Articles | Volume 4, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-4-133-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-4-133-2026
Research article
 | 
18 Mar 2026
Research article |  | 18 Mar 2026

Results and insights from the first ACTRIS intercomparison workshop on sub-10 nm aerosol sizing instrumentation

Herbert G. Hartl, Janne Lampilahti, Rima Baalbaki, Lauri Ahonen, Tommy Chan, Tinghang Zhang, Joonas Vanhanen, Joonas Purén, Gerhard Steiner, Sebastian Schmitt, Torsten Tritscher, Amine Koched, Manuel Granzin, Petr Roztocil, Silja Häme, Tuukka Petäjä, and Katrianne Lehtipalo

Related authors

Frequent new particle formation events in the Indo-Gangetic Plain occur under reduced condensation sink but are obscured by air mass heterogeneity
Gaurav K. Srivastav, Aasif A. Wagay, Janne Lampilahti, Jaswant Rathore, Ravi K. Kunchala, Dilip Ganguly, Markku Kulmala, Tuukka Petäjä, Pauli Paasonen, Roseline C. Thakur, and Shahzad Gani
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2212,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2212, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
On describing particle nucleation within the Volatility Basis Set
Neil M. Donahue, Lubna Dada, Dominik Stolzenburg, Eva Sommer, Mario Simon, Meredith Schervish, Jenna DeVivo, Alexandra Stinchfield, Natalie Burton, Nirvan Bhattacharyya, Brandon Lopez, Mingyi Wang, Wiebke Scholz, João Almeida, Bin Zhao, Martin Heinritzi, Hamish Gordon, Armin Hansel, Joachim Curtius, Katrianne Lehtipalo, Imad El Haddad, Jasper Kirkby, Richard Flagan, Markku Kulmala, and Douglas Worsnop
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 8311–8339, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-8311-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-8311-2026, 2026
Short summary
Improved isoprene emission estimates over the Finnish boreal forest using the MEGANv3.2 model
Manuel Bettineschi, Arineh Cholakian, Victoria Sinclair, Katerina Sindelarova, Arnaud P. Praplan, Steven J. Thomas, Tuukka Petäjä, Federico Bianchi, and Giancarlo Ciarelli
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 8067–8088, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-8067-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-8067-2026, 2026
Short summary
Near real-time & benchtop XRF intercomparison for PM elemental analysis on quartz and teflon filters: a case study across three European cities
Stefanos Papagiannis, Manousos I. Manousakas, Dimitrios F. Anagnostopoulos, Michael Pikridas, Rima Baalbaki, Jean Sciare, Niall O'Sullivan, Stig Hellebust, John Wenger, Kirsten N. Fossum, Jurgita Ovadnevaite, Anja Tremper, David Green, Konstantinos Eleftheriadis, and Evangelia Diapouli
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 19, 3491–3509, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-3491-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-3491-2026, 2026
Short summary
Calibrating interdependent photochemistry, nucleation, and aerosol microphysics in chamber experiments
Neil M. Donahue, Victoria Hofbauer, Henning Finkenzeller, Dominik Stolzenburg, Paulus S. Bauer, Randall Chiu, Lubna Dada, Jonathan Duplissy, Xu-Cheng He, Martin Heinritzi, Christopher R. Hoyle, Andreas Kürten, Aleksandr Kvashnin, Katrianne Lehtipalo, Naser Mahfouz, Vladimir Makhmutov, Roy L. Mauldin III, Ugo Molteni, Lauriane L. J. Quéléver, Matti Rissanen, Siegfried Schobesberger, Mario Simon, Andrea C. Wagner, Mingyi Wang, Chao Yan, Penglin Ye, Ilona Riipinen, Hamish Gordon, Joachim Curtius, Armin Hansel, Imad El Haddad, Markku Kulmala, Douglas R. Worsnop, Rainer Volkamer, Paul M. Winkler, Jasper Kirkby, and Richard Flagan
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 19, 3363–3396, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-3363-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-3363-2026, 2026
Short summary

Cited articles

Asmi, E., Sipilä, M., Manninen, H. E., Vanhanen, J., Lehtipalo, K., Gagné, S., Neitola, K., Mirme, A., Mirme, S., Tamm, E., Uin, J., Komsaare, K., Attoui, M., and Kulmala, M.: Results of the first air ion spectrometer calibration and intercomparison workshop, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 141–154, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-141-2009, 2009. a
Cai, R., Yang, D., Ahonen, L. R., Shi, L., Korhonen, F., Ma, Y., Hao, J., Petäjä, T., Zheng, J., Kangasluoma, J., and Jiang, J.: Data inversion methods to determine sub-3 nm aerosol size distributions using the particle size magnifier, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 4477–4491, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4477-2018, 2018. a
Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne, J. T., Jimenez, J. L., Allan, J. D., Alfarra, M. R., Zhang, Q., Onasch, T. B., Drewnick, F., Coe, H., Middlebrook, A., Delia, A., Williams, L. R., Trimborn, A. M., Northway, M. J., DeCarlo, P. F., Kolb, C. E., Davidovits, P., and Worsnop, D. R.: Chemical and Microphysical Characterization of Ambient Aerosols with the Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer, Mass Spectrom. Rev., 26, 185–222, https://doi.org/10.1002/mas.20115, 2007. a
Chen, D.-R., Pui, D. Y. H., Hummes, D., Fissan, H., Quant, F. R., and Sem, G. J.: Design and evaluation of a nanometer aerosol differential mobility analyzer (Nano-DMA), J. Aerosol Sci., 29, 497–509, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(97)10018-0, 1998. a
Collins, A. M., Dick, W. D., and Romay, F. J.: A New Coincidence Correction Method for Condensation Particle Counters, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 47, 177–182, https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2012.737049, 2012. a, b
Download
Short summary
Small airborne particles influence how clouds form and how they affect the climate. Our study compared eight different instruments that measure the size distributions of these particles to understand the instruments' strengths and weaknesses. We found that some systems are more accurate, whereas others are more sensitive at tiny sizes. These results will help to improve future monitoring of air quality and climate processes.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint