4.2.7) and the shipping (Sect. 4.2.1), exhibited strong seasonality at both sites and could not be clearly identified in some periods unless constrained. For instance, the shipping factor was not retrieved during winter at both sites (Tables S5 and S6), probably due to reduced sea breeze advection of shipping plumes (Chazeau et al., 2021). Similarly, during JJA, the Cl-rich factor was partly mixed with dust in unconstrained runs (Tables S5 and S6). Although dust may contain some residual Cl (Visser et al., 2015b), this is not consistent with the other seasons' PMF results. On the other hand, the shipping factor constrained during the winter season exhibits the same diurnal pattern, characteristic of passenger ship activity (Fig. S21, Sect. 4.2.1), as observed in summer, confirming the year-round environmental consistency of this factor.
To address these seasonal inconsistencies, following an approach similar to that of Chazeau et al. (2022), reference factor profiles were extracted from PMF solutions with a higher number of factors. An 11-factor solution enabled the identification of the shipping factor during JF_D and a distinct Cl-rich factor during JJA. These reference profiles were subsequently used to constrain the shipping and Cl-rich factors during JF_D and JJA, respectively, using the a-value approach, with random a values ranging from 0 to 0.5 in steps of 0.05 for the static PMF analysis and bootstrap runs.
Unlike the OA rolling PMF, where BBOA is resolved only from September to May, the Xact rolling PMF retained a biomass burning factor throughout the year. This choice reflects the expectation of year-round biomass burning emissions (e.g., wildfires, crop burning, barbecue) and avoids unrealistic redistribution of K into other factors. The relevance of this approach is supported by the year-round presence of BCSF and its consistent, albeit low, correlation with the final biomass burning factor during summer (R2 = 0.21 at MRS-LCP and R2 = 0.10 at FOS), as well as the still elevated biomass burning contribution (Fig. S22).
To assess the statistical uncertainty of the factor profiles, each seasonal PMF solution was then bootstrapped 100 times. To retain only environmentally meaningful runs, a set of custom criteria was applied to the bootstrap outputs. These criteria, based on the tracer element apportioned to each factor, proved to be more effective in filtering out “mixed” or inconsistent solutions. The complete list of criteria and associated thresholds for each PMF solution, as well as the percentage of retained bootstrap runs, are provided in the Supplement (Tables S7 and S8, respectively).
3.3 Rolling PMF parametrization
To capture the fine temporal variability of sources, rolling PMF was applied at both sites using the same dataset as for the static PMF. As preliminary static PMF solutions showed high similarity for common factors at both sites (Sect. 3.2), rolling PMF parameter optimization was performed only for the MRS-LCP dataset. The resulting optimal settings were then applied to the FOS dataset.
Canonaco et al. (2021) proposed a method to determine the best rolling PMF parameters. Rolling PMF implemented in SoFi allows for the adjustment of several key parameters, including rolling-window size, number of PMF repeats per window, and the number of days by which the window is shifted, in addition to static PMF options such as factor constraints and a-value configuration. Similarly to the approach used in Canonaco et al. (2021), we developed a method based on statistical indicators, namely , the percentage of unselected PMF runs, and the total UEV, to select optimal rolling PMF settings (rolling-window size, maximum a value, and PMF repeats per window). Previous rolling PMF studies with ACSM datasets (Canonaco et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2021) used the percentage of non-modeled data points to determine the minimum number of PMF repeats per window required to ensure 0 % non-modeled points. However, this criterion was not applicable here as nearly all modeled points met the selection criteria, even with a low number of repeats, likely due to differences in the selection criteria applied in both studies. We used instead the percentage of unselected runs. Window sizes of 7, 14, 21, and 28 d were tested, with the rolling window being shifted by 1 d over the entire dataset. Maximal a values of 0.2, 0.4, and 0.6 were explored, and PMF repeats per window were set to 1, 5, 10, and 50 successively. As testing all combinations of the three parameters (4 × 3 × 4 = 48 rolling PMF tests) would require many days of computation on a modern multicore PC, with each rolling PMF run taking approximately 6 h, we adopted a base-case configuration (rolling-window size = 14 d, a value = 0.4, PMF repeats per window = 10). In each rolling PMF test run, only one parameter was modified, while the other two were held constant (base-case values), following the approach of Canonaco et al. (2021).
The window size is a critical parameter in rolling PMF as it determines the ability to resolve the short-term temporal variability of evolving factor profiles and to assess the lifetime of aerosol sources. Previous studies on organic aerosol PMF have commonly selected 14 d windows (Parworth et al., 2015; Canonaco et al., 2021; Chazeau et al., 2022; Chen et al., 2022a, b; Via et al., 2022). In this study, statistical analysis (mean , percentage of unselected runs, and total UEV) indicated that both 14 and 21 d windows were acceptable (Fig. S8). However, some geochemical considerations supported the use of a 21 d window. First, Xact provides direct elemental quantification; consequently, redox changes without a phase change (e.g., ) are not observable, whereas the ACSM captures organic aerosol oxidation through changes in signatures. As a result, metallic aerosol signals measured by Xact are expected to exhibit longer apparent atmospheric residence times than organic aerosol components measured by the ACSM. Furthermore, the particularly dry conditions in 2023 (Bilan Climatique de l'année 2023, Météo-France, 2024, https://meteofrance.fr/sites/default/files/files/editorial/bilan_2023_web.pdf, last access: 6 June 2025) limited wet deposition, and metals, primarily found in fine particles, typically exhibit longer atmospheric lifetimes (Roy et al., 2019). Together, these factors justified the selection of a 21 d window for the final analyses.
As shown earlier (Sect. 3.2), the Cl-rich and shipping factors showed strong seasonality and therefore required constraints. Unlike the seasonal static approach, rolling PMF operates on the full annual dataset; reference profiles were thus selected from the periods in which each factor was most robustly resolved (e.g., summer for shipping and winter for Cl-rich, Tables S5 and S6). Constraints were applied using randomly selected a values, varying from 0 up to a maximum a value in increments of 0.05. The maximum a value was tested at 0.2, 0.4, and 0.6. This narrower range, compared with that explored by Canonaco et al. (2021), was chosen to avoid over-constraining the factors and to prevent unnecessary computational load. Sensitivity tests showed that the maximal a value had minimal influence on the key statistical indicators (Fig. S8), and a maximum a value of 0.4 was ultimately selected, consistently with the recommendations of Canonaco et al. (2021).
To determine the minimal number of PMF repeats per window, we evaluated both the percentage of unselected runs and the minimum number of PMF repeats per modeled day while varying the total repeats per window, with bootstrapping enabled. The percentage of unselected runs showed no significant variation with the number of PMF repeats per rolling window (Fig. S8). While this metric provides a general indication of the statistical robustness of the rolling PMF parametrization, it does not reflect the temporal variability in the model's ability to resolve source apportionment at specific times of the year. To better assess this aspect, we evaluated the number of PMF repeats per modeled day in the final solution (Table S9). A minimum threshold of 10 PMF repeats per modeled day was adopted, leading to a requirement of at least 50 PMF repeats per window. Finally, the detailed study of several rolling PMF solutions at MRS-LCP showed the best environmental accuracy and statistical stability for the 21 d rolling-window length, 1 d delay, and 50 repetitions per window, with the maximal a value set to 0.4.
PMF factors at both sites were extracted using the same selection criteria as in the static analysis (Sect. 3.2, Table S7), with additional conditions to improve factor classification. Specifically, the selected factor's score had to exceed that of the second-highest factor to avoid potential factor mixing, and each criterion score had to account for at least 30 % of its specific tracer (≥ 0.3). This additional condition was necessary to ensure a consistent classification of factors, especially given the wider variability in criterion scores allowed by the rolling approach (Figs. S9 and S10). Notably, while this variability reflects the challenges of applying selection criteria across the full annual dataset, it also highlights the strength of the rolling PMF method in capturing the temporal variability in factor composition.
4.1 Comparative analysis: static vs. rolling PMF approach
To compare factor profiles obtained from static and rolling PMF approaches, an extended analysis was performed for the eight factors resolved at MRS-LCP using both methods (static PMF for YEAR, JF_D, MAM, JJA, and SON and rolling PMF). First, comparing element apportionment for each method shows that the rolling PMF leads to lower UEV for most elements (Fig. S11). Furthermore, most factors, except the S-rich factor, exhibit higher S enrichment in the rolling solution, concomitant with a reduced S contribution in the S-rich factor itself (Fig. S12). Such differences are particularly relevant given the wide range of potential sources contributing to secondary sulfate formation (e.g., various industrial activities, shipping), while the accurate attribution of the sulfate origins remains challenging (Chazeau et al., 2021; Su et al., 2025). The more homogeneous S apportionment leads to enhanced sulfur enrichment in the shipping and Br-rich factors at both sites, as well as in the Pb-industrial factor at FOS only, resulting in higher mass contributions of these factors in the rolling PMF solution across all seasons (Fig. S13). An exception is observed for the shipping factor at FOS during winter, where a higher contribution is obtained with the static approach. However, the rolling PMF contribution appears to be more environmentally interpretable, given the reduced sea breeze advection during this period.
To further assess the intra-variability of factor profiles resolved by static and rolling PMF, all factor profiles obtained at MRS-LCP were extracted from the bootstrapped PMF outputs. This included 404 profiles from the static PMF analysis and 14 614 profiles from the rolling PMF analysis. Pairwise PD-SID and CD (2.3) were then calculated for each factor and each method (eight factors × two methods). For each factor, this resulted in profile comparisons, where n is the number of profiles obtained with a given PMF approach. Both PD-SID (Fig. 2a) and CD analyses (Fig. 2b) indicate larger variability in factor profiles resolved by the dynamic approach compared to the static one for both major (PD) and trace elements (SID). This trend was observed for all factors except the constrained ones (shipping, Cl-rich), highlighting the critical importance of reference profile selection when applying constraints (Sect. 3.2 and 3.3). The S-rich factor showed relatively low PD enhancement and CD under the rolling approach, consistently with the dominance of sulfur in the elemental mass and the persistence of large-scale sulfate formation from photooxidation in the basin (Sect. 4.2.9). By contrast, the Zn-rich factor exhibited PD-SID values above the range of homogeneous chemical profiles, suggesting possible contributions from multiple sources, similarly to what has been stated in Sect. 4.2.6.
Figure 2(a) PD-SID similarity plot of the factors obtained with the static (square) versus dynamic (round) PMF approaches. The blue-shaded area shows the limit of the homogeneous chemical profile. For each point, round and square markers indicate the average distance from the profile comparisons, and the error bars represent the standard deviation when comparing all pairs of factors for the 404 static profiles vs. the 14 614 dynamic profiles. (b) Cosine distance similarity plot of the factors from both PMF approaches (rolling on the left, static on the right for each bar).
To assess the temporal variability of factor composition within the rolling PMF approach, PMF runs were attributed to individual days of the dataset. Using a 21 d window, a 1 d shift, and 50 PMF repeats per window, each day was represented by approximately 50 selected PMF runs (after applying the selection criteria; Sect. 3.3), corresponding to all rolling windows including that day. For each factor, daily rolling PMF profiles were compared to the corresponding static (YEAR) profiles by calculating the CD (Fig. S14). The mean and standard deviation of these metrics were then derived for each factor. In organic aerosol PMF studies, CD values above ∼ 0.15 (θ > 30°) are generally considered to be indicative of weak similarity (Bougiatioti et al., 2014). The daily CD between rolling and static factor profiles shows minimal variation for the S-rich factor and for the constrained shipping and Cl-rich factors, consistently with previous results. In contrast, the Br-rich, Zn-rich, dust, steel industry, and biomass burning factors exhibit pronounced increases in CD (> 0.15) during specific periods of the year, indicating substantial temporal variability in source chemical composition that is effectively captured by the rolling PMF approach.
Detailed analyses of the daily CD for the biomass burning factor (Fig. S15) reveal large deviations during summer, associated with enhanced sulfur enrichment. This behavior is consistent with previously reported increases in S K ratios with the aging of biomass burning emissions (Viana et al., 2013). These results support the interpretation that biomass burning is mainly driven by fresh and local residential heating during winter, whereas summertime rolling profiles reflect distant sources (e.g., wildfires, agricultural burning, barbecuing), combined with enhanced photochemical conversion of SO2 into particulate sulfate under higher solar radiation. In contrast, the static PMF approach yields a biomass burning factor largely dominated by wintertime residential solid-fuel combustion and is therefore unable to adequately represent summertime biomass burning emissions.
Overall, these results demonstrate the improved ability of the rolling PMF approach to capture seasonal variability and short-term changes in aerosol composition. However, further work is needed to fully understand submicron airborne elements sources in the region and to assess the geochemical relevance of short-lived rolling PMF profiles.
4.2 Interpretation of PMF factors
Rolling PMF analysis of PM1 Xact data resolved nine factors at FOS and eight at MRS-LCP, including seven factors common to both sites (Figs. 3–6, S16–S19). These shared factors comprised S-rich, Br-rich, and Cl-rich factors associated with secondary aerosol formation, as well as biomass burning, dust, shipping, and steel industry. A Zn-rich factor was retrieved exclusively at MRS-LCP, while two additional industrial factors (i.e., Zn-industrial and Pb-industrial) were identified only at FOS. No distinct factor could be exclusively attributed to road transport emissions as non-exhaust traffic-related metals are predominantly associated with coarse particles (Bukowiecki et al., 2010; Visser et al., 2015b; Pant et al., 2017). Nevertheless, road transport may contribute to the steel industry and Zn-rich factors at MRS-LCP.
Figure 3Pie chart showing the average mass contribution of Xact rolling PMF factors for FOS (left) and MRS-LCP (right).
Figure 4Final rolling PMF factor profile for FOS (left) and MRS-LCP (right). The colored bar plots represent the factor profile contribution (left axis), while black markers indicate the relative contribution of each variable (right axis). The yellow-highlighted letters denote the two differing elements between both sites.
Figure 5Factor times series for the final rolling PMF solution. Shortwave radiation and boundary layer height (BLH) for the Marseille–Fos basin area during the year 2023 were obtained from Open-Meteo (https://open-meteo.com/, last access: 9 December 2025).
Figure 6Diurnal patterns for FOS (left) and MRS-LCP (right). The colored lines represent the median diurnal evolution of each factor, the dashed lines indicate the mean diurnal evolution, and the light-colored areas show the interquartile range.
Secondary aerosols dominate the submicron elemental mass at both sites, with the S-rich factor accounting for more than half of the total PM1 elemental mass. Biomass burning represents the second largest contribution. The dust factor contributes less than 5 % at both sites, consistently with the predominance of crustal material in the coarse fraction (Pey et al., 2013). Eventually, direct anthropogenic sources, including industrial factors (steel industry, Pb-industrial, Zn-industrial) and shipping, each contribute less than 7 % to the submicron elemental mass. Although these contributions to PM1 mass are relatively small, their potential health impact may be significant. Specifically, shipping and industrial combustion processes are known to emit particles in the ultrafine size range (Jonsson et al., 2011; Riffault et al., 2015; Momenimovahed et al., 2021), which can penetrate deeply into the respiratory system and cause adverse health effects (Kreyling et al., 2006).
4.2.1 Shipping
At MRS-LCP, shipping emissions contributed approximately 6 % to total PM1 during the summer of 2018 (Camman et al., 2024). In this study, shipping emissions contributed to 6.7 % and 3.3 % of the total element mass of the PM1 at FOS and MRS-LCP, respectively (Fig. 3). At both sites, this factor was composed mainly of sulfur (≥ 89 %) and accounted for the majority of V and Ni (> 88 %, Fig. 4), consistently with previous ED-XRF shipping emissions studies in Marseille (Le Berre et al., 2025) and other coastal cities (Scerri et al., 2018; Fossum et al., 2024). Slight Fe enrichment at MRS-LCP (2 %) may reflect ship maneuvering at berth (Le Berre et al., 2025).
Non-parametric wind regression (NWR, Figs. S16 and S17) analyses further confirmed the maritime origin of the shipping factor. At both sites, shipping plumes were advected inland by daytime sea breeze, especially between May and October (Figs. 6 and S20). Compared with MRS-LCP, the FOS site is less frequently influenced by sea breeze circulation (Fig. S20), likely intercepting shipping plumes more episodically and at a more aged stage. This is consistent with the higher sulfur fraction observed at FOS (96.8 ± 0.6 %) relative to MRS-LCP (89.4 ± 1.0 %), reflecting enhanced secondary sulfate formation during transport. The higher sulfur content also explains the larger average contribution of the shipping factor at FOS (34 ng m−3) compared with MRS-LCP (19 ng m−3; Fig. 3). Moreover, the industrial Fos-sur-Mer harbor hosts many tankers and cargo vessels awaiting port entry, as well as tankers transiting through the Berre Channel (MarineTraffic, https://www.marinetraffic.com, last access: 28 February 2024). The longer residence time of these vessels in the Gulf of Fos-sur-Mer may further contribute to the observed sulfur enrichment. Daily cycles further reflected port-specific activities (Figs. 6 and S21). Marseille's port mainly serves passenger ships, with peak ship movements in the early morning (04:00–07:00 UTC) and late afternoon (16:00–18:00 UTC), corresponding to two distinct peaks in the MRS-LCP shipping factor. In contrast, Fos-sur-Mer GPMM activity is dominated by cargo traffic, and the FOS shipping factor exhibited a flatter diurnal profile, with a slight midday increase likely driven by sea breeze rise rather than increasing shipping traffic.
Consistently with recent IMO regulations and the increased use of desulfurized fuel (Yu et al., 2021; Fossum et al., 2024), V Ni ratios have decreased compared to pre-IMO values (1.2 ± 0.2 at MRS-LCP, 1.6 ± 0.3 at FOS vs. approximately 2 in summer 2018; Camman et al., 2024). The slightly higher ratio observed at FOS may reflect a stronger industrial influence or the continued use of heavy fuel oil in combination with scrubbers on tankers and cargo vessels (Brezins et al., 2026). Another consequence of IMO 2020 regulation is that SO2, once a reliable tracer of shipping emissions at MRS-LCP (Lu et al., 2006; Chazeau et al., 2022), no longer correlated with the shipping factor in 2023, indicating an effective reduction in SO2 emissions.
4.2.2 Biomass burning
The biomass burning factor was identified at both sites and contributed to more than 20 % of the PM1 elemental mass concentration during winter (Fig. S22). It was primarily composed of K (> 66 %) and S (> 22 %), with trace elements such as Rb (only at FOS, not calibrated in MRS-LCP), Cu, Cr, and As (Fig. 4).
Both sites exhibited typical daily cycles, with peak concentrations between 05:00–09:00 and 19:00–23:00 UTC (Fig. 6), reflecting increased nighttime domestic heating. This trend closely aligns with the BBOA factor behavior reported at MRS-LCP and in previous studies (Viana et al., 2013; Chazeau et al., 2022). NWR analyses showed a clear land–breeze influence during winter from the 5–90° sector at both sites, consistently with biomass burning emissions transported by nocturnal land breeze (Figs. S23–S24). At FOS, an additional contribution was observed from the southeast (125–145°), possibly linked to mixing with industrial combustion sources in the Port-de-Bouc area. During summer (JJA), the factor's geographical origin at MRS-LCP suggests a stronger influence of local sources, whereas at FOS it exhibits a distinct southeastern origin associated with Pb-industrial activity (Sect. 4.2.3), which may indicate partial redistribution of K from other sources during this period (Figs. S23–S24).
Significant correlations with other combustion-related markers confirmed the origin of the factor. At MRS-LCP, it was correlated with BCSF (R = 0.78) and BBOA (R = 0.77) and with particle number concentrations in the 150–200 nm range (R2 = 0.59, Figs. S25–S26), consistent with the size of biomass burning aerosols, which typically range from approximately 100 (fresh) to 250 nm (aged) (Janhäll et al., 2010). At FOS, good correlations were observed with BCSF (R = 0.80) and benzene (R = 0.69) (Fig. S27). However, benzene is also emitted by industrial sources: NWR analyses indicate that, while winter benzene shows a minor northeastern contribution, summer patterns are dominated by emissions from the Fos-sur-Mer and Port-de-Bouc industrial areas (Sect. 4.2.3, Fig. S28). This suggests that the biomass burning factor at FOS may include a partial industrial combustion contribution.
Finally, factors at both sites exhibited traces of As, Cr, and Cu, which could result from the combustion of wood treated with chromium–copper–arsenate (CCA) (Solo-Gabriele, 2002; Wasson et al., 2005), a pesticide historically used for timber preservation (Morais et al., 2021). Although CCA has been banned for commercial use in Europe since 2004, some industrial applications remain permitted, and no specific guidance has been provided regarding the incineration of CCA-treated wood (COMMISSION DIRECTIVE 2003/2/EC of 06/01/2003, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/es/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32003L0002&qid=1766167742441, last access: 9 January 2026).
4.2.3 Pb-industrial
This factor was exclusively identified at the FOS site. It represents 2.7 % of the yearly average of the total elemental mass. It was primarily composed of S (44 %) and K (28 %) and accounted for 93 % of the total Pb mass (Fig. 4). It did not exhibit any clear seasonal or diurnal variability (Figs. 6 and S22). Nevertheless, the NWR analysis revealed distinct contributions from the 235–260 and 110–150° sectors under relatively strong wind conditions, as well as a minor contribution from the 5–90° sector during winter only (Figs. S17 and S29). This latter contribution, typical of nocturnal land breeze transport, suggests a possible influence from residential solid-fuel combustion (Sect. 4.2.2). The presence of Cr, Cu, and As traces, similarly to the biomass burning factor, further supports this potential mixing of biomass burning and industrial combustion. However, the predominant southwesterly and southeasterly origins are indicative of industrial sources, likely associated with the Fos-sur-Mer and Port-de-Bouc industrial complexes, respectively.
Fine airborne Pb has long been recognized as a marker of anthropogenic activities (Clements et al., 2014; Riffault et al., 2015) and may originate from coal combustion (Alastuey et al., 2016; Rai et al., 2021), industrial processes (Moffet et al., 2008; Manousakas et al., 2022), and waste incineration (Riffault et al., 2015). In the area, coal combustion is exclusively associated with the steel industry in Fos-sur-Mer and therefore cannot account for the southeastern Pb contribution. A municipal waste incinerator located near the steel complex in Fos-sur-Mer, together with petrochemical and plastic-processing facilities in the Port-de-Bouc industrial area, where open burning has been reported, likely accounts for the observed Pb, As, and Cd emissions (Valavanidis et al., 2008; Kumar et al., 2015).
Overall, the elemental composition, dominated by S, K, Pb, and As, and the observed wind directions suggest a combustion-related industrial source. Note that the Pb NWR at MRS-LCP indicates a dominant local and northeasterly origin, inconsistently with an industrial influence from the Berre Pond area (Fig. S30). Nevertheless, a partial contribution from the west confirms an influence of industrial Pb at MRS-LCP. This signal was largely captured within the steel industry factor but was not sufficient to resolve a distinct Pb-industrial factor at this site (Fig. 4).
4.2.4 Steel industry
A factor enriched in Fe (FOS: 80 %, MRS-LCP: 51 %), and S (FOS: 12 %, MRS-LCP: 37 %) was identified at both sites, accounting for the majority of Mn mass (> 64 %) (Fig. 4). This factor represents 4.7 % and 6.9 % of the total element mass of the PM1 at FOS and MRS-LCP, respectively. At FOS, it clearly shows an origin from the 235–260° sector aligning the steel industry in Fos-sur-Mer (Fig. S17). Furthermore, the presence of spikes in the time series (Fig. 5) strongly suggests an origin of intense and nearby industrial activity (Ledoux et al., 2006; Moreno et al., 2011; Taiwo et al., 2014; Almeida et al., 2015; Kfoury et al., 2016; Rai et al., 2020b, 2021). This is not surprising as the Berre Pond hosts one of the largest steel plants in France, located approximately 2 km from the FOS sampling site (Fig. 1).
A previous study (Sylvestre et al., 2017) characterized fine particulate emissions downwind of this facility associated with high levels of Fe, S, Mn, and Zn (Fig. S31), further supporting this source attribution. However, the Mn Fe ratios observed here (FOS: 0.012; MRS-LCP: 0.006) are lower than those reported by Sylvestre et al. (2017) (0.056). This discrepancy likely reflects differences in particle size fraction (PM2.5 in Sylvestre et al. (2017) versus PM1 in the present study), as well as potential mixing of this factor with other Mn- and Fe-containing sources at MRS-LCP.
Notably, neither railway nor road transport emissions could be attributed to a single PMF factor at MRS-LCP, whereas the St-Charles train station is only approximately 1 km (260° direction) from MRS-LCP, and the station is located in the city center, where massive road traffic occurs (Fig. 1). Nevertheless, the presence of a local contribution (Fig. S16), together with reduced concentrations during weekends (Fig. S18), suggests a partial influence from road transport emissions (Manousakas et al., 2022, 2025) in the steel industry factor at MRS-LCP. However, as previously observed at this site (Camman et al., 2024), non-exhaust traffic emissions are only weakly captured in the submicron fraction since tire and brake wear particles are predominantly associated with particle sizes larger than 1 µm (Bukowiecki et al., 2010; Visser et al., 2015b; Pant et al., 2017).
The northwestern and southwestern contributions of the factor at MRS-LCP (Fig. S16), associated with mistral-breeze and sea breeze advection, respectively, suggest a factor primarily related to steel industry emissions originating from the Fos-sur-Mer industrial area. It was also marked by a sharp increase in diurnal activity between 04:00 and 07:00 UTC, followed by a gradual decline, relative to the onset of sea breeze (Chazeau et al., 2021, Fig. 6). In both cases, oxidation of industrial plumes and secondary sulfate formation from industrial SO2 emissions can occur (Marris et al., 2012; El Haddad et al., 2013; Chazeau et al., 2021), inducing S-factor enrichment and higher average mass contribution of the factor at MRS-LCP (Fig. 3). The additional presence of Pb in the MRS-LCP factor is consistent with previous findings at this site (Camman et al., 2024) and may reflect the inability of PMF to separate Pb-related industrial emissions (Sect. 4.2.3) from the steel industry emissions due to the spatial proximity of these emission sources.
4.2.5 Zn-industrial (FOS)
A factor composed of Zn > S > K > Fe > Mn > Cu > As, in decreasing order of abundance, was identified at FOS (Fig. 4), representing 2.9 % of the total elemental PM1 mass on a yearly average at this site. Airborne Zn has been previously attributed to several sources, including road transport, often associated with Sb (Camman et al., 2024; Manousakas et al., 2025; Charron et al., 2019); industrial processes (Manousakas et al., 2022; Riffault et al., 2015); waste incineration, particularly when associated with Pb and Cl (Moffet et al., 2008; Enestam et al., 2011); and solid-fuel combustion (Tissari et al., 2015; Rai et al., 2020b). NWR analysis indicated a dominant contribution from the 235–260° sector (Fig. S17), corresponding to the industrial zone of Fos-sur-Mer, where both a major steel plant and the waste incinerator are located. A minor contribution from the 10–50° sector suggests influence from land breezes, possibly associated with sea breeze return flow at night (Drobinski et al., 2007). According to the 2023 French Pollutant Release and Transfer Register (IREP, https://www.georisques.gouv.fr/donnees/bases-de-donnees/installations-industrielles-rejetant-des-polluants, last access: 9 January 2025), the steel plant in Fos-sur-Mer is the largest regional source of Zn emissions. Factor enrichment with Mn further supports its attribution to the steel industry (Sect. 4.2.4). However, Zn emissions from steel-making are typically associated with electric-arc and basic oxygen furnaces (European Commission, 2008), while the Fos-sur-Mer facility reportedly operates a blast furnace. Furthermore, no correlation was observed between the Zn-industrial factor and the steel industry factor, which may reflect emissions from distinct processes within the same facility. Enrichment in K and S also indicates a potential contribution from waste incineration. Overall, the diverse geographical origins and mixed chemical composition suggest that the Zn-Industrial factor represents a mixing of multiple sources, including steel industry and waste incineration. Despite the clearly distinct sources, PMF was unable to resolve multiple Zn-enriched factors.
4.2.6 Zn-rich (MRS-LCP)
A Zn-rich factor, dominated by Zn (53 %) with notable contributions from S and K, was identified at MRS-LCP (Fig. 4), accounting, on average, for 2.5 % of the annual PM1 elemental mass. Its daily cycle (Fig. 6), characterized by morning and evening peaks, is similar to that of the biomass burning factor (Sect. 4.2.2) and to road transport rush hours. As discussed in Sect. 4.2.5, various anthropogenic activities can contribute to airborne Zn emissions. However, its northeastern origin under low wind conditions suggests a source advected by nocturnal land breeze (Chazeau et al., 2021, Fig. S16), ruling out an industrial origin from Fos-sur-Mer (Sect. 4.2.5). A previous study at MRS-LCP associated a submicron Zn-enriched factor with tire and brake wear, based on the presence of Sb (Camman et al., 2024). In the present study, Sb was excluded due to a high proportion of measurement BDL (96 %). Although Cu can serve as a tracer of non-exhaust traffic emissions (Dubois et al., 2025), the Zn-rich factor shows little enrichment in Cu. This likely reflects the fact that metallic tracers of non-exhaust emissions are predominantly associated with particles larger than 1 µm (Pant et al., 2017). Weak correlations with HOA and BCLF (R < 0.35) further exclude road traffic emission as a major contributor (Fig. S25). Instead, the presence of K, similarly to the biomass burning factor (Sect. 4.2.2), together with its daily cycle (Fig. 6) and land breeze transport, points to solid-fuel combustion as a possible source. Nevertheless, its moderate seasonal variability (Fig. S22), its daily cycle (Fig. 6), and its substantial contribution to Pb concentrations (34 %) suggest little influence from waste incineration and indicate that this factor cannot be attributed to a single dominant source. Rather, it likely reflects a mixture of Zn-containing emissions, including combustion-related sources (e.g., biomass burning; Tissari et al., 2015), residual traffic emissions (Camman et al., 2024), and potentially waste-related activities (Enestam et al., 2011). Analysis of the factor chemical composition during different periods of the year (e.g., February and May) reveals marked seasonal variations in factor composition (Fig. S32), with higher enrichment in Fe and Ca in May and increased contributions of K, S, Cl, and Br in February. This variability suggests changing source influences, with a stronger contribution from road dust and non-exhaust traffic emissions during warmer periods and enhanced contributions from combustion-related and secondary processes in winter (Sect. 4.2.2, 4.2.7, and 4.2.8). The northeastern sector origin (5–90°) further supports the influence of locally transported and mixed aerosols, likely associated with nocturnal thermal-breeze recirculation processes (Drobinski et al., 2007).
4.2.7 Cl-rich
A Cl-rich factor, composed almost entirely of elemental Cl (FOS: 94 %, MRS-LCP: 88 %), was identified at both sites and accounted for at least 87 % of elemental Cl mass (Fig. 4) and 4.5 % and 3.6 % of the total elemental mass on a yearly average at FOS and MRS-LCP, respectively. It exhibited a strong seasonal pattern, with low average concentration in summer (< 10 ng m−3 at both sites) and higher average concentration in winter (FOS: 46 ng m−3; MRS-LCP: 40 ng m−3; Fig. S22). Such seasonality is consistent with previous studies linking fine particulate chloride to combustion-related emissions or secondary formation from gaseous chlorine species (Visser et al., 2015b; Le Breton et al., 2018; Tobler et al., 2020; Rai et al., 2021; Chazeau et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2023; Pawar et al., 2023; Masoud et al., 2023). Primary sources of particulate and gaseous chlorine include biomass burning (e.g., KCl, NH4Cl), coal combustion, crop residue burning, industrial activities (e.g., Cl-VOCs, steel industry), and sea salt dechlorination (Keene et al., 1999; Wang et al., 2017; Ding et al., 2020; Peng et al., 2021). Chlorine gases may further react with NOx and N2O5, leading to ClNO2 formation in the particle phase, followed by rapid partitioning into the gas phase (Thornton et al., 2010; Simpson et al., 2015; Le Breton et al., 2018; Ahern et al., 2018). Combustion processes often emit chlorine alongside NOx, promoting ClNO2 production. Other reactive intermediates such as Cl2 and NOCl may also contribute to photochemically active Cl atom formation (Jordan et al., 2015).
The pronounced diurnal variability of the Cl-rich factor, peaking in the early morning and evening, with a sharp increase overnight and minimal activity around midday, indicates rapid ClNO2 partitioning into the gas phase (Simpson et al., 2015; Faxon et al., 2015; Le Breton et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2022; Wang et al., 2023; Pawar et al., 2023). This daily cycle is also similar to that of the biomass burning, BCSF, and chlorinated compounds from the ACSM and AE33 measurements (Fig. 6 and S33). Both seasonal and diurnal behaviors (Figs. 6, S22, and S33) support the attribution of the Cl-rich factor to secondary formation processes from gaseous chlorine species, mainly driven by combustion activities. At FOS, the Cl-rich factor correlated with both the biomass burning factor (R2 = 0.41, Fig. S34) and chlorinated volatile organic compounds (Cl-VOCs) associated with industrial activity (1,2-dichloroethyl: R = 0.57; tetrachloroethyl: R = 0.46; Fig. S27), pointing to a mixed origin.
The Cl-rich factor originating from various wind directions at both sites (Figs. S16 and S17) further supports a mixed origin of the factor, with a minor northeastern contribution, suggesting an influence from biomass burning transported via a nocturnal land breeze. A small contribution from the marine areas may indicate partial influence from sea salt dechlorination, although this was not considered to be a major source of fine particulate chloride in this study (Sect. S6: Sea salt dechlorination, Figs. S35–S36).
4.2.8 Br-rich
A second halogen-enriched factor was identified at both sites, though with a different composition. The Br-rich factor is primarily composed of S (> 57 %) and K (> 17 %) and is highly enriched in Br (88 % of Br at both sites) (Fig. 4). It represents 8.3 % and 7.4 % of the PM1 elemental mass based on a yearly average at FOS and MRS-LCP, respectively. Its moderate seasonal, diurnal, and weekly variabilities (Figs. 6, S18, S19, and S22), in contrast to the Cl-rich factor (Sect. 4.2.7), reflect a persistent background contribution, consistently with previous observations at MRS-LCP (Camman et al., 2024). However, similarly to the Cl-rich factor, NWR analysis (Figs. S16 and S17) revealed diverse origins for this factor. At both sites, enhanced contributions from marine sectors (south at FOS and southwest at MRS-LCP) suggest a partial influence from marine bromine emissions. In particular, previous work in the Fos-sur-Mer area has shown that chlorinated seawater is widely used for industrial cooling and ballast water treatment in cargo vessels, leading to elevated bromoform concentrations at the sea surface in the vicinity of industrial and port activities (from 0.22 to 10.22 ng m−3; Quivet et al., 2022). A similar practice in passenger vessels may occur at Marseille harbor. Reactive bromine species can then undergo atmospheric reactions to form particulate brominated compounds (Kothai et al., 2011; Simpson et al., 2015). At FOS, the southwestern origin also corresponds to the port-industrial area hosting a coal-powered blast furnace, suggesting a potential contribution from particulate Br formed via reactive bromine gases emitted during coal combustion (Lee et al., 2018; Rai et al., 2021; Peng et al., 2021).
At MRS-LCP, the Br-rich factor showed a major contribution from the southeastern sector (105–135°) under elevated wind speeds, corresponding to two synoptic regimes: Sirocco (removed from the dataset, Sect. 3.1, Fig. S5) and the “marine” wind, typically observed during fall and spring (Chazeau et al., 2021). Although observed only occasionally, the marine wind traveled extensively over the Mediterranean Sea, potentially contributing to the sulfur and bromine enrichment of this factor. Another potential contributor is a chemical facility located approximately 10 km east of MRS-LCP, along the 105° sector (Fig. 1), which has reported bromine use and past incidents involving gaseous bromine leaks (bouches-du-rhône.data.gouv.fr, 2013; https://www.georisques.gouv.fr, last access: 9 January 2026). Finally, minor contributions from the northeastern sector (5–90°) suggest aerosol nocturnal transport with sea breeze return flow, similarly to the Zn-rich and the Cl-rich factors (Sect. 4.2.6 and 4.2.7) (Drobinski et al., 2007), further supporting the secondary origin of this factor.
4.2.9 S-rich
The S-rich factor is by far the most abundant (Fig. 3), contributing to more than 50 % of the total measured elemental mass based on a yearly average for both sites. It is mainly composed of S (95 %), with elevated Se traces (approximately 35 % of Se) at both sites, and accounts for 73 % and 79 % of elemental S mass at FOS and MRS-LCP, respectively (Fig. 4). The S-rich aerosols are typically attributed to oxidation of SO2 to sulfate (SO) or to direct sulfate emission (Visser et al., 2015b; Rai et al., 2020a, b, 2021; Manousakas et al., 2022, 2025), originating from both local industrial and port activities, as well as regional shipping emissions across the Mediterranean basin (Chazeau et al., 2021).
Notably, S-enriched factors are often associated with Se (Weber et al., 2019) as both elements share major anthropogenic sources, such as metal production, coal, fuel, and biomass combustion, as well as natural sources such as sea salt and volcanic activity (Eldred, 1997; Kuittinen et al., 2024; Su et al., 2025). Both elements are primarily emitted into the gas phase and then are converted into particulate forms at different rates, leading to decreasing Se S ratios with aerosol aging (Zhuang et al., 1999; Wen and Carignan, 2007; Liu et al., 2021). In this study, Se S ratios were 1.9 × 104 at FOS and 1.2 × 104 at MRS-LCP, within the lower range of previously reported values (1.7 × 104 in PM2.5, Kumar et al., 2025; 3.2 × 104 in PM10, Rai et al., 2020b). In the area, the only identified coal combustion source is the blast furnace of the steel industry in Fos-sur-Mer, but those ratios suggest limited influence from coal combustion emissions.
NWR analysis points to a dominant contribution from the sea at both sites (Figs. S16 and S17), consistently with particulate S emissions from shipping and seawater, or secondary formation in the port areas of the Marseille–Fos basin. Previous work at MRS-LCP reported elevated sulfate levels from major shipping routes, highlighting the continued importance of shipping emissions in sulfate production (Chazeau et al., 2021), even after SO2 reductions (Sect. 4.2.1). The implementation of IMO regulations has led to a substantial decrease in SO2 emissions from shipping (up to ∼ 77 %; IMO), limiting its use as a direct tracer of shipping activity compared to what was reported in earlier studies conducted at this site (Chazeau et al., 2022). However, the potential use of scrubbers may still result in direct sulfate emissions from ships (Kuittinen et al., 2024), thereby partially maintaining the shipping contribution to sulfate. Overall, while shipping-related SO2 emissions have likely decreased, industrial activity and regional transport of aged marine emissions over the Mediterranean remain important contributors to the sulfate observed at MRS-LCP.
Assuming all S is in the form of SO, reconstructed sulfate from elemental S (Xact) strongly correlates with non-refractory SO from ToF-ACSM (R2 = 0.91, slope = 0.99; Fig. S37). This confirms that sulfates are the dominant particulate form of sulfur measured by the Xact, in line with findings across Europe (Furger et al., 2017: R2 = 0.85, slope = 1.32, Xact in PM10 and ACSM in PM1; Tremper et al., 2018: R2 = 0.93, slope = 1.41, Xact in PM2.5 and ACSM in PM1). The larger slopes observed in previous studies likely reflect differences in particle size fractions sampled by the Xact and ACSM instruments, while operating both instruments in PM1 led to reduced size-related biases in this study. Time series at both sites and ToF-ACSM SO at MRS-LCP indicate an optimal sulfate production period from January to mid-October, followed by a sharp decline, likely linked to a sudden meteorological shift after a Sirocco event in mid-October (Fig. S38). Seasonal and diurnal patterns (enhanced activity between 10:00 and 15:00 UTC, coinciding with peak solar radiation; Figs. 6 and S38) confirm that this factor is strongly driven by secondary sulfate formation under high photochemical activity and stagnant conditions (El Haddad et al., 2013; Salameh et al., 2015; Chazeau et al., 2021).
4.2.10 Dust
The dust factor is primarily composed of Ca (> 50 %), with significant contributions from Ti at both sites (FOS: 51 %, MRS-LCP: 35 %), alongside contributions of S, Fe, and K (Fig. 4). Although crustal material is generally associated with coarse particles (Pey et al., 2013), mechanical processes such as sandblasting may also explain its presence in the PM1 fraction (Gomes et al., 1990). However, this factor contributed only modestly to PM1 elemental aerosol mass (< 5 %) at both sites (Fig. 3).
Dust can refer to various sources, including (a) short-range resuspension dust, linked to road dust or construction activities (Belis et al., 2011; Dall'Osto et al., 2013; Visser et al., 2015b; Manousakas et al., 2022); (b) medium-range-transported dust such as industrial dust (Riffault et al., 2015, Almeida et al., 2020) or construction dust; and (c) long-range transport of crustal material with strong wind regimes like the mistral or Sirocco (Flaounas et al., 2009). NWR analyses at both sites point to a dominant contribution from crustal material transported during mistral episodes (275–360° sector, Figs. S16 and S17). However, the observed diurnal and weekly patterns display daytime peaks predominantly on weekdays, consistently with local resuspension processes driven by road traffic (Figs. 6, S18, and S19). These cycles are also similar to those of the steel industry factor at both sites (Sect. 4.2.4), suggesting possible partial mixing between the two sources. This is also supported by the partial 235–260° sector origin of the factor at FOS and by the reported elevated Ca concentrations downwind of the blast furnace unit at the Fos-sur-Mer steel industry facility (Sylvestre et al., 2017, Figs. S17 and S31). This is consistent with previous findings indicating a mixture of dust and steel industry emissions, obtained with the source apportionment approach (Taiwo et al., 2014).
This year-long source apportionment study at two sites provides a comprehensive picture of submicron elemental aerosols across the Marseille–Fos basin using high-resolution Xact PM1 measurements combined with a dynamic rolling PMF approach. The sites, MRS-LCP (urban background) and FOS (industrial), are located on opposite sides of the basin and are influenced by complex regional meteorological conditions that facilitate inter-site aerosol transport. A novel dynamic source apportionment approach was applied using a 21 d rolling-window PMF via the SoFi Pro toolkit. This dynamic framework allowed a more realistic representation of changing emission patterns compared with a static PMF and atmospheric processes in a complex coastal–industrial environment characterized by frequent wind shifts and inter-site air mass exchanges.
The analysis resolved nine PMF factors at FOS and eight at MRS-LCP, with seven factors common to both sites. Among these seven factors, three were attributed to secondary aerosol formation: the S-rich (FOS: 52 %; MRS-LCP: 60.3 %), Cl-rich (FOS: 4.5 %; MRS-LCP: 3.6 %), and Br-rich (FOS: 8.3 %; MRS-LCP: 7.4 %) factors. Biomass burning was the second-largest contributor at both sites (FOS: 14 %; MRS-LCP: 12.5 %). As expected given the intense harbor activity in the region, a shipping factor was identified (FOS: 6.7 %; MRS-LCP: 3.3 %), with episodic peaks exceeding 400 ng m−3 that can last 1–3 h. A dust-related factor, linked to both long-range transport and local resuspension, was also observed at both sites (FOS: 4.3 %; MRS-LCP: 3.5 %). A non-ascribed Zn-rich factor was retrieved exclusively at MRS-LCP (2.5 %), while two additional industrial factors were resolved only at FOS, namely a Pb-industrial factor (2.7 %) and a Zn-industrial factor (2.9 %), associated with waste incineration and steel production. A steel industry factor was also identified at MRS-LCP (6.9 %), though with differences in composition. These differences suggest both the mixing of industrial emissions and the formation of secondary aerosols during plume transport from FOS to MRS-LCP. These results clearly demonstrate that emissions from the Fos-sur-Mer industrial area influence air quality throughout the basin, transported under alternating mistral and sea–land breeze regimes.
A total of 10 distinct elemental sources were characterized in the MRS-FOS basin, five of which (shipping, biomass burning, Pb-industrial, Zn-industrial, and steel industry) stem directly from primary anthropogenic emissions. The predominance of human-related sources underscores the strong industrial and maritime imprint on the region's atmospheric composition. This issue is further amplified by the basin's topography and population density, which enhance population exposure to a complex mixture of potentially harmful airborne elements. Considering recent epidemiological findings linking residences near the Berre industrial zone with increased chronic-disease prevalence, including cancer and diabetes (Jeanjean et al., 2023), the present results call for closer integration between atmospheric chemistry and health research. Future studies should focus on the toxic potential of these resolved submicron sources to better quantify their public health implications in industrialized coastal regions.
The PD-SID and CD code used in this work can be accessed through Zenodo: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18374603 (Brezins, 2026b).
All the rolling PMF Xact results from this work can be accessed through Zenodo: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18374331 (Brezins, 2026a).
The supplement related to this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-4-231-2026-supplement.
MB, BC, NM, JLJ, GU, and BDA conceived the study. AD, GG, and RB provided technical assistance during the experiments. AP provided the Xact instrument used for the measurements at the FOS site. RB supported the deployment of the Xact instrument at the FOS measurement site. AD contributed to the Xact data analysis. BC conducted the ToF-ACSM data analysis. MB conducted the Xact data analysis and wrote the paper, with contributions from all of the co-authors.
The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.
All outputs were reviewed and edited by Mathilde Brezins, who takes full responsibility for the final content. All of the final wording reflects Mathilde Brezins's own edits and judgment.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
The authors would like to thank the AtmoSud technical team and Brice Temime-Roussel for the instrument maintenance and calibration at the FOS and MRS-LCP stations. Mathilde Brezins would also like to thank Anna Tobler and Francesco Canonaco for their regular support and assistance with the SoFi toolkit debugging. Mathilde Brezins acknowledges the use of the ChatGPT AI tool for Python script correction and for initial proofreading and grammar improvement during the preparation of the paper.
This research has been supported by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (SHIPAIR, grant no. ANR-21-CE22-0015). This study was also supported by AtmoSud with regard to funding of the analytical instruments.
This paper was edited by Annele Virtanen and reviewed by two anonymous referees.
Ahern, A. T., Goldberger, L., Jahl, L., Thornton, J., and Sullivan, R. C.: Production of N2 O5 and ClNO2 through Nocturnal Processing of Biomass-Burning Aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 550–559, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b04386, 2018.
Alastuey, A., Querol, X., Aas, W., Lucarelli, F., Pérez, N., Moreno, T., Cavalli, F., Areskoug, H., Balan, V., Catrambone, M., Ceburnis, D., Cerro, J. C., Conil, S., Gevorgyan, L., Hueglin, C., Imre, K., Jaffrezo, J.-L., Leeson, S. R., Mihalopoulos, N., Mitosinkova, M., O'Dowd, C. D., Pey, J., Putaud, J.-P., Riffault, V., Ripoll, A., Sciare, J., Sellegri, K., Spindler, G., and Yttri, K. E.: Geochemistry of PM10 over Europe during the EMEP intensive measurement periods in summer 2012 and winter 2013, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 6107–6129, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-6107-2016, 2016.
Almeida, S. M., Lage, J., Fernández, B., Garcia, S., Reis, M. A., and Chaves, P. C.: Chemical characterization of atmospheric particles and source apportionment in the vicinity of a steelmaking industry, Sci. Total Environ., 521–522, 411–420, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.03.112, 2015.
Almeida, S. M., Manousakas, M., Diapouli, E., Kertesz, Z., Samek, L., Hristova, E., Šega, K., Alvarez, R. P., Belis, C. A., and Eleftheriadis, K.: Ambient particulate matter source apportionment using receptor modelling in European and Central Asia urban areas, Environ. Pollut., 266, 115199, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115199, 2020.
Belis, C. A., Cancelinha, J., Duane, M., Forcina, V., Pedroni, V., Passarella, R., Tanet, G., Douglas, K., Piazzalunga, A., Bolzacchini, E., Sangiorgi, G., Perrone, M.-G., Ferrero, L., Fermo, P., and Larsen, B. R.: Sources for PM air pollution in the Po Plain, Italy: I. Critical comparison of methods for estimating biomass burning contributions to benzo(a)pyrene, Atmos. Environ., 45, 7266–7275, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.08.061, 2011.
Belis, C. A., Pernigotti, D., Karagulian, F., Pirovano, G., Larsen, B. R., Gerboles, M., and Hopke, P. K.: A new methodology to assess the performance and uncertainty of source apportionment models in intercomparison exercises, Atmos. Environ., 119, 35–44, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.002, 2015.
Borlaza, L. J. S., Weber, S., Uzu, G., Jacob, V., Cañete, T., Micallef, S., Trébuchon, C., Slama, R., Favez, O., and Jaffrezo, J.-L.: Disparities in particulate matter (PM10) origins and oxidative potential at a city scale (Grenoble, France) – Part 1: Source apportionment at three neighbouring sites, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 5415–5437, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5415-2021, 2021.
Bougiatioti, A., Stavroulas, I., Kostenidou, E., Zarmpas, P., Theodosi, C., Kouvarakis, G., Canonaco, F., Prévôt, A. S. H., Nenes, A., Pandis, S. N., and Mihalopoulos, N.: Processing of biomass-burning aerosol in the eastern Mediterranean during summertime, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 4793–4807, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4793-2014, 2014.
Bourtsoukidis, E., Pozzer, A., Williams, J., Makowski, D., Peñuelas, J., Matthaios, V. N., Lazoglou, G., Yañez-Serrano, A. M., Lelieveld, J., Ciais, P., Vrekoussis, M., Daskalakis, N., and Sciare, J.: High temperature sensitivity of monoterpene emissions from global vegetation, Communications Earth & Environment, 5, 23, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-01175-9, 2024.
Bozzetti, C., El Haddad, I., Salameh, D., Daellenbach, K. R., Fermo, P., Gonzalez, R., Minguillón, M. C., Iinuma, Y., Poulain, L., Elser, M., Müller, E., Slowik, J. G., Jaffrezo, J.-L., Baltensperger, U., Marchand, N., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Organic aerosol source apportionment by offline-AMS over a full year in Marseille, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 8247–8268, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-8247-2017, 2017.
Brezins, M.: MRS-LCP and FOS 2023 Rolling PMF Xact Results _ Brezins et al., 2026, Version v1, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18374331, 2026a.
Brezins, M.: PD-SID and CD calculation for PMF factor profiles from Brezins et al. (2026, in prep.), Version v1, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18374603, 2026b.
Brezins, M., Chazeau, B., Marchand, N., Gille, G., Soubise, J., Favez, O., Jaffrezo, J. L., Uzu, G., and D'Anna, B.: Evolution of the V/Ni Ratio in Response to IMO Regulation-Induced Fuel Shifts and Scrubber Use, Environ. Sci. Tech. Let., 13, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.5c01199, 2026.
Bukowiecki, N., Lienemann, P., Hill, M., Furger, M., Richard, A., Amato, F., Prévôt, A. S. H., Baltensperger, U., Buchmann, B., and Gehrig, R.: PM10 emission factors for non-exhaust particles generated by road traffic in an urban street canyon and along a freeway in Switzerland, Atmos. Environ., 44, 2330–2340, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.03.039, 2010.
Cadeo, L., Biffi, B., Chazeau, B., Colombi, C., Cosenza, R., Cuccia, E., Manousakas, M.-I., Daellenbach, K. R., Prévôt, A. S. H., and Vecchi, R.: Intercomparison of online and offline XRF spectrometers for determining the PM10 elemental composition of ambient aerosol, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 6435–6448, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-6435-2025, 2025.
Camman, J., Chazeau, B., Marchand, N., Durand, A., Gille, G., Lanzi, L., Jaffrezo, J.-L., Wortham, H., and Uzu, G.: Oxidative potential apportionment of atmospheric PM1: a new approach combining high-sensitive online analysers for chemical composition and offline OP measurement technique, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 3257–3278, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-3257-2024, 2024.
Canonaco, F., Crippa, M., Slowik, J. G., Baltensperger, U., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: SoFi, an IGOR-based interface for the efficient use of the generalized multilinear engine (ME-2) for the source apportionment: ME-2 application to aerosol mass spectrometer data, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 3649–3661, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3649-2013, 2013.
Canonaco, F., Tobler, A., Chen, G., Sosedova, Y., Slowik, J. G., Bozzetti, C., Daellenbach, K. R., El Haddad, I., Crippa, M., Huang, R.-J., Furger, M., Baltensperger, U., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: A new method for long-term source apportionment with time-dependent factor profiles and uncertainty assessment using SoFi Pro: application to 1 year of organic aerosol data, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 923–943, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-923-2021, 2021.
Charron, A., Polo-Rehn, L., Besombes, J.-L., Golly, B., Buisson, C., Chanut, H., Marchand, N., Guillaud, G., and Jaffrezo, J.-L.: Identification and quantification of particulate tracers of exhaust and non-exhaust vehicle emissions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 5187–5207, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-5187-2019, 2019.
Chazeau, B., Temime-Roussel, B., Gille, G., Mesbah, B., D'Anna, B., Wortham, H., and Marchand, N.: Measurement report: Fourteen months of real-time characterisation of the submicronic aerosol and its atmospheric dynamics at the Marseille–Longchamp supersite, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 7293–7319, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7293-2021, 2021.
Chazeau, B., El Haddad, I., Canonaco, F., Temime-Roussel, B., D'Anna, B., Gille, G., Mesbah, B., Prévôt, A. S. H., Wortham, H., and Marchand, N.: Organic aerosol source apportionment by using rolling positive matrix factorization: Application to a Mediterranean coastal city, Atmospheric Environment: X, 14, 100176, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2022.100176, 2022.
Chebaicheb, H., F. De Brito, J., Chen, G., Tison, E., Marchand, C., Prévôt, A. S. H., Favez, O., and Riffault, V.: Investigation of four-year chemical composition and organic aerosol sources of submicron particles at the ATOLL site in northern France, Environ. Pollut., 330, 121805, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121805, 2023.
Chen, G., Sosedova, Y., Canonaco, F., Fröhlich, R., Tobler, A., Vlachou, A., Daellenbach, K. R., Bozzetti, C., Hueglin, C., Graf, P., Baltensperger, U., Slowik, J. G., El Haddad, I., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Time-dependent source apportionment of submicron organic aerosol for a rural site in an alpine valley using a rolling positive matrix factorisation (PMF) window, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 15081–15101, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15081-2021, 2021.
Chen, G., Canonaco, F., Tobler, A., Aas, W., Alastuey, A., Allan, J., Atabakhsh, S., Aurela, M., Baltensperger, U., Bougiatioti, A., De Brito, J. F., Ceburnis, D., Chazeau, B., Chebaicheb, H., Daellenbach, K. R., Ehn, M., El Haddad, I., Eleftheriadis, K., Favez, O., Flentje, H., Font, A., Fossum, K., Freney, E., Gini, M., Green, D. C., Heikkinen, L., Herrmann, H., Kalogridis, A.-C., Keernik, H., Lhotka, R., Lin, C., Lunder, C., Maasikmets, M., Manousakas, M. I., Marchand, N., Marin, C., Marmureanu, L., Mihalopoulos, N., Močnik, G., Nęcki, J., O'Dowd, C., Ovadnevaite, J., Peter, T., Petit, J.-E., Pikridas, M., Matthew Platt, S., Pokorná, P., Poulain, L., Priestman, M., Riffault, V., Rinaldi, M., Różański, K., Schwarz, J., Sciare, J., Simon, L., Skiba, A., Slowik, J. G., Sosedova, Y., Stavroulas, I., Styszko, K., Teinemaa, E., Timonen, H., Tremper, A., Vasilescu, J., Via, M., Vodička, P., Wiedensohler, A., Zografou, O., Cruz Minguillón, M., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: European aerosol phenomenology – 8: Harmonised source apportionment of organic aerosol using 22 Year-long ACSM/AMS datasets, Environ. Int., 166, 107325, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2022.107325, 2022a.
Chen, G., Canonaco, F., Slowik, J. G., Daellenbach, K. R., Tobler, A., Petit, J.-E., Favez, O., Stavroulas, I., Mihalopoulos, N., Gerasopoulos, E., El Haddad, I., Baltensperger, U., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Real-Time Source Apportionment of Organic Aerosols in Three European Cities, Environ. Sci. Technol., 56, 15290–15297, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c02509, 2022b.
Chevet, E., Boiron, O., and Anselmet, F.: Modeling of air pollution due to marine traffic in Marseille, Atmos. Environ., 329, 120542, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120542, 2024.
Clements, N., Eav, J., Xie, M., Hannigan, M. P., Miller, S. L., Navidi, W., Peel, J. L., Schauer, J. J., Shafer, M. M., and Milford, J. B.: Concentrations and source insights for trace elements in fine and coarse particulate matter, Atmos. Environ., 89, 373–381, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.01.011, 2014.
Currie, L. A.: Detection and quantification in X-ray fluorescence spectrometry, in: X-ray fluorescence analysis of environmental samples, edited by: Dzubay, T. G., Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, ISBN 0250401347, 1977.
Dall'Osto, M., Querol, X., Amato, F., Karanasiou, A., Lucarelli, F., Nava, S., Calzolai, G., and Chiari, M.: Hourly elemental concentrations in PM2.5 aerosols sampled simultaneously at urban background and road site during SAPUSS – diurnal variations and PMF receptor modelling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4375–4392, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4375-2013, 2013.
Dockery, D. W., Pope 3rd, C. A., Xu, X., Spengler, J. D., Ware, J. H., Fay, M. E., Ferris Jr., B. G., and Speizer, F. E.: An association between air pollution and mortality in six U.S. cities, New Engl. J. Med., 329, 1753–1759, https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199312093292401, 1993.
Ding, X., Li, Q., Wu, D., Huo, Y., Liang, Y., Wang, H., Zhang, J., Wang, S., Wang, T., Ye, X., and Chen, J.: Gaseous and Particulate Chlorine Emissions From Typical Iron and Steel Industry in China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2020JD032729, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD032729, 2020.
Drinovec, L., Močnik, G., Zotter, P., Prévôt, A. S. H., Ruckstuhl, C., Coz, E., Rupakheti, M., Sciare, J., Müller, T., Wiedensohler, A., and Hansen, A. D. A.: The ”dual-spot” Aethalometer: an improved measurement of aerosol black carbon with real-time loading compensation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 1965–1979, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1965-2015, 2015.
Drobinski, P., Saïd, F., Ancellet, G., Arteta, J., Augustin, P., Bastin, S., Brut, A., Caccia, J. L., Campistron, B., Cautenet, S., Colette, A., Coll, I., Corsmeier, U., Cros, B., Dabas, A., Delbarre, H., Dufour, A., Durand, P., Guénard, V., Hasel, M., Kalthoff, N., Kottmeier, C., Lasry, F., Lemonsu, A., Lohou, F., Masson, V., Menut, L., Moppert, C., Peuch, V. H., Puygrenier, V., Reitebuch, O., and Vautard, R.: Regional transport and dilution during high-pollution episodes in southern France: Summary of findings from the Field Experiment to Constraint Models of Atmospheric Pollution and Emissions Transport (ESCOMPTE), J. Geophys. Res., 112, 2006JD007494, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007494, 2007.
Dubois, N., Foret, G., Siour, G., Uzu, G., Couvidat, F., Vida, M., André, J.-M., Moukhtar, S., Sirina-Leboine, N., Aujay-Plouzeau, R., Alleman, L., Conil, S., Pallares, C., Salque-Moreton, G., Stratigou, E., Alastuey, A., Querol, X., Ito, A., Jaffrezo, J.-L., Favez, O., and Beekmann, M.: Construction of copper, iron and manganese anthropogenic emission inventories for Europe, Atmos. Environ., 363, 121582, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2025.121582, 2025.
Dufresne, M., Salameh, T., Leonardis, T., Gille, G., Armengaud, A., and Sauvage, S.: Volatile organic compound sources and impacts in an urban Mediterranean area (Marseille, France), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 5977–5999, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5977-2025, 2025.
Efron, B.: Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife, Ann. Stat., 7, 1–26, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2958830(last access: 6 June 2025), 1979.
El Haddad, I., Marchand, N., Temime-Roussel, B., Wortham, H., Piot, C., Besombes, J.-L., Baduel, C., Voisin, D., Armengaud, A., and Jaffrezo, J.-L.: Insights into the secondary fraction of the organic aerosol in a Mediterranean urban area: Marseille, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 2059–2079, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-2059-2011, 2011.
El Haddad, I., D'Anna, B., Temime-Roussel, B., Nicolas, M., Boreave, A., Favez, O., Voisin, D., Sciare, J., George, C., Jaffrezo, J.-L., Wortham, H., and Marchand, N.: Towards a better understanding of the origins, chemical composition and aging of oxygenated organic aerosols: case study of a Mediterranean industrialized environment, Marseille, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 7875–7894, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7875-2013, 2013.
Eldred, R. A.: Comparison of Selenium and Sulfur at Remote Sites, J. Air Waste Manage., 47, 204–211, https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.1997.10464423, 1997.
Enestam, S., Boman, C., Niemi, J., Boström, D., Backman, R., Mäkelä, K., and Hupa, M.: Occurrence of Zinc and Lead in Aerosols and Deposits in the Fluidized-Bed Combustion of Recovered Waste Wood. Part 1: Samples from Boilers, Energy Fuels, 25, 1396–1404, https://doi.org/10.1021/ef101478n, 2011.
European Commission: The Krakow receptor modelling inter-comparison exercise, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability Publications Office, https://doi.org/10.2788/33914, 2008.
Faxon, C., Bean, J., and Ruiz, L.: Inland Concentrations of Cl2 and ClNO2 in Southeast Texas Suggest Chlorine Chemistry Significantly Contributes to Atmospheric Reactivity, Atmosphere, 6, 1487–1506, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos6101487, 2015.
Flaounas, E., Coll, I., Armengaud, A., and Schmechtig, C.: The representation of dust transport and missing urban sources as major issues for the simulation of PM episodes in a Mediterranean area, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 8091–8101, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8091-2009, 2009.
Formenti, P., Nava, S., Prati, P., Chevaillier, S., Klaver, A., Lafon, S., Mazzei, F., Calzolai, G., and Chiari, M.: Self-attenuation artifacts and correction factors of light element measurements by X-ray analysis: Implication for mineral dust composition studies, J. Geophys. Res., 115, 2009JD012701, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012701, 2010.
Fossum, K. N., Lin, C., O'Sullivan, N., Lei, L., Hellebust, S., Ceburnis, D., Afzal, A., Tremper, A., Green, D., Jain, S., Byčenkienė, S., O'Dowd, C., Wenger, J., and Ovadnevaite, J.: Two distinct ship emission profiles for organic-sulfate source apportionment of PM in sulfur emission control areas, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 10815–10831, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10815-2024, 2024.
Fröhlich, R., Cubison, M. J., Slowik, J. G., Bukowiecki, N., Prévôt, A. S. H., Baltensperger, U., Schneider, J., Kimmel, J. R., Gonin, M., Rohner, U., Worsnop, D. R., and Jayne, J. T.: The ToF-ACSM: a portable aerosol chemical speciation monitor with TOFMS detection, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 3225–3241, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3225-2013, 2013.
Fuller, R., Landrigan, P. J., Balakrishnan, K., Bathan, G., Bose-O'Reilly, S., Brauer, M., Caravanos, J., Chiles, T., Cohen, A., Corra, L., Cropper, M., Ferraro, G., Hanna, J., Hanrahan, D., Hu, H., Hunter, D., Janata, G., Kupka, R., Lanphear, B., Lichtveld, M., Martin, K., Mustapha, A., Sanchez-Triana, E., Sandilya, K., Schaefli, L., Shaw, J., Seddon, J., Suk, W., Téllez-Rojo, M. M., and Yan, C.: Pollution and health: a progress update, The Lancet Planetary Health, 6, e535–e547, https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00090-0, 2022.
Furger, M., Minguillón, M. C., Yadav, V., Slowik, J. G., Hüglin, C., Fröhlich, R., Petterson, K., Baltensperger, U., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Elemental composition of ambient aerosols measured with high temporal resolution using an online XRF spectrometer, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 2061–2076, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-2061-2017, 2017.
Gomes, L., Bergametti, G., Coudé-Gaussen, G., and Rognon, P.: Submicron desert dusts: A sandblasting process, J. Geophys. Res., 95, 13927–13935, https://doi.org/10.1029/JD095iD09p13927, 1990.
Gomez, J., Allen, R. J., Turnock, S. T., Horowitz, L. W., Tsigaridis, K., Bauer, S. E., Olivié, D., Thomson, E. S., and Ginoux, P.: The projected future degradation in air quality is caused by more abundant natural aerosols in a warmer world, Communications Earth & Environment, 4, 22, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00688-7, 2023.
Guo, Z., Wang, Q., Chen, N., Zhu, B., Zheng, H., Kong, S., Xie, M., and Yu, H.: Source Apportionment of Fine Particulate Matter in Wuhan: Application of Rolling Positive Matrix Factorization Under Different Seasons and Episodic Events, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 25, 7, https://doi.org/10.1007/s44408-025-00005-1, 2025.
Heikkinen, L., Äijälä, M., Daellenbach, K. R., Chen, G., Garmash, O., Aliaga, D., Graeffe, F., Räty, M., Luoma, K., Aalto, P., Kulmala, M., Petäjä, T., Worsnop, D., and Ehn, M.: Eight years of sub-micrometre organic aerosol composition data from the boreal forest characterized using a machine-learning approach, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 10081–10109, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10081-2021, 2021.
Janhäll, S., Andreae, M. O., and Pöschl, U.: Biomass burning aerosol emissions from vegetation fires: particle number and mass emission factors and size distributions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1427–1439, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1427-2010, 2010.
Jeanjean, M., Dron, J., Allen, B. L., Gramaglia, C., Austruy, A., Lees, J., Ferrier, Y., Periot, M., Dotson, M. P., Chamaret, P., and Cohen, A. K.: Participatory environmental health research: A tool to explore the socio-exposome in a major european industrial zone, Environ. Res., 218, 114865, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.114865, 2023.
Jézéquel, A., Faranda, D., Drobinski, P., and Lionello, P.: Extreme Event Attribution in the Mediterranean, Int. J. Climatol., 45, e8799, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.8799, 2025.
Jonsson, Å. M., Westerlund, J., and Hallquist, M.: Size-resolved particle emission factors for individual ships: PARTICLE EFs FROM INDIVIDUAL SHIPS, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L13809, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047672, 2011.
Jordan, C. E., Pszenny, A. A. P., Keene, W. C., Cooper, O. R., Deegan, B., Maben, J., Routhier, M., Sander, R., and Young, A. H.: Origins of aerosol chlorine during winter over north central Colorado, USA, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 678–694, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022294, 2015.
Keene, W. C., Khalil, M. A. K., Erickson, D. J., McCulloch, A., Graedel, T. E., Lobert, J. M., Aucott, M. L., Gong, S. L., Harper, D. B., Kleiman, G., Midgley, P., Moore, R. M., Seuzaret, C., Sturges, W. T., Benkovitz, C. M., Koropalov, V., Barrie, L. A., and Li, Y. F.: Composite global emissions of reactive chlorine from anthropogenic and natural sources: Reactive Chlorine Emissions Inventory, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 8429–8440, https://doi.org/10.1029/1998JD100084, 1999.
Kfoury, A., Ledoux, F., Roche, C., Delmaire, G., Roussel, G., and Courcot, D.: PM2.5 source apportionment in a French urban coastal site under steelworks emission influences using constrained non-negative matrix factorization receptor model, J. Environ. Sci., 40, 114–128, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2015.10.025, 2016.
Kothai, P., Saradhi, I. V., Pandit, G. G., Markwitz, A., and Puranik, V. D.: Chemical Characterization and Source Identification of Particulate Matter at an Urban Site of Navi Mumbai, India, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 11, 560–569, https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2011.02.0017, 2011.
Kreyling, W. G., Semmler-Behnke, M., and Möller, W.: Ultrafine Particle–Lung Interactions: Does Size Matter?, J. Aerosol Med. Pulm. D., 19, 74–83, https://doi.org/10.1089/jam.2006.19.74, 2006.
Kuittinen, N., Timonen, H., Karjalainen, P., Murtonen, T., Vesala, H., Bloss, M., Honkanen, M., Lehtoranta, K., Aakko-Saksa, P., and Rönkkö, T.: In-depth characterization of exhaust particles performed on-board a modern cruise ship applying a scrubber, Sci. Total Environ., 946, 174052, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174052, 2024.
Kumar, S., Aggarwal, S. G., Gupta, P. K., and Kawamura, K.: Investigation of the tracers for plastic-enriched waste burning aerosols, Atmos. Environ., 108, 49–58, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.02.066, 2015.
Kumar, V., Sahu, M., Biswal, B., Prakash, J., Choudhary, S., Raliya, R., Chadha, T. S., Fang, J., and Biswas, P.: Temporal dynamics and source characteristics of fine particulate matter using Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF), Atmos. Pollut. Res., 16, 102539, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2025.102539, 2025.
Lack, D. A., Moosmüller, H., McMeeking, G. R., Chakrabarty, R. K., and Baumgardner, D.: Characterizing elemental, equivalent black, and refractory black carbon aerosol particles: a review of techniques, their limitations and uncertainties, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 406, 99–122, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-013-7402-3, 2014.
Larssen, S., Sluyter, R., and Helmis, C.: Criteria for EUROAIRNET – The EEA Air Quality Monitoring and Information Network, EEA Technical Report No. 12, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/TEC12 (last access: 6 June 2025), 1999.
Le Berre, L., Temime-Roussel, B., Lanzafame, G. M., D'Anna, B., Marchand, N., Sauvage, S., Dufresne, M., Tinel, L., Leonardis, T., Ferreira de Brito, J., Armengaud, A., Gille, G., Lanzi, L., Bourjot, R., and Wortham, H.: Measurement report: In-depth characterization of ship emissions during operations in a Mediterranean port, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 6575–6605, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6575-2025, 2025.
Le Breton, M., Hallquist, Å. M., Pathak, R. K., Simpson, D., Wang, Y., Johansson, J., Zheng, J., Yang, Y., Shang, D., Wang, H., Liu, Q., Chan, C., Wang, T., Bannan, T. J., Priestley, M., Percival, C. J., Shallcross, D. E., Lu, K., Guo, S., Hu, M., and Hallquist, M.: Chlorine oxidation of VOCs at a semi-rural site in Beijing: significant chlorine liberation from ClNO2 and subsequent gas- and particle-phase Cl–VOC production, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 13013–13030, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-13013-2018, 2018.
Ledoux, F., Laversin, H., Courcot, D., Courcot, L., Zhilinskaya, E. A., Puskaric, E., and Aboukaïs, A.: Characterization of iron and manganese species in atmospheric aerosols from anthropogenic sources, Atmos. Res., 82, 622–632, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2006.02.018, 2006.
Lee, B. H., Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Schroder, J. C., Campuzano-Jost, P., Jimenez, J. L., McDuffie, E. E., Fibiger, D. L., Veres, P. R., Brown, S. S., Campos, T. L., Weinheimer, A. J., Flocke, F. F., Norris, G., O'Mara, K., Green, J. R., Fiddler, M. N., Bililign, S., Shah, V., Jaeglé, L., and Thornton, J. A.: Airborne Observations of Reactive Inorganic Chlorine and Bromine Species in the Exhaust of Coal-Fired Power Plants, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029284, 2018.
Lei, L., Xu, W., Lin, C., Chen, B., Fossum, K. N., Ceburnis, D., O'Dowd, C., and Ovadnevaite, J.: Enhancing Differentiation of Oxygenated Organic Aerosol: A Machine Learning Approach to Distinguish Local and Transboundary Pollution, ACS ES&T Air, 2, 891–902, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.4c00331, 2025.
Lin, C., Ceburnis, D., O'Dowd, C., and Ovadnevaite, J.: Seasonality of Aerosol Sources Calls for Distinct Air Quality Mitigation Strategies, Toxics, 10, 121, https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics10030121, 2022.
Liu, T., Chan, A. W. H., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Multiphase Oxidation of Sulfur Dioxide in Aerosol Particles: Implications for Sulfate Formation in Polluted Environments, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55, 4227–4242, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c06496, 2021.
Liu, X., Zhang, X., Jin, B., Wang, T., Qian, S., Zou, J., Dinh, V. N. T., Jaffrezo, J.-L., Uzu, G., Dominutti, P., Darfeuil, S., Favez, O., Conil, S., Marchand, N., Castillo, S., De La Rosa, J. D., Grange, S., Hueglin, C., Eleftheriadis, K., Diapouli, E., Manousakas, M.-I., Gini, M., Nava, S., Calzolai, G., Alves, C., Monge, M., Reche, C., Harrison, R. M., Hopke, P. K., Alastuey, A., and Querol, X.: Source apportionment of PM10 based on offline chemical speciation data at 24 European sites, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 8, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-025-01097-7, 2025.
Lu, G., Brook, J. R., Rami Alfarra, M., Anlauf, K., Richard Leaitch, W., Sharma, S., Wang, D., Worsnop, D. R., and Phinney, L.: Identification and characterization of inland ship plumes over Vancouver, BC, Atmos. Environ., 40, 2767–2782, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.12.054, 2006.
Manousakas, M., Furger, M., Daellenbach, K. R., Canonaco, F., Chen, G., Tobler, A., Rai, P., Qi, L., Tremper, A. H., Green, D., Hueglin, C., Slowik, J. G., El Haddad, I., and Prevot, A. S. H.: Source identification of the elemental fraction of particulate matter using size segregated, highly time-resolved data and an optimized source apportionment approach, Atmospheric Environment: X, 14, 100165, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2022.100165, 2022.
Manousakas, M. I., Zografou, O., Canonaco, F., Diapouli, E., Papagiannis, S., Gini, M., Vasilatou, V., Tobler, A., Vratolis, S., Slowik, J. G., Daellenbach, K. R., Prevot, A. S. H., and Eleftheriadis, K.: Implementation of real-time source apportionment approaches using the ACSM–Xact–Aethalometer (AXA) setup with SoFi RT: the Athens case study, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 3983–4002, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3983-2025, 2025.
Marris, H., Deboudt, K., Augustin, P., Flament, P., Blond, F., Fiani, E., Fourmentin, M., and Delbarre, H.: Fast changes in chemical composition and size distribution of fine particles during the near-field transport of industrial plumes, Sci. Total Environ., 427–428, 126–138, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.03.068, 2012.
Masoud, C. G., Modi, M., Bhattacharyya, N., Jahn, L. G., McPherson, K. N., Abue, P., Patel, K., Allen, D. T., and Hildebrandt Ruiz, L.: High Chlorine Concentrations in an Unconventional Oil and Gas Development Region and Impacts on Atmospheric Chemistry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 57, 15454–15464, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c04005, 2023.
Massimi, L., Simonetti, G., Buiarelli, F., Di Filippo, P., Pomata, D., Riccardi, C., Ristorini, M., Astolfi, M. L., and Canepari, S.: Spatial distribution of levoglucosan and alternative biomass burning tracers in atmospheric aerosols, in an urban and industrial hot-spot of Central Italy, Atmos. Res., 239, 104904, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.104904, 2020.
Moffet, R. C., Desyaterik, Y., Hopkins, R. J., Tivanski, A. V., Gilles, M. K., Wang, Y., Shutthanandan, V., Molina, L. T., Abraham, R. G., Johnson, K. S., Mugica, V., Molina, M. J., Laskin, A., and Prather, K. A.: Characterization of Aerosols Containing Zn, Pb, and Cl from an Industrial Region of Mexico City, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 7091–7097, https://doi.org/10.1021/es7030483, 2008.
Momenimovahed, A., Gagné, S., Gajdosechova, Z., Corbin, J. C., Smallwood, G. J., Mester, Z., Behrends, B., Wichmann, V., and Thomson, K. A.: Effective density and metals content of particle emissions generated by a diesel engine operating under different marine fuels, J. Aerosol Sci., 151, 105651, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2020.105651, 2021.
Morais, S., Fonseca, H. M. A. C., Oliveira, S. M. R., Oliveira, H., Gupta, V. K., Sharma, B., and De Lourdes Pereira, M.: Environmental and Health Hazards of Chromated Copper Arsenate-Treated Wood: A Review, Int. J. Env. Res. Pub. He., 18, 5518, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115518, 2021.
Moreno, T., Pandolfi, M., Querol, X., Lavín, J., Alastuey, A., Viana, M., and Gibbons, W.: Manganese in the urban atmosphere: identifying anomalous concentrations and sources, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 18, 173–183, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-010-0353-8, 2011.
Ngoc Thuy Dinh, V., Jaffrezo, J.-L., Dominutti, P. A., Elazzouzi, R., Darfeuil, S., Voiron, C., Marsal, A., Socquet, S., Mary, G., Cozic, J., Coulaud, C., Durif, M., Favez, O., and Uzu, G.: Decadal trends (2013–2023) in PM10 sources and oxidative potential at a European urban supersite (Grenoble, France), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 247–268, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-247-2026, 2026.
Paatero, P.: The Multilinear Engine: A Table-Driven, Least Squares Program for Solving Multilinear Problems, including the n-Way Parallel Factor Analysis Model, https://doi.org/10.1080/10618600.1999.10474853, 1999.
Paatero, P. and Hopke, P. K.: Rotational tools for factor analytic models, J. Chemometr., 23, 91–100, https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.1197, 2009.
Paatero, P. and Tapper, U.: Positive matrix factorization: A non-negative factor model with optimal utilization of error estimates of data values, Environmetrics, 5, 111–126, https://doi.org/10.1002/env.3170050203, 1994.
Pant, P., Shi, Z., Pope, F. D., and Harrison, R. M.: Characterization of Traffic-Related Particulate Matter Emissions in a Road Tunnel in Birmingham, UK: Trace Metals and Organic Molecular Markers, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 17, 117–130, https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2016.01.0040, 2017.
Parworth, C., Fast, J., Mei, F., Shippert, T., Sivaraman, C., Tilp, A., Watson, T., and Zhang, Q.: Long-term measurements of submicrometer aerosol chemistry at the Southern Great Plains (SGP) using an Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor (ACSM), Atmospheric Environment, 106, 43–55, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.01.060, 2015.
Pawar, P. V., Ghude, S. D., Govardhan, G., Acharja, P., Kulkarni, R., Kumar, R., Sinha, B., Sinha, V., Jena, C., Gunwani, P., Adhya, T. K., Nemitz, E., and Sutton, M. A.: Chloride (HClCl−) dominates inorganic aerosol formation from ammonia in the Indo-Gangetic Plain during winter: modeling and comparison with observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 41–59, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-41-2023, 2023.
Peng, X., Wang, W., Xia, M., Chen, H., Ravishankara, A. R., Li, Q., Saiz-Lopez, A., Liu, P., Zhang, F., Zhang, C., Xue, L., Wang, X., George, C., Wang, J., Mu, Y., Chen, J., and Wang, T.: An unexpected large continental source of reactive bromine and chlorine with significant impact on wintertime air quality, Natl. Sci. Rev., 8, nwaa304, https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwaa304, 2021.
Pernigotti, D. and Belis, C. A.: DeltaSA tool for source apportionment benchmarking, description and sensitivity analysis, Atmos. Environ., 180, 138–148, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.02.046, 2018.
Pey, J., Alastuey, A., and Querol, X.: PM10 and PM2.5 sources at an insular location in the western Mediterranean by using source apportionment techniques, Sci. Total Environ., 456–457, 267–277, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.03.084, 2013.
Polissar, A. V., Hopke, P. K., Paatero, P., Malm, W. C., and Sisler, J. F.: Atmospheric aerosol over Alaska: 2. Elemental composition and sources, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 19045–19057, https://doi.org/10.1029/98JD01212, 1998.
Pons, F., Alberti, T., Messori, G., Dulac, F., and Faranda, D.: Assessing Climate Change Impacts on the March 2024 Compound Floods and Saharan Dust Outbreak in Europe, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 130, e2024JD042218, https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD042218, 2025.
Puygrenier, V., Lohou, F., Campistron, B., Saïd, F., Pigeon, G., Bénech, B., and Serça, D.: Investigation on the fine structure of sea-breeze during ESCOMPTE experiment, Atmos. Res., 74, 329–353, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2004.06.011, 2005.
Quivet, E., Höhener, P., Temime-Roussel, B., Dron, J., Revenko, G., Verlande, M., Lebaron, K., Demelas, C., Vassalo, L., and Boudenne, J.-L.: Underestimation of Anthropogenic Bromoform Released into the Environment?, Environ. Sci. Technol., 56, 1522–1533, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c05073, 2022.
Rai, P., Furger, M., El Haddad, I., Kumar, V., Wang, L., Singh, A., Dixit, K., Bhattu, D., Petit, J.-E., Ganguly, D., Rastogi, N., Baltensperger, U., Tripathi, S. N., Slowik, J. G., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Real-time measurement and source apportionment of elements in Delhi's atmosphere, Sci. Total Environ., 742, 140332, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140332, 2020a.
Rai, P., Furger, M., Slowik, J. G., Canonaco, F., Fröhlich, R., Hüglin, C., Minguillón, M. C., Petterson, K., Baltensperger, U., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Source apportionment of highly time-resolved elements during a firework episode from a rural freeway site in Switzerland, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 1657–1674, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1657-2020, 2020b.
Rai, P., Furger, M., Slowik, J. G., Zhong, H., Tong, Y., Wang, L., Duan, J., Gu, Y., Qi, L., Huang, R.-J., Cao, J., Baltensperger, U., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Characteristics and sources of hourly elements in PM10 and PM2.5 during wintertime in Beijing, Environ. Pollut., 278, 116865, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116865, 2021.
Reff, A., Eberly, S. I., and Bhave, P. V.: Receptor Modeling of Ambient Particulate Matter Data Using Positive Matrix Factorization: Review of Existing Methods, J. Air Waste Manage., 57, 146–154, https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2007.10465319, 2007.
Riandet, A., Xueref-Remy, I., Popovici, I., Lelandais, L., Armengaud, A., and Goloub, P.: Diurnal and Seasonal Variability of the Atmospheric Boundary-Layer Height in Marseille (France) for Mistral and Sea/Land Breeze Conditions, Remote Sensing, 15, 1185, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15051185, 2023.
Riffault, V., Arndt, J., Marris, H., Mbengue, S., Setyan, A., Alleman, L. Y., Deboudt, K., Flament, P., Augustin, P., Delbarre, H., and Wenger, J.: Fine and Ultrafine Particles in the Vicinity of Industrial Activities: A Review, Crit. Rev. Env. Sci. Tec., 45, 2305–2356, https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2015.1025636, 2015.
Rose, J.: Trace elements in health: A review of current issues, Butterworths, London, UK, ISBN 0407002553, 1983.
Roy, P.-O., Bulle, C., and Deschênes, L.: Global-scale atmospheric modeling of aerosols to assess metal source-receptor relationships for life cycle assessment, Int. J. Life Cycle Ass., 24, 93–103, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1508-y, 2019.
Salameh, D., Detournay, A., Pey, J., Pérez, N., Liguori, F., Saraga, D., Bove, M. C., Brotto, P., Cassola, F., Massabò, D., Latella, A., Pillon, S., Formenton, G., Patti, S., Armengaud, A., Piga, D., Jaffrezo, J. L., Bartzis, J., Tolis, E., Prati, P., Querol, X., Wortham, H., and Marchand, N.: PM2.5 chemical composition in five European Mediterranean cities: A 1-year study, Atmos. Res., 155, 102–117, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2014.12.001, 2015.
Salameh, D., Pey, J., Bozzetti, C., El Haddad, I., Detournay, A., Sylvestre, A., Canonaco, F., Armengaud, A., Piga, D., Robin, D., Prevot, A. S. H., Jaffrezo, J.-L., Wortham, H., and Marchand, N.: Sources of PM2.5 at an urban-industrial Mediterranean city, Marseille (France): Application of the ME-2 solver to inorganic and organic markers, Atmos. Res., 214, 263–274, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.08.005, 2018.
Sandradewi, J., Prévôt, A. S. H., Szidat, S., Perron, N., Alfarra, M. R., Lanz, V. A., Weingartner, E., and Baltensperger, U.: Using Aerosol Light Absorption Measurements for the Quantitative Determination of Wood Burning and Traffic Emission Contributions to Particulate Matter, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 3316–3323, https://doi.org/10.1021/es702253m, 2008.
Schmale, J., Shindell, D., von Schneidemesser, E., Chabay, I., and Lawrence, M.: Air pollution: Clean up our skies, Nature, 515, 335–337, https://doi.org/10.1038/515335a, 2014.
Scerri, M. M., Kandler, K., Weinbruch, S., Yubero, E., Galindo, N., Prati, P., Caponi, L., and Massabò, D.: Estimation of the contributions of the sources driving PM2.5 levels in a Central Mediterranean coastal town, Chemosphere, 211, 465–481, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.07.104, 2018.
Simpson, W. R., Brown, S. S., Saiz-Lopez, A., Thornton, J. A., and Von Glasow, R.: Tropospheric Halogen Chemistry: Sources, Cycling, and Impacts, Chem. Rev., 115, 4035–4062, https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006638, 2015.
Solo-Gabriele, H.: Characteristics of chromated copper arsenate-treated wood ash, J. Hazard. Mater., 89, 213–232, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(01)00311-9, 2002.
Stein, S. E. and Scott, D. R.: Optimization and testing of mass spectral library search algorithms for compound identification, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom., 5, 859–866, https://doi.org/10.1016/1044-0305(94)87009-8, 1994.
Su, Y., Wu, D., Li, Q., Ding, X., Chen, Y., Zheng, H., Li, Y., Liu, Y., Liu, A., Wang, S., Cai, R., Wang, L., Jiang, J., Wang, T., Herrmann, H., George, C., Mellouki, A., and Chen, J.: Multiphase particle formation in industrial plumes corrects missing sulfate in the urban atmosphere, One Earth, 8, 101320, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2025.101320, 2025.
Sylvestre, A., Mizzi, A., Mathiot, S., Masson, F., Jaffrezo, J. L., Dron, J., Mesbah, B., Wortham, H., and Marchand, N.: Comprehensive chemical characterization of industrial PM2.5 from steel industry activities, Atmos. Environ., 152, 180–190, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.12.032, 2017.
Taiwo, A. M., Beddows, D. C. S., Calzolai, G., Harrison, R. M., Lucarelli, F., Nava, S., Shi, Z., Valli, G., and Vecchi, R.: Receptor modelling of airborne particulate matter in the vicinity of a major steelworks site, Sci. Total Environ., 490, 488–500, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.04.118, 2014.
Thornton, J. A., Kercher, J. P., Riedel, T. P., Wagner, N. L., Cozic, J., Holloway, J. S., Dubé, W. P., Wolfe, G. M., Quinn, P. K., Middlebrook, A. M., Alexander, B., and Brown, S. S.: A large atomic chlorine source inferred from mid-continental reactive nitrogen chemistry, Nature, 464, 271–274, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08905, 2010.
Tissari, J., Sippula, O., Torvela, T., Lamberg, H., Leskinen, J., Karhunen, T., Paukkunen, S., Hirvonen, M.-R., and Jokiniemi, J.: Zinc nanoparticle formation and physicochemical properties in wood combustion – Experiments with zinc-doped pellets in a small-scale boiler, Fuel, 143, 404–413, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.11.076, 2015.
Tobler, A. K., Skiba, A., Wang, D. S., Croteau, P., Styszko, K., Nęcki, J., Baltensperger, U., Slowik, J. G., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Improved chloride quantification in quadrupole aerosol chemical speciation monitors (Q-ACSMs), Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 5293–5301, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-5293-2020, 2020.
Tobler, A. K., Skiba, A., Canonaco, F., Močnik, G., Rai, P., Chen, G., Bartyzel, J., Zimnoch, M., Styszko, K., Nęcki, J., Furger, M., Różański, K., Baltensperger, U., Slowik, J. G., and Prevot, A. S. H.: Characterization of non-refractory (NR) PM1 and source apportionment of organic aerosol in Kraków, Poland, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 14893–14906, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-14893-2021, 2021.
Tremper, A. H., Font, A., Priestman, M., Hamad, S. H., Chung, T.-C., Pribadi, A., Brown, R. J. C., Goddard, S. L., Grassineau, N., Petterson, K., Kelly, F. J., and Green, D. C.: Field and laboratory evaluation of a high time resolution x-ray fluorescence instrument for determining the elemental composition of ambient aerosols, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 3541–3557, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-3541-2018, 2018.
Ulbrich, I. M., Canagaratna, M. R., Zhang, Q., Worsnop, D. R., and Jimenez, J. L.: Interpretation of organic components from Positive Matrix Factorization of aerosol mass spectrometric data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2891–2918, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2891-2009, 2009.
Valavanidis, A., Iliopoulos, N., Gotsis, G., and Fiotakis, K.: Persistent free radicals, heavy metals and PAHs generated in particulate soot emissions and residue ash from controlled combustion of common types of plastic, J. Hazard. Mater., 156, 277–284, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.12.019, 2008.
Via, M., Chen, G., Canonaco, F., Daellenbach, K. R., Chazeau, B., Chebaicheb, H., Jiang, J., Keernik, H., Lin, C., Marchand, N., Marin, C., O'Dowd, C., Ovadnevaite, J., Petit, J.-E., Pikridas, M., Riffault, V., Sciare, J., Slowik, J. G., Simon, L., Vasilescu, J., Zhang, Y., Favez, O., Prévôt, A. S. H., Alastuey, A., and Cruz Minguillón, M.: Rolling vs. seasonal PMF: real-world multi-site and synthetic dataset comparison, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 5479–5495, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5479-2022, 2022.
Viana, M., Reche, C., Amato, F., Alastuey, A., Querol, X., Moreno, T., Lucarelli, F., Nava, S., Calzolai, G., Chiari, M., and Rico, M.: Evidence of biomass burning aerosols in the Barcelona urban environment during winter time, Atmos. Environ., 72, 81–88, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.02.031, 2013.
Visser, S., Slowik, J. G., Furger, M., Zotter, P., Bukowiecki, N., Canonaco, F., Flechsig, U., Appel, K., Green, D. C., Tremper, A. H., Young, D. E., Williams, P. I., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Williams, L. R., Mohr, C., Xu, L., Ng, N. L., Nemitz, E., Barlow, J. F., Halios, C. H., Fleming, Z. L., Baltensperger, U., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Advanced source apportionment of size-resolved trace elements at multiple sites in London during winter, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 11291–11309, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11291-2015, 2015a.
Visser, S., Slowik, J. G., Furger, M., Zotter, P., Bukowiecki, N., Dressler, R., Flechsig, U., Appel, K., Green, D. C., Tremper, A. H., Young, D. E., Williams, P. I., Allan, J. D., Herndon, S. C., Williams, L. R., Mohr, C., Xu, L., Ng, N. L., Detournay, A., Barlow, J. F., Halios, C. H., Fleming, Z. L., Baltensperger, U., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Kerb and urban increment of highly time-resolved trace elements in PM10, PM2.5 and PM1.0 winter aerosol in London during ClearfLo 2012, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2367–2386, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2367-2015, 2015b.
Wang, H., Wang, X., Yang, X., Li, W., Xue, L., Wang, T., Chen, J., and Wang, W.: Mixed Chloride Aerosols and their Atmospheric Implications: A Review, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 17, 878–887, https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2016.09.0383, 2017.
Wang, H., Yuan, B., Zheng, E., Zhang, X., Wang, J., Lu, K., Ye, C., Yang, L., Huang, S., Hu, W., Yang, S., Peng, Y., Qi, J., Wang, S., He, X., Chen, Y., Li, T., Wang, W., Huangfu, Y., Li, X., Cai, M., Wang, X., and Shao, M.: Formation and impacts of nitryl chloride in Pearl River Delta, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 14837–14858, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14837-2022, 2022.
Wang, X., Bi, X., Li, H., Zhang, W., Dai, Q., Song, L., Li, L., Wu, J., Zhang, Y., and Feng, Y.: The role of sources and meteorology in driving PM2.5-bound chlorine, J. Hazard. Mater., 441, 129910, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129910, 2023.
Wasson, S. J., Linak, W. P., Gullett, B. K., King, C. J., Touati, A., Huggins, F. E., Chen, Y., Shah, N., and Huffman, G. P.: Emissions of Chromium, Copper, Arsenic, and PCDDs/Fs from Open Burning of CCA-Treated Wood, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 8865–8876, https://doi.org/10.1021/es050891g, 2005.
Weber, S., Salameh, D., Albinet, A., Alleman, L. Y., Waked, A., Besombes, J.-L., Jacob, V., Guillaud, G., Meshbah, B., Rocq, B., Hulin, A., Dominik-Sègue, M., Chrétien, E., Jaffrezo, J.-L., and Favez, O.: Comparison of PM10 Sources Profiles at 15 French Sites Using a Harmonized Constrained Positive Matrix Factorization Approach, Atmosphere, 10, 310, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10060310, 2019.
Wen, H. and Carignan, J.: Reviews on atmospheric selenium: Emissions, speciation and fate, Atmos. Environ., 41, 7151–7165, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.07.035, 2007.
WHO: WHO global air quality guidelines, https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/345329 (last access: 6 June 2025), 2021.
Yu, G., Zhang, Y., Yang, F., He, B., Zhang, C., Zou, Z., Yang, X., Li, N., and Chen, J.: Dynamic Ni/V Ratio in the Ship-Emitted Particles Driven by Multiphase Fuel Oil Regulations in Coastal China, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55, 15031–15039, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c02612, 2021.
Zhuang, H., Chan, C. K., Fang, M., and Wexler, A. S.: Formation of nitrate and non-sea-salt sulfate on coarse particles, Atmos. Environ., 33, 4223–4233, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00186-7, 1999.
Zittis, G., Almazroui, M., Alpert, P., Ciais, P., Cramer, W., Dahdal, Y., Fnais, M., Francis, D., Hadjinicolaou, P., Howari, F., Jrrar, A., Kaskaoutis, D. G., Kulmala, M., Lazoglou, G., Mihalopoulos, N., Lin, X., Rudich, Y., Sciare, J., Stenchikov, G., Xoplaki, E., and Lelieveld, J.: Climate Change and Weather Extremes in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East, Rev. Geophys., 60, e2021RG000762, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021RG000762, 2022.