Articles | Volume 4, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-4-133-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-4-133-2026
Research article
 | 
18 Mar 2026
Research article |  | 18 Mar 2026

Results and insights from the first ACTRIS intercomparison workshop on sub-10 nm aerosol sizing instrumentation

Herbert G. Hartl, Janne Lampilahti, Rima Baalbaki, Lauri Ahonen, Tommy Chan, Tinghang Zhang, Joonas Vanhanen, Joonas Purén, Gerhard Steiner, Sebastian Schmitt, Torsten Tritscher, Amine Koched, Manuel Granzin, Petr Roztocil, Silja Häme, Tuukka Petäjä, and Katrianne Lehtipalo

Viewed

Total article views: 879 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
559 279 41 879 40 78
  • HTML: 559
  • PDF: 279
  • XML: 41
  • Total: 879
  • BibTeX: 40
  • EndNote: 78
Views and downloads (calculated since 29 Sep 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 29 Sep 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 879 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 879 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 25 Mar 2026
Download
Short summary
Small airborne particles influence how clouds form and how they affect the climate. Our study compared eight different instruments that measure the size distributions of these particles to understand the instruments' strengths and weaknesses. We found that some systems are more accurate, whereas others are more sensitive at tiny sizes. These results will help to improve future monitoring of air quality and climate processes.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint