Articles | Volume 2, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-2-21-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-2-21-2024
Opinion
 | 
27 Feb 2024
Opinion |  | 27 Feb 2024

Opinion: Should high-resolution differential mobility analyzers be used in mainstream aerosol studies?

Juan Fernandez de la Mora

Related subject area

Aerosol Measurements & Instrumentation (AMI)
The Centrifugal Differential Mobility Analyser – concept and initial validation of a new device for measuring 2D property distributions
Torben N. Rüther, David B. Rasche, and Hans-Joachim Schmid
Aerosol Research, 3, 65–79, https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-3-65-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-3-65-2025, 2025
Short summary
Performance evaluation of four cascade impactors for airborne ultrafine-particle (UFP) collection: the influence of particle type, concentration, mass, and chemical nature
Elisabeth Eckenberger, Andreas Mittereder, Nadine Gawlitta, Jürgen Schnelle-Kreis, Martin Sklorz, Dieter Brüggemann, Ralf Zimmermann, and Anke C. Nölscher
Aerosol Research, 3, 45–64, https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-3-45-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-3-45-2025, 2025
Short summary
Validation of cantilever-enhanced photoacoustic particle-size-resolved light absorption measurement using nigrosin reference particles and Mie modelling
Joel Kuula, Juho Karhu, Tommi Mikkonen, Patrick Grahn, Aki Virkkula, Hilkka Timonen, Tuomas Hieta, and Markku Vainio
Aerosol Research, 3, 1–13, https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-3-1-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-3-1-2025, 2025
Short summary
Field-deployable cantilever-enhanced photoacoustic instrument for aerosol light absorption measurement at three wavelengths
Juho Karhu, Tommi Mikkonen, Joel Kuula, Aki Virkkula, Erkki Ikonen, Markku Vainio, Hilkka Timonen, and Tuomas Hieta
Aerosol Research Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-2024-25,https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-2024-25, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for AR
Short summary
Comparison of size distribution and electrical particle sensor measurement methods for particle lung deposited surface area (LDSAal) in ambient measurements with varying conditions
Teemu Lepistö, Henna Lintusaari, Laura Salo, Ville Silvonen, Luis M. F. Barreira, Jussi Hoivala, Lassi Markkula, Jarkko V. Niemi, Jakub Ondracek, Kimmo Teinilä, Hanna E. Manninen, Sanna Saarikoski, Hilkka Timonen, Miikka Dal Maso, and Topi Rönkkö
Aerosol Research, 2, 271–289, https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-2-271-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-2-271-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Asmi, E., Sipilä, M., Manninen, H. E., Vanhanen, J., Lehtipalo, K., Gagné, S., Neitola, K., Mirme, A., Mirme, S., Tamm, E., Uin, J., Komsaare, K., Attoui, M., and Kulmala, M.: Results of the first air ion spectrometer calibration and intercomparison workshop, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 141–154, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-141-2009, 2009. 
Bezantakos, S., Giamarelou, M., Huang, L., Olfert, J., and Biskos, G.: Modification of the TSI 3081 differential mobility analyzer to include three monodisperse outlets: Comparison between experimental and theoretical performance, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 50, 1342–1351, https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2016.1227060, 2016. 
Cai, R., Chen, D. R., Hao, J., and Jiang, J.: A miniature cylindrical differential mobility analyzer for sub-3 nm particle sizing, J. Aerosol Sci., 106, 111–119, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2017.01.004, 2017. 
Cai, R., Attoui, M., Jiang, J., Korhonen, F., Hao, J., Petäjä, T., and Kangasluoma, J.: Characterization of a high-resolution supercritical differential mobility analyzer at reduced flow rates, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 52, 1332–1343, https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2018.1520964, 2018. 
de Juan, L. and Fernandez de la Mora, J.: High resolution size analysis of nanoparticles and ions: running a Vienna DMA of near optimal length at Reynolds numbers up to 5000, J. Aerosol Sci., 29, 617–626, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(97)10028-3, 1998. 
Download
Short summary
Differential mobility analyzers (DMAs) are widely used to measure aerosol size distributions. Here we argue that DMAs operating steadily at unusually high flow rates are not as complex as they appear and could be used with considerable advantage in many measurements currently carried out in conventional DMAs. We hope that the considerations presented will encourage DMA manufacturers to develop high-flow DMAs far more versatile yet comparable in complexity to today’s mainstream instruments.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint