Articles | Volume 3, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-3-101-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-3-101-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
27 Feb 2025
Research article |
| 27 Feb 2025
| 27 Feb 2025
Base synergy in freshly nucleated particles
Galib Hasan
Department of Chemistry, Aarhus University, Langelandsgade 140, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
Department of Chemistry, Aarhus University, Langelandsgade 140, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
Yosef Knattrup
Department of Chemistry, Aarhus University, Langelandsgade 140, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
Department of Chemistry, Aarhus University, Langelandsgade 140, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
Related authors
Galib Hasan, Yosef Knattrup, Haide Wu, and Jonas Elm
Aerosol Research, 4, 501–515, https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-4-501-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-4-501-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
New atmospheric particles affect air quality and climate, but the molecular processes behind their formation remain poorly understood. We used computer simulations to investigate how two common atmospheric acids interact with ammonia and amines during the earliest stages of particle formation. We found that sulfuric acid plays the dominant role in forming the smallest particles, while methanesulfonic acid contributes mainly during later growth, helping to clarify their roles in the atmosphere.
Galib Hasan, Yosef Knattrup, Haide Wu, and Jonas Elm
Aerosol Research, 4, 501–515, https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-4-501-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-4-501-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
New atmospheric particles affect air quality and climate, but the molecular processes behind their formation remain poorly understood. We used computer simulations to investigate how two common atmospheric acids interact with ammonia and amines during the earliest stages of particle formation. We found that sulfuric acid plays the dominant role in forming the smallest particles, while methanesulfonic acid contributes mainly during later growth, helping to clarify their roles in the atmosphere.
Astrid Nørskov Pedersen, Yosef Knattrup, and Jonas Elm
Aerosol Research, 4, 397–411, https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-4-397-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-4-397-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We investigated the new particle formation (NPF) potential of three atmospherically relevant oxygenated organic molecules (OOMs) using high-level computational methods. Cluster thermodynamics and formation rates were evaluated for systems containing sulfuric acid and various nitrogen bases. All three OOMs enhanced cluster formation, with dimethylamine-containing clusters showing the greatest effect. Pinyl diaterpenylic ester formed the most stable clusters due to its molecular flexibility.
Ivo Neefjes, Jakub Kubečka, and Jonas Elm
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 7631–7645, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-7631-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-7631-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Atmospheric particles impact climate and health. Most particles form through gas molecules colliding and sticking together. We use molecular dynamics accelerated by machine learning to study this process. We found that standard machine learning models often fail to capture the long-range forces driving collisions, and models with explicit long-range corrections are needed. This work provides a blueprint for accurate simulations of particle formation.
Ivo Neefjes, Yosef Knattrup, Haide Wu, Georg Baadsgaard Trolle, Jonas Elm, and Jakub Kubečka
Aerosol Research, 4, 1–22, https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-4-1-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-4-1-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We investigated how water vapor affects the earliest steps of atmospheric aerosol formation, a key process influencing clouds and climate. By benchmarking quantum-chemical methods, we identified reliable approaches for modeling hydrated molecular clusters of common atmospheric acids and bases. We show that humidity moderately stabilizes certain clusters but only modestly alters particle formation rates. These findings sharpen our understanding of clusters and their role in aerosol formation.
Yosef Knattrup, Ivo Neefjes, Jakub Kubečka, and Jonas Elm
Aerosol Research, 3, 237–251, https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-3-237-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-3-237-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Aerosols, a large uncertainty in climate modeling, can be formed when gas vapors and particles begin sticking together. Traditionally, these particles are assumed to behave like hard spheres that only stick together upon head-on collisions. In reality, particles can attract each other over distances, leading to more frequent sticking events. We found that traditional models significantly undercount these events, with real sticking rates being up to 2.4 times higher.
Yosef Knattrup and Jonas Elm
Aerosol Research, 3, 125–137, https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-3-125-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-3-125-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Using quantum chemical methods, we studied the uptake of first-generation oxidation products onto freshly nucleated particles (FNPs). We find that pinic acid can condense on these small FNPs at realistic atmospheric conditions, thereby contributing to early particle growth. The mechanism involves two pinic acid molecules interacting with each other, showing that direct organic–organic interactions during co-condensation onto the particle contribute to the growth.
Haide Wu, Yosef Knattrup, Andreas Buchgraitz Jensen, and Jonas Elm
Aerosol Research, 2, 303–314, https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-2-303-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-2-303-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The exact point at which a given assembly of molecules represents an atmospheric molecular cluster or a particle remains ambiguous. Using quantum chemical methods, here we explore a cluster-to-particle transition point. Based on our results, we deduce a property-based criterion for defining freshly nucleated particles (FNPs) that act as a boundary between discrete cluster configurations and bulk particles.
Astrid Nørskov Pedersen, Yosef Knattrup, and Jonas Elm
Aerosol Research, 2, 123–134, https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-2-123-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-2-123-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Aerosol formation is an important process for our global climate. While inorganic species have been shown to be important for aerosol formation, there remains a large gap in our knowledge about the exact involvement of organics. We present a new quantum chemical procedure for screening relevant organics that for the first time allows us to obtain direct molecular-level insight into the organics involved in aerosol formation.
Jonas Elm, Aladár Czitrovszky, Andreas Held, Annele Virtanen, Astrid Kiendler-Scharr, Benjamin J. Murray, Daniel McCluskey, Daniele Contini, David Broday, Eirini Goudeli, Hilkka Timonen, Joan Rosell-Llompart, Jose L. Castillo, Evangelia Diapouli, Mar Viana, Maria E. Messing, Markku Kulmala, Naděžda Zíková, and Sebastian H. Schmitt
Aerosol Research, 1, 13–16, https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-1-13-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-1-13-2023, 2023
Bernadette Rosati, Sini Isokääntä, Sigurd Christiansen, Mads Mørk Jensen, Shamjad P. Moosakutty, Robin Wollesen de Jonge, Andreas Massling, Marianne Glasius, Jonas Elm, Annele Virtanen, and Merete Bilde
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 13449–13466, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13449-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13449-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Sulfate aerosols have a strong influence on climate. Due to the reduction in sulfur-based fossil fuels, natural sulfur emissions play an increasingly important role. Studies investigating the climate relevance of natural sulfur aerosols are scarce. We study the water uptake of such particles in the laboratory, demonstrating a high potential to take up water and form cloud droplets. During atmospheric transit, chemical processing affects the particles’ composition and thus their water uptake.
Jingwen Xue, Fangfang Ma, Jonas Elm, Jingwen Chen, and Hong-Bin Xie
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 11543–11555, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11543-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11543-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
·OH/·Cl initiated indole reactions mainly form organonitrates, alkoxy radicals and hydroperoxide products, showing a varying mechanism from previously reported amines reactions. This study reveals carcinogenic nitrosamines cannot be formed in indole oxidation reactions despite radicals formed from -NH- H abstraction. The results are important to understand the atmospheric impact of indole oxidation and extend current understanding on the atmospheric chemistry of organic nitrogen compounds.
Rongjie Zhang, Jiewen Shen, Hong-Bin Xie, Jingwen Chen, and Jonas Elm
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 2639–2650, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2639-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2639-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Formic acid is screened out as the species that can effectively catalyze the new particle formation (NPF) of the methanesulfonic acid (MSA)–methylamine system, indicating organic acids might be required to facilitate MSA-driven NPF in the atmosphere. The results are significant to comprehensively understand the MSA-driven NPF and expand current knowledge of the contribution of OAs to NPF.
Cited articles
Alfaouri, D., Passananti, M., Zanca, T., Ahonen, L., Kangasluoma, J., Kubečka, J., Myllys, N., and Vehkamäki, H.: A study on the fragmentation of sulfuric acid and dimethylamine clusters inside an atmospheric pressure interface time-of-flight mass spectrometer, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 11–19, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-11-2022, 2022. a
Almeida, J., Schobesberger, S., Kürten, A., et al.: Molecular Understanding of Sulphuric Acid-Amine Particle Nucleation in the Atmosphere, Nature, 502, 359–363, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12663, 2013. a, b, c, d
Bannwarth, C., Caldeweyher, E., Ehlert, S., Hansen, A., Pracht, P., Seibert, J., Spicher, S., and Grimme, S.: Extended tight-binding quantum chemistry methods, WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci., 11, e1493, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.1493, 2021. a
Besel, V., Kubecka, J., Kurten, T., and Vehkamaki, H.: Impact of quantum chemistry parameter choices and cluster distribution model settings on modeled atmospheric particle formation rates, J. Phys. Chem. A, 124, 5931–5943, 2020. a
Bianchi, F., Tröstl, J., Junninen, H., Frege, C., Henne, S., Hoyle, C. R., Molteni, U., Herrmann, E., Adamov, A., Bukowiecki, N., Chen, X., Duplissy, J., Gysel, M., Hutterli, M., Kangasluoma, J., Kontkanen, J., Kürten, A., Manninen, H. E., Münch, S., Peräkylä, O., Petäjä, T., Rondo, L., Williamson, C., Weingartner, E., Curtius, J., Worsnop, D. R., Kulmala, M., Dommen, J., and Baltensperger, U.: New particle formation in the free troposphere: A question of chemistry and timing, Science, 352, 1109–1112, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad5456, 2016. a
Brandenburg, J. G., Bannwarth, C., Hansen, A., and Grimme, S.: B97-3c: A revised low-cost variant of the B97-D density functional method, J. Chem. Phys., 148, 064104, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5012601, 2018. a, b
Cooley, S., Schoeman, D., Bopp, L., et al.: Oceans and Coastal Ecosystems and Their Services [Internet], Climate Change 2022 – Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, Cambridge University Press; 379–550 pp., https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844.005, 2023. a
Cromar, K. and Lazrak, N.: Risk communication of ambient air pollution in the WHO European Region: review of air quality indexes and lessons learned, World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe, https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/365787, License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO, 2023. a
Ditchfield, R., Hehre, W. J., and Pople, J. A.: Self-Consistent Molecular-Orbital Methods. IX. An Extended Gaussian-Type Basis for Molecular-Orbital Studies of Organic Molecules, J. Chem. Phys., 54, 724–728, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1674902, 1971. a
Elm, J.: Elucidating the limiting steps in sulfuric acid–base new particle formation, J. Phys. Chem. A, 121, 8288–8295, 2017. a
Elm, J.: An Atmospheric Cluster Database Consisting of Sulfuric Acid, Bases, Organics, and Water, ACS Omega, 4, 10965–10974, 2019. a
Elm, J.: Toward a holistic understanding of the formation and growth of atmospheric molecular clusters: a quantum machine learning perspective, J. Phys. Chem. A, 125, 895–902, 2020. a
Elm, J., Passananti, M., Kurtén, T., and Vehkamaki, H.: Diamines can initiate new particle formation in the atmosphere, J. Phys. Chem. A, 121, 6155–6164, 2017. a
Grimme, S.: Exploration of chemical compound, conformer, and reaction space with meta-dynamics simulations based on tight-binding quantum chemical calculations, J. Chem. Theory Comput., 15, 2847–2862, 2019. a
Grimme, S., Bannwarth, C., and Shushkov, P.: A robust and accurate tight-binding quantum chemical method for structures, vibrational frequencies, and noncovalent interactions of large molecular systems parametrized for all spd-block elements (Z=1–86), J. Chem. Theory Comput., 13, 1989–2009, 2017. a, b
Halonen, R.: A consistent formation free energy definition for multicomponent clusters in quantum thermochemistry, J. Aerosol Sci., 162, 105974, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2022.105974, 2022. a
Halonen, R.: Assessment of Anharmonicities in Clusters: Developing and Validating a Minimum-Information Partition Function, J. Chem. Theory Comput., 20, 4099–4114, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00121, 2024. a
Henschel, H., Navarro, J. C. A., Yli-Juuti, T., Kupiainen-Määttä, O., Olenius, T., Ortega, I. K., Clegg, S. L., Kurtén, T., Riipinen, I., and Vehkamäki, H.: Hydration of atmospherically relevant molecular clusters: Computational chemistry and classical thermodynamics, J. Phys. Chem. A., 118, 2599–2611, 2014. a
Henschel, H., Kurtén, T., and Vehkamäki, H.: Computational study on the effect of hydration on new particle formation in the sulfuric acid/ammonia and sulfuric acid/ dimethylamine systems, J. Phys. Chem. A., 120, 1886–1896, 2016. a
Herb, J., Nadykto, A. B., and Yu, F.: Large Ternary Hydrogen-bonded Pre-nucleation Clusters in the Earth's Atmosphere, Chem. Phys. Lett., 518, 7–14, 2011. a
Huang, J. and MacKerell Jr., A. D.: CHARMM36 all-atom additive protein force field: Validation based on comparison to NMR data, J. Comput. Chem., 34, 2135–2145, 2013. a
Ianni, J. C. and Bandy, A. R.: A Density Functional Theory Study of the Hydrates of NH3⋅H2SO4 and its Implications for the Formation of New Atmospheric Particles, J. Phys. Chem. A., 103, 2801–2811, 1999. a
Jensen, A. B.: ClusterAnalysis, Gitlab [code], https://gitlab.com/AndreasBuchgraitz/clusteranalysis (last access: 12 February 2025), 2024. a
Jokinen, T., Sipilä, M., Junninen, H., Ehn, M., Lönn, G., Hakala, J., Petäjä, T., Mauldin III, R. L., Kulmala, M., and Worsnop, D. R.: Atmospheric sulphuric acid and neutral cluster measurements using CI-APi-TOF, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 4117–4125, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4117-2012, 2012. a
Jokinen, T., Lehtipalo, K., Thakur, R. C., Ylivinkka, I., Neitola, K., Sarnela, N., Laitinen, T., Kulmala, M., Petäjä, T., and Sipilä, M.: Measurement report: Long-term measurements of aerosol precursor concentrations in the Finnish subarctic boreal forest, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 2237–2254, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2237-2022, 2022. a
Kirkby, J., Curtius, J., Almeida, J., et al.: Role of Sulphuric Acid, Ammonia and Galactic Cosmic Rays in Atmospheric Aerosol Nucleation, Nature, 476, 429–433, 2011. a
Kirkby, J., Duplissy, J., Sengupta, K., et al.: Ion-induced nucleation of pure biogenic particles, Nature, 533, 521–526, 2016. a
Knattrup, Y., Kubečka, J., Wu, H., Jensen, F., and Elm, J.: Reparameterization of GFN1-xTB for Atmospheric Molecular Clusters: Applications to Multi-Acid–Multi-Base Systems, RSC Adv., 14, 20048–20055, https://doi.org/10.1039/D4RA03021D, 2024. a, b
Kubecka, J., Neefjes, I., Besel, V., Qiao, F., Xie, H.-B., and Elm, J.: Atmospheric sulfuric acid–multi-base new particle formation revealed through quantum chemistry enhanced by machine learning, J. Phys. Chem. A, 127, 2091–2103, 2023. a
Kupiainen, O., Ortega, I. K., Kurtén, T., and Vehkamäki, H.: Amine substitution into sulfuric acid – ammonia clusters, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 3591–3599, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-3591-2012, 2012. a
Kürten, A., Jokinen, T., Simon, M., et al.: Neutral molecular cluster formation of sulfuric acid–dimethylamine observed in real time under atmospheric conditions, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 15019–15024, 2014. a
Kürten, A., Li, C., Bianchi, F., Curtius, J., Dias, A., Donahue, N. M., Duplissy, J., Flagan, R. C., Hakala, J., Jokinen, T., Kirkby, J., Kulmala, M., Laaksonen, A., Lehtipalo, K., Makhmutov, V., Onnela, A., Rissanen, M. P., Simon, M., Sipilä, M., Stozhkov, Y., Tröstl, J., Ye, P., and McMurry, P. H.: New particle formation in the sulfuric acid–dimethylamine–water system: reevaluation of CLOUD chamber measurements and comparison to an aerosol nucleation and growth model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 845–863, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-845-2018, 2018. a
Kurtén, T., Torpo, L., Sundberg, M. R., Kerminen, V.-M., Vehkamäki, H., and Kulmala, M.: Estimating the NH3 : H2SO4 ratio of nucleating clusters in atmospheric conditions using quantum chemical methods, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 2765–2773, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-2765-2007, 2007. a
Kurtén, T., Loukonen, V., Vehkamäki, H., and Kulmala, M.: Amines are likely to enhance neutral and ion-induced sulfuric acid-water nucleation in the atmosphere more effectively than ammonia, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 4095–4103, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-4095-2008, 2008. a
Larson, L. J., Largent, A., and Tao, M.: Structure of the Sulfuric Acid – Ammonia System and the Effect of Water Molecules in the Gas Phase, J. Phys. Chem. A., 103, 6786–6792, 1999. a
Lawler, M. J., Winkler, P. M., Kim, J., Ahlm, L., Tröstl, J., Praplan, A. P., Schobesberger, S., Kürten, A., Kirkby, J., Bianchi, F., Duplissy, J., Hansel, A., Jokinen, T., Keskinen, H., Lehtipalo, K., Leiminger, M., Petäjä, T., Rissanen, M., Rondo, L., Simon, M., Sipilä, M., Williamson, C., Wimmer, D., Riipinen, I., Virtanen, A., and Smith, J. N.: Unexpectedly acidic nanoparticles formed in dimethylamine–ammonia–sulfuric-acid nucleation experiments at CLOUD, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 13601–13618, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13601-2016, 2016. a, b
Loeb, N. G. and Kato, S.: Top-of-atmosphere direct radiative effect of aerosols over the tropical oceans from the Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES) satellite instrument, J. Climate, 15, 1474–1484, 2002. a
Loukonen, V., Kurtén, T., Ortega, I. K., Vehkamäki, H., Pádua, A. A. H., Sellegri, K., and Kulmala, M.: Enhancing effect of dimethylamine in sulfuric acid nucleation in the presence of water – a computational study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4961–4974, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4961-2010, 2010. a, b
Ma, Y., Chen, J., Jiang, S., Liu, Y., Huang, T., Miao, S., Wang, C., and Huang, W.: Characterization of the nucleation precursor (H2SO4-(CH3)2NH) complex: Intra-cluster interactions and atmospheric relevance, RSC Adv., 6, 5824–5836, 2016. a
McMurry, P. H.: The history of condensation nucleus counters, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 33, 297–322, 2000. a
Myllys, N., Chee, S., Olenius, T., Lawler, M., and Smith, J.: Molecular-level understanding of synergistic effects in sulfuric acid–amine–ammonia mixed clusters, J. Phys. Chem. A, 123, 2420–2425, 2019. a
Nadykto, A. B. and Yu, F.: Strong Hydrogen Bonding between Atmospheric Nucleation Precursors and Common Organics, Chem. Phys. Lett., 435, 14–18, 2007. a
Nadykto, A. B., Herb, J., Yu, F., and Xu, Y.: Enhancement in the production of nucleating clusters due to dimethylamine and large uncertainties in the thermochemistry of amine-enhanced nucleation, Chem. Phys. Lett., 609, 42–49, 2014. a
Najibi, A. and Goerigk, L.: The Nonlocal Kernel in van der Waals Density Functionals as an Additive Correction: An Extensive Analysis with Special Emphasis on the B97M-V and ωB97M-V Approaches, J. Chem. Theory Comput., 14, 5725–5738, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00842, 2018. a
Neese, F.: Software update: The ORCA program system – Version 5.0, WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci., 12, e1606, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.1327, 2022. a
Olenius, T., Kupiainen-Määttä, O., Ortega, I., Kurtén, T., and Vehkamäki, H.: Free energy barrier in the growth of sulfuric acid–ammonia and sulfuric acid–dimethylamine clusters, J. Chem. Phys., 139, 084312, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4819024, 2013a. a
Olenius, T., Kupiainen-Määttä, O., Ortega, I. K., Kurtén, T., and Vehkamäki, H.: Free energy barrier in the growth of sulfuric acid-ammonia and sulfuric acid-dimethylamine clusters, J. Chem. Phys., 139, 084312, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4819024, 2013b. a
Ortega, I. K., Kupiainen, O., Kurtén, T., Olenius, T., Wilkman, O., McGrath, M. J., Loukonen, V., and Vehkamäki, H.: From quantum chemical formation free energies to evaporation rates, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 225–235, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-225-2012, 2012. a
Passananti, M., Zapadinsky, E., Zanca, T., Kangasluoma, J., Myllys, N., Rissanen, M. P., Kurtén, T., Ehn, M., Attoui, M., and Vehkamäki, H.: How well can we predict cluster fragmentation inside a mass spectrometer?, Chem. Commun., 55, 5946–5949, 2019. a
Pelucchi, C., Negri, E., Gallus, S., Boffetta, P., Tramacere, I., and La Vecchia, C.: Long-term Particulate Matter Exposure and Mortality: A Review of European Epidemiological Studies, BMC Public Health, 9, 453, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-453, 2009. a
Pracht, P. and Grimme, S.: Calculation of absolute molecular entropies and heat capacities made simple, Chem. Sci., 12, 6551–6568, 2021. a
Pracht, P., Bauer, C. A., and Grimme, S.: Automated and efficient quantum chemical determination and energetic ranking of molecular protonation sites, J. Comput. Chem., 38, 2618–2631, 2017. a
Pracht, P., Bohle, F., and Grimme, S.: Automated exploration of the low-energy chemical space with fast quantum chemical methods, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 22, 7169–7192, 2020. a
Rosenfeld, D., Andreae, M. O., Asmi, A., Chin, M., de Leeuw, G., Donovan, D. P., Kahn, R., Kinne, S., Kivekäs, N., Kulmala, M., Lau, W., Schmidt, K. S., Suni, T., Wagner, T., Wild, M., and Quaas, J.: Global observations of aerosol-cloud-precipitation-climate interactions, Rev. Geophys., 52, 750–808, 2014. a
Sindel, J. P., Gobrecht, D., Helling, C., and Decin, L.: Revisiting Fundamental Properties of TiO2 Nanoclusters as Condensation Seeds in Astrophysical Environments, Astron. Astrophys., 668, A35, https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202243306, 2022. a
Spicher, S., Plett, C., Pracht, P., Hansen, A., and Grimme, S.: Automated molecular cluster growing for explicit solvation by efficient force field and tight binding methods, J. Chem. Theory Comput., 18, 3174–3189, 2022. a
Spracklen, D. V., Carslaw, K. S., Kulmala, M., Kerminen, V.-M., Mann, G. W., and Sihto, S.-L.: The contribution of boundary layer nucleation events to total particle concentrations on regional and global scales, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 5631–5648, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-5631-2006, 2006. a
Temelso, B., Morrison, E. F., Speer, D. L., Cao, B. C., Appiah-Padi, N., Kim, G., and Shields, G. C.: Effect of mixing ammonia and alkylamines on sulfate aerosol formation, J. Phys. Chem. A, 122, 1612–1622, 2018. a
Vanhanen, J., Mikkilä, J., Lehtipalo, K., Sipilä, M., Manninen, H., Siivola, E., Petäjä, T., and Kulmala, M.: Particle size magnifier for nano-CN detection, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 45, 533–542, 2011. a
Weigend, F. and Ahlrichs, R.: Balanced Basis Sets of Split Valence, Triple Zeta Valence and Quadruple Zeta Valence Quality for H to Rn: Design and Assessment of Accuracy, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 7, 3297–3305, https://doi.org/10.1039/B508541A, 2005. a
Wilemski, G. and Wyslouzil, B. E.: Binary nucleation kinetics. I. Self-consistent size distribution, J. Chem. Phys., 103, 1127–1136, 1995. a
Yu, H., McGraw, R., and Lee, S.-H.: Effects of amines on formation of sub-3 nm particles and their subsequent growth, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L02807, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL050099, 2012. a
Zapadinsky, E., Passananti, M., Myllys, N., Kurtén, T., and Vehkamäki, H.: Modeling on fragmentation of clusters inside a mass spectrometer, J. Phys. Chem. A, 123, 611–624, 2018. a
Zhang, J. and Dolg, M.: ABCluster: the artificial bee colony algorithm for cluster global optimization, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 17, 24173–24181, https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP04060D, 2015. a
Zhang, J. and Dolg, M.: Global optimization of clusters of rigid molecules using the artificial bee colony algorithm, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 18, 3003–3010, https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP06313B, 2016. a
Zheng, J., Xu, X., and Truhlar, D. G.: Minimally augmented Karlsruhe basis sets, Theor. Chem. Acc., 128, 295–305, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-010-0846-z, 2011. a, b
Short summary
Aerosol formation is an important process for our global climate. However, there are high uncertainties associated with the formation of new aerosol particles. We present quantum chemical calculations of large atmospheric molecular clusters composed of sulfuric acid (SA), ammonia (AM), and dimethylamine (DMA). We find that mixed SA–AM–DMA systems cluster more efficiently for freshly nucleated particles compared to pure SA–AM and SA–DMA systems.
Aerosol formation is an important process for our global climate. However, there are high...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint