Articles | Volume 3, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-3-45-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-3-45-2025
Research article
 | 
27 Jan 2025
Research article |  | 27 Jan 2025

Performance evaluation of four cascade impactors for airborne ultrafine-particle (UFP) collection: the influence of particle type, concentration, mass, and chemical nature

Elisabeth Eckenberger, Andreas Mittereder, Nadine Gawlitta, Jürgen Schnelle-Kreis, Martin Sklorz, Dieter Brüggemann, Ralf Zimmermann, and Anke C. Nölscher

Related authors

Sodium Thiosulfate-Coated Ceramic Denuders for Ozone Removal in Ultrafine Particle Sampling
Elisabeth Eckenberger, Andreas Mittereder, Nadine Gawlitta, Martin Sklorz, Dieter Brüggemann, Ralf Zimmermann, and Anke Christine Nölscher
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6287,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6287, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).
Short summary

Cited articles

Abdillah, S. F. I. and Wang, Y. F.: Ambient ultrafine particle (PM0.1): Sources, characteristics, measurements and exposure implications on human health, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.115061, 1 February 2023. 
Baron, P. A. and Willeke, K.: Aerosol Measurement: Principles, Techniques, and Applications, 3rd edn., https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118001684, 2011. 
Bayerisches Landesamt für Statistik: Statistik kommunal – Kreisfreie Stadt Bayreuth – 09462, 1–30 pp., https://statistik.bayern.de/mam/produkte/statistik_kommunal/2022/09472.pdf (last access: 15 January 2025), 2022. 
Bein, K. J. and Wexler, A. S.: A high-efficiency, low-bias method for extracting particulate matter from filter and impactor substrates, Atmos. Environ., 90, 87–95, 2014. 
Berner, A., Luerzer, C. H., Pohl, F., Preining, O., and Wagner, P.: The size distribution of the urban aerosol in Vienna, Sci. Total Environ., 13, 245–261, 1979. 
Download
Short summary
We assessed the performance of four cascade impactors for collecting and analyzing organic markers in airborne ultrafine particles (UFPs) under lab and field conditions. The cutoff was influenced by the impactor design and aerosol mixture. Two key factors caused variations in mass concentrations: the evaporation of semi-volatile compounds and the "bounce-off" of larger particles and fragments. Our findings reveal the challenges of analyzing organic marker mass concentrations in airborne UFPs.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint